Case law

Lessee of Cox v. Cromwell

3 Binn. 114 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1810

In the case of Sims’s Lessee v. Irwin, the Supreme Court of the United States decided, that an estate of this kind, was in all respects the same as a complete legal estate. … But this was his own folly; because he had full notice of the plaintiff’s claim, as appears by the caveat and proceedings before the board.

Salvation Army Case

349 Pa. 105 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1943

In Western Pennsylvania Hospital et al. v. … SE-9232, of the State Labor Relations Board of New York, in which a university owned and operated an office building. See Penna. Co., etc., Tr., v. Philadelphia et al., 346 Pa. 406 , 31 A. 2d 109 .

Haney, C. v. WCAB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 2019

: Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (COMMONWEALTH OF … : Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (COMMONWEALTH OF

Wilson v. Altemus

2 Watts & Serg. 255 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1841

The defendant sets up as a bar the decision of the Board of Property in his favour, on the 7th of February 1817, on a caveat in Wakefield v. … It is possible, and not unlikely, that the plaintiff was not aware of the legal construction of the 11th section of the Act of 3d of April 1792, which has been held in Shoenberger v.

O'Donnell v. Allegheny Valley Railroad

59 Pa. 239 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1868

Cumberland Valley Railroad Co., 11 Harris 384; Caldwell v. Brown, 3 P. F. Smith 453. … J., in Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad Co., 4 Metc. 57 . In Caldwell v. Brown, supra, Justice Read quotes the rule as stated by Judge Gray in Gilman v.

Smock v. Com.

496 Pa. 204 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1981

Smock v. Commonwealth, Pa. Cmwlth., 425 A.2d 883 (1981). This appeal followed. The Commonwealth Court dismissed appellant's Complaint, holding that jurisdiction over the instant dispute was with the Board of Claims. … The Commonwealth Court, however, has held that the Board of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over all contractual claims, either expressed or implied. Children's Rehabilitation Center v.

Shapp v. Kilgohe

3 Serg. & Rawle 387 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1817

In Brown v. Shaffer., (Chambersburg, September, 1814,) it was decided, that in a proceeding under the arbitration acts, a declaration is not essential; and in Hertzog v.

Ogontz School Tax Exemption Case

361 Pa. 284 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1949

In Harrisburg v. … In Town of Montclair v. State Board of Equalization of Taxes, 86 N. J.

Commonwealth v. Brooks

468 Pa. 547 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1976

The facts which occurred subsequent to appellant’s illegal arrest here are strikingly similar to those which occurred subsequent to the illegal arrest discussed in Brown v. … In Brown v. Illinois, the prosecution argued that the giving of Miranda warnings was sufficient, in and of itself, to vitiate the taint of the illegal arrest.

COM., D. OF EN. RES. v. City of Lebanon

482 Pa. 66 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1978

Minnesota State Board of Health v. City of Brainerd, 308 Minn. 24 , 241 N.W.2d 624 , appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 803 , 97 S.Ct. 35 , 50 L.Ed.2d 63 (1976); Young v. … Young v. Board of Health of Somerville, 61 N.J. 76, 78 , 293 A.2d 164, 165 (1972).

Meell Appeal

405 Pa. 184 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 1961

Meell appeared before the county board of elections and challenged the validity of certain absentee ballots wherein a vote was cast for candidate Maxwell. The board overruled the challenges. … The question of the validity of ballots involved is not for us to say: DeVito v. Civil Service Commission, 404 Pa. 354 , 172 A. 2d 161 (1961); Dauphin Deposit Trust Company v.

ODC v. Charles C. Shainberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 2022

: No. 2915 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 COUNSEL, : Petitioner : No. 41 DB 2022 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

West, Admrx. v. Young

332 Pa. 248 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1938

McGill, 265 Pa. 122 , 108 A. 410 ; Zeigler v. Storey, 220 Pa. 471 , 69 A. 894 ; Brown’s Estate, 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 236 , 161 A. 471 ) which may not be set aside in a collateral proceeding in the common pleas. … In Chester County Trust Co. v. Pugh, 241 Pa. 124 , 88 A. 319 , Brown, J., said: “An administrator serves in a dual capacity.

Saunders v. Gould

134 Pa. 445 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1890

Brown, for $6,000, dated October 19,1868; same day recorded. No. 2. Judgment, Allen v. Charles W. Hepburn, for $500; entered October 26, 1868. No. 3. Judgment, J. Alexander Simpson v. Charles W. … Alexander Simpson v. Charles W. Hepburn, for $500; entered March 8,1870. No. 6. Judgment, William L. Brown v. Charles W.

Commonwealth v. Stewart

456 Pa. 447 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1974

But see Commonwealth v. Brown, 451 Pa. 395 , 301 A.2d 876 (1973) (plurality opinion). The past practice with regard to moving for the withdrawal of a juror has been delineated and clarified under Rule 1118. … In Brown a plurality of the Court reasoned that Rule 1118(b) did not apply to all motions for mistrial, but only those where an event prejudicial to the defendant occurred during the trial. U. S. Const. amend. V.

Simon Appeal

408 Pa. 464 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1962

The board, in due course, filed its report assessing 93 properties, identified as V-l, to V-93, for the cost of the improvement. … McCreary v.

Wilkinsburg-Penn Joint Water Authority v. Churchill Borough

417 Pa. 93 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1965

Jacobs v. Fetzer, 381 Pa. 262 , 112 A. 2d 356 (1955). … In Hatfield Township v.

Egan v. USI Mid-Atlantic, Inc.

633 Pa. 703 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2015

ODC, Pet v. Michael Eric Greenberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2021

PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2825 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 101 DB 2020 v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

ODC, Pet v. Christopher P. Flannery

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2022

: : No. 59 DB 2022 Petitioner : : Attorney Registration No. 75426 v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa. R.D.E. 208(g).