Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.40s
ODC, Pet v. Jeffrey Michael Childs
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 2023
. 3 COUNSEL, : : Petitioner : No. 160 DB 2022 : v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublished637 Pa. 337 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2016
State Employees’ Retirement Board, 594 Pa. 244 , 935 A.2d 530 (2007); Tribune-Review Publ. Co. v. Bodack, 599 Pa. 256 , 961 A.2d 110 (2008). … Twelve years later, in Whalen v.
Cited 81 timesPublished9 Pa. D. & C.3d 526 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1978
Disciplinary counsel has set forth three instances in its brief opposing exceptions where an attorney has been suspended for multiple acts of neglect: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … [C], 26 D.B. 74, *530 Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [D], 48 D.B. 73 and Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [E], 20 D.B. 75.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBogdan v. School District of Coal Township
369 Pa. 147 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1952
The school board, by four to three vote, dismissed the elected township treasurer as collector of school taxes, and appointed another individual as school tax collector in his stead. … office cannot be deprived thereof because of nonperformance or misperformance of a duty in some other office or during a prior term of the same office.’ ” If our interpretation of the Act of 1911, supra, set forth in Black v.
Cited 9 timesPublished397 Pa. 512 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1959
Eagan v. Nagle, 378 Pa. 206 , 106 A. 2d 222 ; Loechel v. Columbia Borough School District, 369 Pa. 132 , 85 A. 2d 81 ; Leach v. … Philadelphia, Harrisburg & Pittsburgh Railroad Company, 258 Pa. 518 , 102 A. 174 ; McClure v. Monongahela Southern Land Co., 263 Pa. 368 , 107 A. 386 ; Slegel v. Lauer, 148 Pa. 236 , 23 A. 996 ; cf. also London v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedIn Re: Adoption of the Regulations of the Pennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: : NO. 572 : ADOPTION OF THE REGULATIONS OF : JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET THE PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL : ETHICS ADVISORY BOARD … : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2022, it is ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10
Cited 0 timesPublishedSicilia, V. v. API Roofers Adv. Program (WCAB)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2024
COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT VINCENT SICILIA : No. 14 MAP 2023 Appeal from the Order of the V. … dated (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL June 25, 2021, and Remanding at BOARD) No.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2829 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : v. … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFirst National Bank v. Commonwealth
520 Pa. 244 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1989
In Hotel Casey Co. v. … See Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedVictory Gardens, Inc. v. Warrington Twp
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 2020
: No. 51 MAL 2020 : : v. … : No. 69 MAL 2020 : : v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBeth. Area S.D. v. Bd. of Rev.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2020
PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT : No. 66 MAL 2020 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court THE BOARD OF REVENUE
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 2022
: No. 2844 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 174 DB 2020 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrederici v. Pa. Mutual Fire Ins.
1 Monag. 493 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1889
See Brown v. Schock, 77 Pa. 471. If, in a trial before a jury, the application could not be received in evidence, as this court has decided in Imperial Fire Insurance Co. v. … Brown v. Schock, 11 Pa. 471, has no application.
Cited 1 timesPublishedText from a scanHarris, D., Pet v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2022
Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v
Cited 0 timesPublishedSgarlat Estate v. Commonwealth
398 Pa. 406 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1960
The Board’s appraisers valued the condemned acreage at $1660, which was offered and refused, and a Board of View later awarded $6500. … In Chatfield v. Board of Revision of Taxes, 346 Pa. 159 (1943), 29 A. 2d 685 , we refused to base damage value upon the future development of a large estate as a community of small homes, and in Cox v. H. & P.
Cited 39 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2022
: No. 2919 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 87 DB 2022 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPark Drive Manor, Inc. Tax Assessment Case
380 Pa. 134 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1955
Stearns, The appeal is from a decree of the Court of Common Pleas No. 2, of Philadelphia County, affirming the assessment of the Board of Revision of Taxes. … The market valuation of the property in this case was established prima facie when the assessment record of the Board of Revision of Taxes was introduced in evidence in the court below.
Cited 37 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2852 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner No. 189 DB 2020 V. … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(8).
Cited 0 timesPublished153 Pa. 84 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1893
These cases have been approved in Dundass v. Gallagher, 4 Pa. 205 ; Brown v. Clark, 14 Pa. 474 , and Kauffman v. … In Lewis v.
Cited 14 timesPublished375 Pa. 42 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1953
In the case of the death of a licensee, the board may transfer the license to the surviving spouse or personal representative or to a person designated by him.” In Pichler v. … The lower court relied on the case of Aschenbach v. Carey, 224 Pa. 303 , 73 A. 435 , but that case is clearly distinguishable. There a decedent held a liquor license.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna