Case law

McCarthy v. Dunlevy-Franklin Co.

277 Pa. 467 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1923

That McCarthy’s employment was neither “casual in character” nor “not in the regular course of the business” of defendant is apparent (Callihan v. … For if he occupied the position of a worker for hire, who remained detached in order to use his labor and abilities as he might see fit, merely engaging himself casually to others (Callihan v.

Rue v. K-Mart Corp.

552 Pa. 13 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1998

See also Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Ceja, 493 Pa. 588 , 427 A.2d 631 (1981) (plurality opinion). … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 510 Pa. 574 , 579, 511 A.2d 167 , 169 (1986); Swineford v. Snyder County, 15 F.3d 1258 , 1268-69 (3d Cir. 1994).

Regina v. Monroe County

319 Pa. 257 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1935

Co. v. Eby, 107 Pa. 166 ; Hamilton v. Pgh., etc., R. R. Co., 190 Pa. 51 ; Phila. Ball Club v. Phila., 192 Pa. 632 ; see Iron City Automobile Co. v. Pgh., 253 Pa. 478 . … Co. v. McCloskey, 110 Pa. 436, 442-3 ; Setzler v. R. R. Co., 112 Pa. 56, 65 ; Port v. R. R. Co., 168 Pa. 19, 27 .

Commonwealth v. DERRY TP., ETC.

466 Pa. 31 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1976

See Commonwealth v. Washington Township, Pa., 344 A.2d 456 (1975); Pennsylvania Crime Commission Petitions, 446 Pa. 152 , 285 A.2d 494 (1971). … The court ordered that any agreement reached provide that Youngstown, Unity, and Derry each be allowed to select one member of the board. See Commonwealth v. Derry Township, 10 Pa.Cmwlth. 619 , 314 A.2d 868 (1973).

Chairman of Boards, Pet v. ZHB of Wilkinsburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARDS, INC., : No. 39 WAL 2022 : Petitioner … : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v

Leechburg Area School District v. Dale

492 Pa. 515 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1981

In Community College of Beaver County v. … See: Steelworkers’ Trilogy, United States Steelworkers v. American Mfg. Co., 363 U.S. 564 , 80 S.Ct. 1343 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1960); United Steelworkers v.

Janney v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

387 Pa. 282 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1956

Plaintiff relies in great measure upon the decision of the Supreme Court of Illinois in Wolfson v. … The defendant Company is not subject to the Business Corporation Law (see *285 section 4), being under tbe supervision of tbe Public Utility Commission, In Humphrys v.

Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'n v. Commonwealth Ass'n of School Administrators

569 Pa. 436 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 2002

In Tranter v. … In Wilson v.

Boulfrois v. United Traction Co.

210 Pa. 263 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1904

Justice Dean, We desire it to be distinctly understood that in Powelson, v. United Traction Co., 204 Pa. 474 ; Hunterson v. Traction Co., 205 Pa. 568 and Bainbridge v. … To this rule, as in all rules, we further said there are some rare exceptions, as in Johnson v. West Chester, etc., Railroad Co., 70 Pa. 357 , and Penna. Railroad Co. v.

Dunbar Appeal

446 Pa. 184 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1971

As this Court noted with approval in Bosack v. … Commonwealth v. Delaware Div. Canal Co., 123 Pa. 594, 624-25 (1889), aff’d sub nom., Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 U.S. 232, 10 S. Ct. 533 (1890) (emphasis added); ac *195 cord Perry County v.

Lawrence v. King

299 Pa. 568 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1930

Luther, 216 Pa. 1 ; Spangler Brewing Co. v. McHenry, 242 Pa. 522 ; King v. York Trust Co., 278 Pa. 141 ; Eddy v. Ashley Boro., 281 Pa. 4 ), if any at all is to be awarded. … Fay, 283 Pa. 175 ; Crick v. Paull, 287 Pa. 431 ; Fidelity Phila. Trust Co. v. Coal Co., 294 Pa. 47 .

Mathies Coal Co. Appeal

435 Pa. 129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1969

In Union Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. … Rockwell v.

ODC v. Ashley Drue Martin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2024

: No. 3032 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 COUNSEL, : : No. 123 DB 2022 Petitioner : v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Kline v. Harrisburg

362 Pa. 438 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1949

"Section 4113 Board of Appeals. … Jur. (1948) page 940, Miller v. Board of Public Works , 234 P. 381 (Cal.) 38 A.L.R. 1479, 1483 .

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Allegheny Health Education v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP

605 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 2010

Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.1983), which substantially distinguished, qualified, and, at least arguably, limited Cenco. See id. at 1347-49; cf. … Co. v.

Kia v. Commonwealth

624 Pa. 52 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 2014

Benchoff v. Corbett

586 Pa. 266 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2006

Boyce v. KLOPOTOSKY

601 Pa. 476 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2009

Leary v. McIlvain

263 Pa. 499 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1919

At the hearing the parties offered no evidence, but agreed the board should adopt and consider, as proofs in the case, the testimony taken *501 before the referee as though heard by it (McCauley v. … The contention here, as in Murdock v.

In re Appeal of the Township of South Whitehall

496 Pa. 152 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1981

Like its companion Keebler Co. v. Philadelphia Board of Revision of Taxes, 496 Pa. 140 , 436 A.2d 583 (1981), this matter involves the assessment of real property. … Pittsburgh Miracle Mile Town & Country Shopping Center, Inc. v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 243, 247 , 209 A.2d 394, 396 (1965).