Case law

Potters National Bank v. Ohio Township

260 Pa. 104 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1918

The language used in Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. Corry, 197 Pa. 41 , is pertinent to the question here involved. … Parol evidence was consequently admissible to supply the deficiencies of the record of the meeting and explain or supplement them: Hamill v. Supreme Council of The Royal Arcanum, 152 Pa. 537 ; Rose v.

Sheets' Estate

52 Pa. 257 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1866

This was settled in this state in Myers’ Appeal, 13 Wright 111 , following Knight v. Ellis, 2 Brown’s Ch. C. 570, and In re Wynch’s Trusts, 5 De Gex McN. & G. 188. … Some of them were cited in Powell v. Board of Domestic Missions, 13 Wright 56 , 57, 58, where the subject was also considerably discussed. Reference may also be made to Curtis v.

Jordan v. Hurst

12 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1849

He approves of the opinion of Judge Buller, in Brown v. Davis, and says that it goes the whole length of that cause. … Judge Kennedy, who delivered the opinion of the Court, recognises the authority of Brown v. Davis, in 3 Term Rep., and emphatically recognises the authority of the Bank v.

McMullan v. WOHLGEMUTH

453 Pa. 147 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1973

Powers and Duties of County Boards of Assistance. … In Sheppard v.

Commonwealth v. Edrington

317 Pa. Super. 545 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1983

As we said, with good reason, in Commonwealth v. Brown, 242 Pa.Super. 240, 247 , 363 A.2d 1249, 1253 (1976), “A criminal defendant who elects to plead guilty has a duty to answer questions truthfully. … Moreover, if the Henderson majority’s analysis is correct, Strader overrules not only Brown , but also well-reasoned unanimous decisions of our Supreme Court, such as Commonwealth v. Orr, supra, and Commonwealth v.

Central Iron & Steel Co. v. Harrisburg

271 Pa. 340 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1921

L. 277, the control of such a municipal undertaking was placed in a separate department, managed by a board appointed by councils. … Pittsburgh, 266 Pa. 24 ; Rieker v. Lancaster, 7 Pa. Superior Ct. 149 ; Ladd v. City of Boston, 170 Mass. 332 .

Keyes v. New York, Ontario & Western Ry. Co.

265 Pa. 105 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1919

Justice Moschzisker in Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Company, 264 Pa. 529 . As there was no hearing de novo by the board, the case rests upon the facts found by the referee (McCauley v. … The judgment of the court below is reversed and the award of the referee, as affirmed by the compensation board, is reinstated.

Eastern Univ. Acad. C.S., Aplt. v. S.D. of Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2021

: Appeal from the Order of Appellant : Commonwealth Court entered on July : 10, 2020 (reargument denied v … basis after charter expiration, see 24 P.S. §17-1729- A(f) (providing that, except in instances involving threats to personal safety, the charter remains in effect until final disposition by the Charter School Appeal Board

Commonwealth v. McGee

560 Pa. 324 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 2000

See Meeks v. … Galan, 82 F.3d 639 (5 th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 867 , 117 S.Ct. 179 , 136 L.Ed.2d 119 (1996); United States v. Brown, 59 F.3d 102 (9th Cir.1995); United States v.

In re Anonymous

22 Pa. D. & C.4th 69 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1993

The United States of America, USA v. [respondent], third party defendant [ ] and [B] v. The United States of America, USA v. … of informal admonition, which is what the Hearing Board unanimously recommends.

Commonwealth v. Windell

365 Pa. Super. 392 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 1987

In Commonwealth v. … Brown, 506 Pa. 169 , 484 A.2d 738 (1984), the Supreme Court held that the element of “force however slight,” required by 18 Pa.C.S. § 3701(a)(l)(v), can be satisifed by evidence of any amount of force applied to a victim

Piper v. Mowris

466 Pa. 89 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1976

Brown. We agree with the court en banc’s conclusion that Harold O. … Brown conveyed the tract to Steve M. Dasovich on December 6, 1944. On March 30, 1972, Steve M. Dasovich conveyed the tract to Mowris.

Koskovich, F.Pet v. Bd. Super. Sterling Twp.et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 2023

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE : STERLING TOWNSHIP, THE STERLING : TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD

Ogontz School Tax Exemption Case

361 Pa. 284 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1949

In Harrisburg v. … In Town of Montclair v. State Board of Equalization of Taxes, 86 N. J.

Conley v. School Directors

32 Pa. 194 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

It was not called so by the board of- directors, nor entered upon their minutes as such. … Rep. 451 ; repeated more fully in 3 Burr. 1456; Key v. Goodwin, 4 Moore & Payne 341-51; see also Butler v. Palmer, 1 Hill 324 .

Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Springettsbury Township

626 Pa. 408 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 2014

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANlA M|DDLE D|STR|CT HARLEY-DAV|DSON |\/|OTOR 1 NO. 39 |\/|AL 2014 CO|\/|PANY 1 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the v. : Order of the Commonwealth Court SPR|NGETTSBURY TOWNSH|P, CENTRAL … Bradford Countv Board of Assessment Appeals, 903 A.2d 620 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006) and Air Products and Chemicals, lnc. v. Board of Assessment Appeals of Lehiqh Countv, 720 A.2d 790 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998)? 2.

Young Mens Christian Assoc. of Germantown v. Phila.

323 Pa. 401 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1936

A. of Phila. v. Monmouth Co. Board of Taxation (N. … Cunningham v. Board of Assessors, 52 La.

Commonwealth v. Williams

547 Pa. 577 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1997

Griffin v. … Hendrickson v. Pennsylvania State Board of Parole, 409 Pa. 204 , 185 A.2d 581 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 817 , 83 S.Ct. 1713 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1963).

Ryan Estate

375 Pa. 42 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1953

In the case of the death of a licensee, the board may transfer the license to the surviving spouse or personal representative or to a person designated by him.” In Pichler v. … The lower court relied on the case of Aschenbach v. Carey, 224 Pa. 303 , 73 A. 435 , but that case is clearly distinguishable. There a decedent held a liquor license.

James J. v. Pennsylvania State Police

534 Pa. 616 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1993

See also Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Silva, 219 Pa.Super. 31 , 275 A.2d 871 (1971); Smart, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 16 Pa.Commw. 37, 328 A.2d 923 (1974); Becker v. … Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 44 Pa.Commw. 616, 406 A.2d 1153 (1979); Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v.