Case law

Bradley Election Case

352 Pa. 63 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1945

From November 22 to November 27,1944, the county board computed the military ballots. … provisions, the latter operates to the extent of the repugnancy as a repeal of the former; and it is not necessary that the latter act contain a provision expressly repealing the prior act or parts thereof”: Commonwealth v.

Stiles v. Stiles

397 Pa. 352 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1959

In support of this contention defendants cite Boggs v. Werner, 372 Pa. 312 , 94 A. 2d 50 ; Snyder v. Oestreich, 9 Pa. D. & C. 2d 92 ; and Felix v. Wax, 13 Pa. D. & C. 2d 600 . … Boggs v. Werner, 372 Pa. 312 , 94 A. 2d 50 .

PA Dem Party. v. Boockvar Pet: Boockvar

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2020

United States v. … In Bell v.

Day v. Amwell Township School District

283 Pa. 248 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1925

The school board having the right under the School Code of 1911, P. … And in the very late case of Hibbs et al. v.

Gasperin v. Consolidated Coal Co.

293 Pa. 589 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1928

cases, our revisory powers are limited to such consideration of the record as will enable us to ascertain whether there is evidence to support the findings and, if so, whether the law has been properly applied”: Watkins v. … A compensation agreement was later executed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the injured man was paid compensation for total disability.

Reeves Family, Pet.v.Schuylkill Twp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 2023

Allowance of Appeal Petitioners : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : v … Allowance of Appeal Petitioners : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : v

Reeves Family, Pet.v.Schuylkill Twp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 2023

Allowance of Appeal Petitioners : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : v … Allowance of Appeal Petitioners : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : v

Halko v. Foster Township School District

374 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1953

Cartwright v. Cartwright, 350 Pa. 638, 644 , 40 A. 2d 30 . … Therefore when the plaintiff was absent for three consecutive years without statutory authority, his seniority rights began only when he was reemployed by the board, to wit, September 1,1945.

Horsham Township Election Case

356 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1947

Returns by the township district election board to the county board of elections certified that Beattie had received 321 votes and Kelly 304 votes. The county board issued a certificate of election to Beattie. … Elections and their regulations are exclusively for the legislature: Thompson v. Morrison, 352 Pa. 616 , 44 A. 2d 55 . The Act of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, 25 PS 2601, is the “Pennsylvania Election Code.”

Commonwealth v. Robinson

498 Pa. 379 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1982

At oral argument, this Court granted the parties leave to file supplemental briefs addressing Commonwealth v. Brown, 497 Pa. 7 , 438 A.2d 592 (1981), a recent decision of this Court interpreting Rule 1100. … Appellee concedes that, under Commonwealth v.

Renick v. Boyd

99 Pa. 555 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1882

Thus in Brown v. … J., said: “ The principle which is to govern this case was settled in Mather v. Trinity Church, 3 S. & R. 509; Baker v. Howell, 6 Id. 476; and Brown v.

Klein v. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS.

521 Pa. 330 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1989

Wright v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, 390 Pa. 75 , 134 A.2d 231 (1957). … Commonwealth State Employees' Retirement Board (SERB), 495 Pa. 324 , 433 A.2d 871 (1981); Catania v. SERB, 498 Pa. 684 , 450 A.2d 1342 (1982); Catania v.

Thompson v. Southern Connellsville Coke Co.

269 Pa. 500 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1921

In Loan Society v. … What was said by Chief Justice Mitchell in McCloskey v.

Commonwealth v. Jones

501 Pa. 162 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1983

Commonwealth v. Brown, 462 Pa. 578 , 342 A.2d 84 (1975); *166 Commonwealth v. Kenney, 449 Pa. 562 , 297 A.2d 794 (1972); Commonwealth v. Speller, 445 Pa. 32 , 282 A.2d 26 (1971); See also, Witherspoon v. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 467 Pa. 512 , 359 A.2d 393 (1976). Even if preserved for review, however, the Appellant’s claim is meritless.

Balch v. Budd Mfg. Co.

277 Pa. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1923

To the above-quoted matter from the satisfactory opinion of the court below, we need add only that the evidence in this case falls fairly within the requirements stated in Fink v. Sheldon A. & S. Co., 270 Pa. 476, 479 . … The judgment of the court below and the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board are affirmed.

Kerchner, Marshall & Co. v. Pittsburgh

406 Pa. 158 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1962

. *161 In Commonwealth v. … The clear import of the Paper Products Company case, as well as Brown & Zortman Machinery Co. v.

Brooks Building Tax Assessment Case

391 Pa. 94 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1958

Tax Assessment Case,. 380 Pa. 134 ; Flamingo Apartments, Inc., v.. Board of Revision of Taxes, 383 Pa. 223 . … Exactly the same contention was made and rejected in Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision of Tax Assessments in Greene County, 284 U.S. 23 . . . .

Schmucker v. Hanna

377 Pa. Super. 301 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1988

In DeWitt v. Kaiser, 335 Pa.Super. 258, 261-62 , 484 A.2d 121, 123 (1984), quoting Kleintop v. … Nitkiewicz v. Nitkiewicz, 369 Pa.Super. 504, 507 , 535 A.2d 664, 665 (1988) (citation omitted); Ruth v. Ruth, 316 Pa.Super. 282 , 462 A.2d 1351 (1983).

Piccirilli Bros. v. Lewis, Aud. Gen.

282 Pa. 328 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1925

The objection by the state treasurer that no relief should have been granted against him, because he had not failed in the performance of any duty, is exactly the point made by his predecessor in Com. v. … Att’y General v. *336 Lewis, Auditor General, [ 282 Pa. 306 ] the relevant provisions of that code, and they need not be repeated here.

Smyth v. Hawthorn

3 Rawle 355 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1832

Wood v. Brown, 1 Stark. 217. So a promise after dishonour of the bill to pay if the holder would call again. Lundie v. Robertson, 7 East, 231. … Browning v. Kinnear, 1 Neil Gow. N. P. R. 81. Judgment affirmed.