Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.84s
Nether Providence Township School Authority v. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc.
505 Pa. 42 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 1984
Morgan; Brobst v. Reading, 236 Pa. 629 , 85 A. 65 (1912); Silsby Manufacturing Company v. Allentown, 153 Pa. 319 , 26 A. 646 (1893); Malone v. Philadelphia, 147 Pa. 416 , 23 A. 628 (1892); City v. … Hays, 93 Pa. 72 (1881); McKnight v. Pittsburgh, 91 Pa. 273 (1879); Hague v. Philadelphia, 48 Pa. 527, 529 (1865); Lehigh County v. Kleckner, 5 Watts & Serg. 181, 186 (1843).
Cited 6 timesPublishedCommonwealth Ex Rel. Laughlin v. Green
351 Pa. 170 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1944
Grabert v. … In Adams v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedFranklin Cty. Prison Bd. v. Pa. Lab. R. Bd.
491 Pa. 50 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1980
491 Pa. 50 (1980) 417 A.2d 1138 FRANKLIN COUNTY PRISON BOARD v. … Ellenbogen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWright v. Lower Salford Township Municipal Police Pension Fund
639 Pa. 387 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedCairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.
366 Pa. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1951
Elizabeth Cairgle filed her claim to compensation with the Workmen's Compensation Board on the ground that she was a dependent widow. … This testimony was disbelieved by the referee and by the Workmen's Compensation Board. Uncontradicted testimony need not be accepted as true ( Aaron v.
Cited 63 timesPublished416 Pa. 560 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1965
In Yocum v. … (Emphasis supplied) It is thus clear from Yocum v. Power and Shapiro v. Zoning Board of Adjustment that substantial expenditures are not necessary to prevent a revocation of a building permit already granted.
Cited 12 timesPublishedRylke v. Portage Area School District
473 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1977
In Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School District, 461 Pa. 494 , 337 A.2d 262 (1975), this court was asked to interpret § 701 of PERA in light of limitations in §§ 702 and 703. … In Board of Ed. v. Philadelphia Fed. of Teach. Loc. No. 3, 464 Pa. 92 , 346 A.2d 35 (1975), the school board argued that suspension of a non-tenured teacher could not be submitted to arbitration.
Cited 25 timesPublished68 Pa. 151 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1871
Isaac Brown Parker died in Burlington, N. … Upon general principles no such decree could be made by the Orphans’ Court, nor is any such power given to it by the language of the Act of Assembly: Lewis v. County of Chester, 10 P. F. Smith 325.
Cited 3 timesPublished502 Pa. 619 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1983
Commonwealth v. Bastone, 466 Pa. 548 , 353 A.2d 827 (1976). The record discloses the following: On June 19, 1980, several trucks owned by the Opportunity Board of Montgomery County were broken into. … In Commonwealth v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedValley Forge Towers Apartments N, LP v. Upper Merion Area School District
163 A.3d 962 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 2017
of Assessment Appeals (the “Board”). … It reasoned that its pre-Springfield decision in Weissenberger v. Chester County Board of Assessment Appeals, 62 A.3d 501 (Pa.
Cited 37 timesPublishedLocust &8212 Broad (No. 1) &8212 Eighth Subway
319 Pa. 161 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1935
See also Merrick v. DuPoint, 285 Pa. 368 , 132 A. 181 ; March v. Traction Co., 285 Pa. 413 , 132 A. 355 ; Bridgeford v. Groh, 306 Pa. 566 , 160 A. 451 . … Ann. 1061 , 17 S. 498; Matthiessen, etc., Co. v. Jersey City, 26 N. J. Eq. 247; Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Chicago, 141 Ill. 586 , 30 N. E. 1044 . In Seattle, etc., Co. v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedPA Dem Party. v. Boockvar Pet: Boockvar
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2020
United States v. … In Bell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHalko v. Foster Township School District
374 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1953
Cartwright v. Cartwright, 350 Pa. 638, 644 , 40 A. 2d 30 . … Therefore when the plaintiff was absent for three consecutive years without statutory authority, his seniority rights began only when he was reemployed by the board, to wit, September 1,1945.
Cited 19 timesPublished498 Pa. 379 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1982
At oral argument, this Court granted the parties leave to file supplemental briefs addressing Commonwealth v. Brown, 497 Pa. 7 , 438 A.2d 592 (1981), a recent decision of this Court interpreting Rule 1100. … Appellee concedes that, under Commonwealth v.
Cited 21 timesPublished99 Pa. 555 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1882
Thus in Brown v. … J., said: “ The principle which is to govern this case was settled in Mather v. Trinity Church, 3 S. & R. 509; Baker v. Howell, 6 Id. 476; and Brown v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedKlein v. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS.
521 Pa. 330 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1989
Wright v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, 390 Pa. 75 , 134 A.2d 231 (1957). … Commonwealth State Employees' Retirement Board (SERB), 495 Pa. 324 , 433 A.2d 871 (1981); Catania v. SERB, 498 Pa. 684 , 450 A.2d 1342 (1982); Catania v.
Cited 22 timesPublished352 Pa. 63 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1945
From November 22 to November 27,1944, the county board computed the military ballots. … provisions, the latter operates to the extent of the repugnancy as a repeal of the former; and it is not necessary that the latter act contain a provision expressly repealing the prior act or parts thereof”: Commonwealth v.
Cited 8 timesPublished277 Pa. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1923
To the above-quoted matter from the satisfactory opinion of the court below, we need add only that the evidence in this case falls fairly within the requirements stated in Fink v. Sheldon A. & S. Co., 270 Pa. 476, 479 . … The judgment of the court below and the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board are affirmed.
Cited 10 timesPublishedKerchner, Marshall & Co. v. Pittsburgh
406 Pa. 158 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1962
. *161 In Commonwealth v. … The clear import of the Paper Products Company case, as well as Brown & Zortman Machinery Co. v.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna