Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.35s

  • COM., D. OF EN. RES. v. City of Lebanon

    482 Pa. 66 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1978

    Minnesota State Board of Health v. City of Brainerd, 308 Minn. 24 , 241 N.W.2d 624 , appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 803 , 97 S.Ct. 35 , 50 L.Ed.2d 63 (1976); Young v. … Young v. Board of Health of Somerville, 61 N.J. 76, 78 , 293 A.2d 164, 165 (1972).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pursel v. Ellis

    5 Watts & Serg. 525 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1843

    Thus, in Frantz v. Brown, (1 Penn. Rep. 257), it is held, that chancery will enjoin an obligee in a bond or his assignee from proceeding at law while the obligor remains a loser or in jeopardy as a surety. … The principle of Frantz v. Brown, fits the case in hand. Here, there is a contintingent liability for the amount of the note, which the defendant, for aught we know, may be compelled, to pay.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bank of America v. DeSue, J.(WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2022

    PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOANNE DESUE : No. 194 WAL 2022 : : v … Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court BANK OF AMERICA (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • PA Dem Party. v. Boockvar Pet: Boockvar

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 2020

    WILLIAMS : : : v. … See Hollingsworth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nearhoff v. Addleman

    31 Pa. 279 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

    On this point, we think, that neither Kite v. Brown, 5 Barr 291, nor Hole v. Rittenhouse, 1 Casey 491, rules the ease. … Brown, with associated warrants, with the external lines run but not dissevered by intermediate lines, and which also was the character of the body of lands alluded to by Chief Justice Lewis in the remark in Hole v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re: Condemn by City of Phila. Airport Bus. Ctr.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2026

    Id. 4 Parties generally were required to raise questions of law regarding the board’s report via exceptions. See Kellman Trust v. Com., Dep’t of Transp., 354 A.2d 583, 590 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1976) (en banc). … V, § 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chernoff's Case

    344 Pa. 527 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1942

    We thus announced our attitude in a comparatively recent case, Stone v. … A further quotation from Stone v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ingram v. Pittsburgh

    346 Pa. 45 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1942

    Superior Ct. 508 ; Commonwealth v. Bone, 64 Pa. Superior Ct. 44 . Moreover, the stenographer must testify as to the integrity of his or her notes and the transcript thereof: Commonwealth v. … That statute, as was said by this Court, in Freedman v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Lessee of Cox v. Cromwell

    3 Binn. 114 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1810

    In the case of Sims’s Lessee v. Irwin, the Supreme Court of the United States decided, that an estate of this kind, was in all respects the same as a complete legal estate. … But this was his own folly; because he had full notice of the plaintiff’s claim, as appears by the caveat and proceedings before the board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Philip Haibach Contracting Co. v. Hornung

    270 Pa. 350 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1921

    We have frequently held and recently repeated that unless we can say the action of the court in refusing judgment on rules of this character is clearly erroneous and free from doubt, its order will not be disturbed: Brown … et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Williams

    547 Pa. 577 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1997

    Griffin v. … Hendrickson v. Pennsylvania State Board of Parole, 409 Pa. 204 , 185 A.2d 581 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 817 , 83 S.Ct. 1713 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1963).

    Cited 85 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. Howard

    10 Serg. & Rawle 243 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1823

    A survey was made, a caveat entered by Andrews, and a decision of the board of property in favour of Howard, but no patent was issued. … This board possesses no judicial power: they are bare agents: their acts, where >they exceed their authority, void, liké the acts of all other agents. In Bixler v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Midland Insurance

    320 Pa. Super. 281 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1983

    Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 35 Pa.Cmwlth. 7, 11 , 384 A.2d 1017, 1019 (1978); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. DelCimmuto, 23 Pa.Cmwlth. 43, 45-46 , 350 A.2d 459, 460 (1976). See also: Plummer v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, supra, 62 Pa.Cmwlth. at 559 , 437 A.2d at 463 ; Davis v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Middletown Township v. Delaware County Institution District

    450 Pa. 282 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1973

    On September 22, 1971, after a hearing on these applications and a mutually agreed to delay, the Zoning Hearing Board informed the Institution District that the Board had no jurisdiction to issue either the special exception … Appellant also argues that this Court’s decision in School District of Philadelphia v. Zoning Board of Ad justment, 417 Pa. 277 , 207 A. 2d 864 (1965), controls here.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Yocham

    473 Pa. 445 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1977

    Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964) ; Wong Sun v. … As the United States Supreme Court in Brown v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Conley v. School Directors

    32 Pa. 194 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

    It was not called so by the board of- directors, nor entered upon their minutes as such. … Rep. 451 ; repeated more fully in 3 Burr. 1456; Key v. Goodwin, 4 Moore & Payne 341-51; see also Butler v. Palmer, 1 Hill 324 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Jackson, K., Aplt.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2023

    In Brown v. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 51-52.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Alpha Epsilon Pi

    373 Pa. Super. 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1988

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 346 Pa. 192 , 29 A.2d 793 (1943), relied upon by Appellant, involved two acts of assembly (the Penal Code and Election Code). Likewise, Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Bidner, 282 Pa.Super. 100 , 422 A.2d 847 (1980), like Brown I, supra, involved the Election Code and the Crimes Code. Finally, Commonwealth v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Livingston v. Vanguard Federal Savings Bank

    386 Pa. Super. 496 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 1989

    Toolan v. Trevose Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n, 501 Pa. 477 , 462 A.2d 224 (1983), citing Jones v. … Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., supra, quoting Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 435 U.S. 151, 157 , 98 S.Ct. 988, 994 , 55 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978), quoting Rice v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Chester Housing Authority

    389 Pa. 314 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1957

    : McCormick v. … In McCormick v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.