Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.35s
COM., D. OF EN. RES. v. City of Lebanon
482 Pa. 66 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1978
Minnesota State Board of Health v. City of Brainerd, 308 Minn. 24 , 241 N.W.2d 624 , appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 803 , 97 S.Ct. 35 , 50 L.Ed.2d 63 (1976); Young v. … Young v. Board of Health of Somerville, 61 N.J. 76, 78 , 293 A.2d 164, 165 (1972).
Cited 2 timesPublished5 Watts & Serg. 525 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1843
Thus, in Frantz v. Brown, (1 Penn. Rep. 257), it is held, that chancery will enjoin an obligee in a bond or his assignee from proceeding at law while the obligor remains a loser or in jeopardy as a surety. … The principle of Frantz v. Brown, fits the case in hand. Here, there is a contintingent liability for the amount of the note, which the defendant, for aught we know, may be compelled, to pay.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBank of America v. DeSue, J.(WCAB)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2022
PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOANNE DESUE : No. 194 WAL 2022 : : v … Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court BANK OF AMERICA (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD
Cited 0 timesPublishedPA Dem Party. v. Boockvar Pet: Boockvar
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 2020
WILLIAMS : : : v. … See Hollingsworth v.
Cited 0 timesPublished31 Pa. 279 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858
On this point, we think, that neither Kite v. Brown, 5 Barr 291, nor Hole v. Rittenhouse, 1 Casey 491, rules the ease. … Brown, with associated warrants, with the external lines run but not dissevered by intermediate lines, and which also was the character of the body of lands alluded to by Chief Justice Lewis in the remark in Hole v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn Re: Condemn by City of Phila. Airport Bus. Ctr.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2026
Id. 4 Parties generally were required to raise questions of law regarding the board’s report via exceptions. See Kellman Trust v. Com., Dep’t of Transp., 354 A.2d 583, 590 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1976) (en banc). … V, § 4.
Cited 0 timesPublished344 Pa. 527 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1942
We thus announced our attitude in a comparatively recent case, Stone v. … A further quotation from Stone v.
Cited 8 timesPublished346 Pa. 45 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1942
Superior Ct. 508 ; Commonwealth v. Bone, 64 Pa. Superior Ct. 44 . Moreover, the stenographer must testify as to the integrity of his or her notes and the transcript thereof: Commonwealth v. … That statute, as was said by this Court, in Freedman v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.
Cited 9 timesPublished3 Binn. 114 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1810
In the case of Sims’s Lessee v. Irwin, the Supreme Court of the United States decided, that an estate of this kind, was in all respects the same as a complete legal estate. … But this was his own folly; because he had full notice of the plaintiff’s claim, as appears by the caveat and proceedings before the board.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPhilip Haibach Contracting Co. v. Hornung
270 Pa. 350 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1921
We have frequently held and recently repeated that unless we can say the action of the court in refusing judgment on rules of this character is clearly erroneous and free from doubt, its order will not be disturbed: Brown … et al. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished547 Pa. 577 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1997
Griffin v. … Hendrickson v. Pennsylvania State Board of Parole, 409 Pa. 204 , 185 A.2d 581 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 817 , 83 S.Ct. 1713 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1963).
Cited 85 timesPublished10 Serg. & Rawle 243 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1823
A survey was made, a caveat entered by Andrews, and a decision of the board of property in favour of Howard, but no patent was issued. … This board possesses no judicial power: they are bare agents: their acts, where >they exceed their authority, void, liké the acts of all other agents. In Bixler v.
Cited 1 timesPublished320 Pa. Super. 281 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1983
Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 35 Pa.Cmwlth. 7, 11 , 384 A.2d 1017, 1019 (1978); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. DelCimmuto, 23 Pa.Cmwlth. 43, 45-46 , 350 A.2d 459, 460 (1976). See also: Plummer v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, supra, 62 Pa.Cmwlth. at 559 , 437 A.2d at 463 ; Davis v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMiddletown Township v. Delaware County Institution District
450 Pa. 282 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1973
On September 22, 1971, after a hearing on these applications and a mutually agreed to delay, the Zoning Hearing Board informed the Institution District that the Board had no jurisdiction to issue either the special exception … Appellant also argues that this Court’s decision in School District of Philadelphia v. Zoning Board of Ad justment, 417 Pa. 277 , 207 A. 2d 864 (1965), controls here.
Cited 16 timesPublished473 Pa. 445 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1977
Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964) ; Wong Sun v. … As the United States Supreme Court in Brown v.
Cited 24 timesPublished32 Pa. 194 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858
It was not called so by the board of- directors, nor entered upon their minutes as such. … Rep. 451 ; repeated more fully in 3 Burr. 1456; Key v. Goodwin, 4 Moore & Payne 341-51; see also Butler v. Palmer, 1 Hill 324 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedCommonwealth v. Jackson, K., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2023
In Brown v. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 51-52.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCommonwealth v. Alpha Epsilon Pi
373 Pa. Super. 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1988
Commonwealth v. Brown, 346 Pa. 192 , 29 A.2d 793 (1943), relied upon by Appellant, involved two acts of assembly (the Penal Code and Election Code). Likewise, Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Bidner, 282 Pa.Super. 100 , 422 A.2d 847 (1980), like Brown I, supra, involved the Election Code and the Crimes Code. Finally, Commonwealth v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedLivingston v. Vanguard Federal Savings Bank
386 Pa. Super. 496 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 1989
Toolan v. Trevose Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n, 501 Pa. 477 , 462 A.2d 224 (1983), citing Jones v. … Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., supra, quoting Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 435 U.S. 151, 157 , 98 S.Ct. 988, 994 , 55 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978), quoting Rice v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMitchell v. Chester Housing Authority
389 Pa. 314 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1957
: McCormick v. … In McCormick v.
Cited 44 timesPublished
Ask Donna