Case law

In Re: Condemn by City of Phila. Airport Bus. Ctr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2026

Id. 4 Parties generally were required to raise questions of law regarding the board’s report via exceptions. See Kellman Trust v. Com., Dep’t of Transp., 354 A.2d 583, 590 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1976) (en banc). … V, § 4.

Harris, D., Pet v. City of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2022

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v

Bank of America v. DeSue, J.(WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2022

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOANNE DESUE : No. 194 WAL 2022 : : v … Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court BANK OF AMERICA (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

West Penn Power Co. v. Cohen

502 Pa. 25 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1983

The Board has properly refused to make refunds on those petitions filed more than five years after payment. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. v. … Board of Finance and Revenue, 402 Pa. 511 , 166 A.2d 656 (1961); Calvert Distillers Corp. v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 376 Pa. 476 , 103 A.2d 668 (1954). Subsequent to our decision in Commonwealth v.

DeSue, J. v. Bank of America (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2022

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOANNE DESUE : No. 194 WAL 2022 : : v … Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court BANK OF AMERICA (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

Great Leopard Market Corp. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen

413 Pa. 143 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1964

Co. v. Local Union No. 830, 408 Pa. 380 , 184 A. 2d 243 (1962); Local 100, etc. v. Borden, 373 U.S. 690 (1963); Local No. 207, etc. v. Perko, 373 U.S. 701 (1963). But see Retail Clerks v. … In Smith’s Transfer Corporation v.

Fetterolf, S., Pet.v. ZHB of Sewickley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 2021

: : : ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE : BOROUGH OF SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, : : Respondent … : : : ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE : BOROUGH OF SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS, : : Respondent

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jackson

536 Pa. 26 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1994

Thus, we are not bound by the findings of either the Hearing Committee or the Disciplinary Board. Matter of Green, 470 Pa. 164 , 368 A.2d 245 (1977); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … Matter of Green, supra; Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Walker, supra; Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell, supra.

Eberst v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

334 Pa. 505 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1939

We see no necessity, after the many hearings had before the various referees and the Workmen’s Compensation Board, of returning this case for further evidence. See Easton v. Elk Tanning Co., 129 Pa. … It is this which primarily moves us to remand the record.” 4 Shetina v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 112 ; Reichner v. Blakiston’s Sons & Co. et al., 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 415 ; Reddicks v.

Kerchner, Marshall & Co. v. Pittsburgh

406 Pa. 158 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1962

. *161 In Commonwealth v. … The clear import of the Paper Products Company case, as well as Brown & Zortman Machinery Co. v.

Navios Corp. v. National Maritime Union of America

402 Pa. 325 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1960

In Bartholomew v. … Gerradin v. United Fruit Co., 2 Cir., 1932, 60 F. 2d 927 , certiorari denied 287 U. S. 642 , 53 S. Ct. 92 , 77 L. Ed. 556 ; Carroll v. United States, 2 Cir., 1943, 133 F. 2d 690 ; Zielinski v.

McMullan v. WOHLGEMUTH

453 Pa. 147 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1973

Powers and Duties of County Boards of Assistance. … In Sheppard v.

Potters National Bank v. Ohio Township

260 Pa. 104 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1918

The language used in Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. Corry, 197 Pa. 41 , is pertinent to the question here involved. … Parol evidence was consequently admissible to supply the deficiencies of the record of the meeting and explain or supplement them: Hamill v. Supreme Council of The Royal Arcanum, 152 Pa. 537 ; Rose v.

Commonwealth v. Bright

303 Pa. Super. 98 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 1982

Brant, 272 Pa.Super. 135, 141 , 414 A.2d 707, 710 (1979); Commonwealth v. Sinor, supra 264 Pa.Super. at 183 n.5, 399 A.2d at 727 n.5; Commonwealth v. Brown, 252 Pa.Super. 365, 369 , 381 A.2d 961, 963 (1977). … Brown, supra 252 Pa.Super. at 368-369 , 381 A.2d at 963 ; Commonwealth v. Gibson, 248 Pa.Super. 348, 352 , 375 A.2d 132, 133 (1977).

Keyes v. New York, Ontario & Western Ry. Co.

265 Pa. 105 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1919

Justice Moschzisker in Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Company, 264 Pa. 529 . As there was no hearing de novo by the board, the case rests upon the facts found by the referee (McCauley v. … The judgment of the court below is reversed and the award of the referee, as affirmed by the compensation board, is reinstated.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Blatt

79 Pa. D. & C.4th 193 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2005

The board stated that it reached this conclusion after carefully reviewing the implications of the Supreme Court’s order in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … The Supreme Court did not concur with the board’s recommendation and ordered that the lawyer be suspended for one year and one day. (52) In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Atlas, no. 171 D.B. 2001, 68 D.

Middletown Township v. Delaware County Institution District

450 Pa. 282 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1973

On September 22, 1971, after a hearing on these applications and a mutually agreed to delay, the Zoning Hearing Board informed the Institution District that the Board had no jurisdiction to issue either the special exception … Appellant also argues that this Court’s decision in School District of Philadelphia v. Zoning Board of Ad justment, 417 Pa. 277 , 207 A. 2d 864 (1965), controls here.

Commonwealth v. Sushinskie

242 Pa. 406 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1913

Com., 76 Pa. 414 ; Clark v. Com., 123 Pa. 555 ; Com. v. Roddy, 184 Pa. 274 ; Com. v. Eagen, 190 Pa. 10 ; Com. v. … This has been held in several cases: Ortwein v. Com., 26 P. F. Smith 414; Lynch v. Com., 27 Id. 205 ; Brown v. Com., 28 Id. 122.

Commonwealth v. Alpha Epsilon Pi

373 Pa. Super. 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1988

Commonwealth v. Brown, 346 Pa. 192 , 29 A.2d 793 (1943), relied upon by Appellant, involved two acts of assembly (the Penal Code and Election Code). Likewise, Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Bidner, 282 Pa.Super. 100 , 422 A.2d 847 (1980), like Brown I, supra, involved the Election Code and the Crimes Code. Finally, Commonwealth v.

Delaware County v. WCAB

983 A.2d 1250 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 2009

983 A.2d 1250 (2009) DELAWARE COUNTY v. W.C.A.B. (BROWNE). No. 197 MAL (2009). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. August 18, 2009. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.