Case law

ODC v. John E. Gomolchak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2015

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2157 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : Nos. 2 DB 2015 v … File quarterly written reports on a Board approved form with the Secretary of the Board; and e. Immediately report to the Secretary of the Board any violations of the terms and conditions of probation.

B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corp.

291 Pa. 185 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1927

the usual course pursued *187 under such, circumstances, we will not disturb the order under attack; nor shall we discuss the legal questions in the case “till an opportunity is had to fully develop the facts at trial”: Brown … v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kanuck

517 Pa. 160 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 24, 1987

Thus, we are not bound by the findings of the Hearing Committee or the Disciplinary Board, except as guidelines for judging the credibility of witnesses. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … In our decision of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Smith v. Thorne

9 Watts 144 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1839

Bank of Montgomery v. Walker, 9 Serg. & Rawle 229 ; Hubbly v. Brown, 16 Johns. 69 . Then, without his evidence, the defendant has no case.

Baur v. Mesta MacHine Co.

405 Pa. 617 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1961

The Compensation Board found that he had and that there was no “accident” within the definition adopted by the Supreme Court in Baur v. Mesta, supra. … Baur v. Mesta Machine Co., 393 Pa. 380, 384 . Much stress is placed by the Superior Court upon the finding made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board.

Commonwealth ex rel. Wilson v. Banmiller

393 Pa. 530 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1958

However, the aforesaid principles which had been considered well settled are. now subject to this qualification : Habeas corpus will be granted if the defendant was. for any reason deprived of due process: Brown v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. supra; Commonwealth ex rel. Richter v. Burke, 175 Pa. Superior Ct. 255 , 103 A. 2d 293 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Comer v. Maroney, 178 Pa. Superior.Ct. 633, 116 A. 2d 301 .

People's Building, Loan & Saving Ass'n v. Berlin

201 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1901

Co. v. Hilton, 5 Pa. … See also Kilgore v.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Orsini

368 Pa. 259 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1951

Annenberg v. Roberts, 333 Pa. 203 , 2 A. 2d 612 ; Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 304 U. S. 375 , 58 S. Ct. 963 ; Jones v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 298 U.S. 1 , 56 S. Ct. 654 ; Harriman v. … Bowles, Adm’r., v. Baer, 142 F. 2d 787 ; Genecov v. Federal Petroleum Board, 146 F. 2d 596 ; In re Securities and Exchange Commission, 84 F. 2d 316 ; Woolley v. United States, 97 F. 2d 258, 262 .

Glase Estate

384 Pa. 118 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1956

It was a boarding school which was founded in 1891, with a maximum capacity of 60 students. … It is a private boarding school managed by a Board of Directors and receives pupils between 3 years and 21 years old.

Hague v. City of Philadelphia

48 Pa. 527 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1865

without the consent first had and obtained of a majority of said county board.” … The principle of this case has been decided and strongly enforced in Lehigh County v.

City of Scranton v. Scranton Railway Co.

268 Pa. 200 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1920

Chief Justice Brown, The bill of the City of Scranton was dismissed by the learned chancellor especially presiding, because he was of opinion that jurisdiction of the complaint was in the Public Service Commission in the … Clair Borough v. Tamaqua & Pottsville Electric Railway Company, 259 Pa. 462 . Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Collins v. Kephart

271 Pa. 428 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1921

Hysong v. Gallitzin Borough School District, 164 Pa. 629, 640-43 , throws some light upon the points in this case, though not much; and we may say as to Bradfield v. Roberts, 175 U. … We are always loath to put a construction on legislation which shows it to be invalid (Miller v. Belmont P. & R.

Commonwealth v. Molycorp, Inc.

481 Pa. 208 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1978

Accord, Commonwealth v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., supra; Stilman v. Tax Review Board, 402 Pa. 492 , 166 A.2d 661 (1961). … In Cumberland Coal v. Board of Revision, supra, the county board of revision was authorized to tax unmined coal in the county at a uniform percentage of the in-ground value of the coal.

Omatick v. Cecil Twp. of: Omatick, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 2023

OMATICK : No. 315 WAL 2022 : : v. … : Court CECIL TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING : BOARD : : : v

Goodheart v. Casey

523 Pa. 188 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1989

Wright v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, 390 Pa. 75, 79 , 134 A.2d 231, 233 (1957) (footnotes omitted). … State Board of Cosmetology, 418 Pa. 225 , 210 A.2d 495 (1965); Bargain City U.S.A., Inc. v. Dilworth, 407 Pa. 129 , 179 A.2d 439 (1962); Costello v.

Petrizzo v. ZHB of Middle Smithfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2015

: v. … : REGINA : v.

Perit v. Cohen

4 Whart. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1839

Brown, the witness produced by the plaintiff below, to prove the submission and award set forth in his declaration; and upon the establishment of which, his right to recover depended. … The evidence rejected by the Court below and mentioned in the first bill of exception, does not therefore fall within the rule laid down in Ellmaker v. Buckley.

Precht, P., Aplt. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2026

This Court recently considered the propriety of the positive steps test in Lowman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 235 A.3d 278 (Pa. 2020). … V.

ODC v. John Andrew Klamo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2017

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2340 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 90 DB 2015 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Jonnet v. Bodick

431 Pa. 59 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 1968

of Montgomery v. … Montgomery v.