Case law

Hudgins v. Jewel T Discount Store

351 Pa. Super. 329 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1986

See Brown v. … See generally Franklin Interiors, Inc. v. Browns Lane, Inc., 227 Pa.Super. 252 , 323 A.2d 226 (1974). . The equities not otherwise being clear, see Balk v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kanuck

517 Pa. 160 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 24, 1987

Thus, we are not bound by the findings of the Hearing Committee or the Disciplinary Board, except as guidelines for judging the credibility of witnesses. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … In our decision of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Mazin v. BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS

599 Pa. 684 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 2008

MAZIN, D.D.S., Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS; BASIL L. … MARINAK, D.D.S., JOHN V. REITZ, D.M.D., ALLAN M. HORWITZ, ESQ., GWENDOLYN M. WHITE, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS OF THE STATE BOARD OF DENTISTRY; AND VEASEY B.

Clearfield Cheese Co. v. United Stone & Allied Products Workers of America

378 Pa. 144 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1954

In Pinsky v. … Board has taken jurisdiction "in', this case is denied or-that this Court recognized-the National Labor. Relations -Board had taken, jurisdiction. That averment is also denied.

ODC v. Jeff Lee Lewin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2019

PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2617 Disciplinary Board No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 11 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217, and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Kungsgaten, Inc. v. Philadelphia

422 Pa. 209 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1966

The assessment was sustained by the Philadelphia Tax Review Board and Kungsgaten appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which reversed the board and set aside the assessment. … We are of the view that the disposition of this appeal is controlled by our decisions in Shelburne Sportswear, Inc. v. Philadelphia, 422 Pa. 199 , 220 A. 2d 798 (1966), decided today, and Tax Review Board v.

Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Enforcement v. Kelly's Bar, Inc.

536 Pa. 310 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1994

Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Kelly’s Bar, Inc., t/a Kelly’s Bar, 147 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 710, 609 A.2d 630 (1992). … Based upon its de novo review, it may sustain, alter, change, modify or amend the board’s action whether or not it makes findings which are materially different from those found by the Board or the Administrative Law Judge

Defense Plant Corp. Tax Assessment Case

350 Pa. 520 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1944

National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 U. S. 111 , determining what Congress meant by the word “employes” in the Wagner Act, was also referred to. … Senator Brown, contains the following relevant sentence: ‘The only qualification of these exemptions provides that real property of the Corporation is to be subject to non discriminatory State and local taxes.’ ” In the brief

Burton v. Erie County

206 Pa. 570 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1903

The scope of legislative power over counties is so fully discussed in Phila. v. Fox, 64 Pa. 169 , by Justice Shabswood that any repetition here is unnecessary. … for the board of the prisoners so committed.

Lyon v. Strock

274 Pa. 541 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1922

Board *544 of Trustees, 133 Ill. 443, 476 ; Kennebec Water Dist. v. City of Waterville, 96 Maine 234, 255 ;......Ex parte City of Newport, 141 Ky. 329 , 37 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1034 (see p. 1108); Adams v. … Y. 52, 57 ; Board of Education of City of Huron v. National Life Ins. Co., 94 Fed. Rep. 324, 327;...... Dillon on Municipal Corporations, 5th ed., vol. 1, p. 346, s. 192.

Philadelphia v. Budney

396 Pa. 87 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1959

Appellant now seeks to use this proceeding to raise the same issue after it had been previously raised before the board ■ of adjustment and after the appeal from the board’s decision had been dismissed by the court' *89 of … Baederwood Center, Inc. v. Putney, 390 Pa. 53 , 133 A. 2d 836 (1957) ; Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Company v. Clairton, 390 Pa. 1 , 133 A. 2d 542 (1957).

Reeser's Milk Co. v. Pates

320 Pa. 11 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1935

In Staryeu v. … But in Skelton v.

Commonwealth v. Fisher

485 Pa. 8 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1979

During this questioning, Fisher walked to the far side of Officer Brown’s vehicle and bent down. … See Commonwealth v. Cartagena, 482 Pa. 6, 28 , 393 A.2d 350, 361 (1978) (plurality opinion).

In Re Reading School Board Election

535 Pa. 32 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1993

of 7, 645 votes for the seat on the School Board. … Perles v. Northumberland Co.

Coleman v. Pawelec

500 Pa. 511 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1983

Petrash Guardianship

425 Pa. 433 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1967

This board petitioned the Court of Common Pleas of Carbon County for the appointment of a guardian to prosecute Miss Petrash’s cause *435 of action against Steele so as to create a fund from which the board could reimburse … As late as 1948, this Court said in Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

Betters v. Beaver Co., Greene Twp Pet of Beaver Co

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 2019

: : : v. … : MCILWAIN, CHIEF ASSESSOR : GREENE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : SUPERVISORS, HOPEWELL : TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : COMMISSIONERS, AND POTTER : TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS :

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Knepp

497 Pa. 396 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1982

The matter was referred to the Disciplinary Board (Board) on May 29, 1981. … Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lewis, 493 Pa. 519 , 426 A.2d 1138 (1981); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Herman, 493 Pa. 267 , 426 A.2d 101 (1981); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Orsini

368 Pa. 259 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1951

Annenberg v. Roberts, 333 Pa. 203 , 2 A. 2d 612 ; Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 304 U. S. 375 , 58 S. Ct. 963 ; Jones v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 298 U.S. 1 , 56 S. Ct. 654 ; Harriman v. … Bowles, Adm’r., v. Baer, 142 F. 2d 787 ; Genecov v. Federal Petroleum Board, 146 F. 2d 596 ; In re Securities and Exchange Commission, 84 F. 2d 316 ; Woolley v. United States, 97 F. 2d 258, 262 .

Packer, A. v. State Bd. of Nursing

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2015

No. 473 WAL 2014 : Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND : OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS, : DEPARTMENT OF STATE, STATE : BOARD OF NURSING, :