Case law

Pittsburgh & Connelsville Railroad v. Clarke & Thaw

29 Pa. 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1857

Rep. 579 ; Newton v. Bridgeport Turnpike Company, 3 Conn. Rep. 544 ; Oxford Turnpike Company v. Bunnell, 6 Conn. 552 . … So, where the assent of the board is required by a by-law only, the execution of the by-law may be modified by the practice of the corporation : Insurance Company v. Smith, 1 Jones 126 .

Hollinger v. Department of Public Welfare

469 Pa. 358 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1976

National Labor Relations Board v. Injection Molding Co., 211 F.2d 59, 65 (8th Cir. 1954). … This case presents no problem of preemption by the federal government acting through the National Labor Relations Board. See San Diego Trades Council, etc. v.

Commonwealth v. Evans

343 Pa. Super. 118 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1985

. *135 The Commonwealth cites the recent case of Commonwealth v. … However, the panel also noted in dicta that “in Commonwealth v.

Jacob, K. v. UCBR of: UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 2016

Compensation Board of : Review at No. … See Peak v.

Beaver, Bare & Co. v. Bare

104 Pa. 58 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 1883

Cyphert, 3 Casey 220; he may let them go fine from his service, whenever he chooses, no matter whether he be solvent or insolvent: Holdship v. Patterson, 7 Watts 547 ; Brown’s Appeal, 5 Norris 524. … In the case of Kauffelt v.

Orr's Appeal

67 Pa. 195 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1871

It was evidently the turning point in Brown v. Finney, 3 P. F. Smith 373. In that case there was no disagreement as to terms, and if Brown had accepted Finney’s check for $16,000, the agreement would have been complete. … It was not merely a purchase and sale of the half interest in the boat — n'ot like the alleged contract in Brown v.

National Union Bank v. Shearer

225 Pa. 470 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1909

Justice Brown, The Act of September 24, 1866, P. … We have defined him to be “one who receives and stores goods as a business for a compensation or profit:” Bucher v. Com., 103 Pa. 528 ; Tradesmen’s Nat. Bank v. Jagode, 186 Pa. 556 .

Barth v. Philadelphia School District

393 Pa. 557 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1958

In Wilson et ux. v. Phila. … Harris v. Board of Public Education, 306 Pa. 546 , 160 A. 443 , relied upon by the City and the School *565 District, furnishes no basis or support for the present Agreement.

Fumo v. City of Philadelphia

601 Pa. 322 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2009

. § 1204, challenging the Gaming-Board’s Order and Adjudication. On July 17, 2007, the Gaming Board’s Order and Adjudication was affirmed by this Court. Riverwalk Casino v. Pa. … See also Goode v.

Commonwealth v. Hosack

485 Pa. 128 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1979

In Commonwealth v. … or by the Pardon Board in a sentence which has been reduced by commutation . . . .’

Landis v. Robacker

313 Pa. 271 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1933

The mortgage is extinguished by law: Brown v. Simpson, 2 Watts 233 ; Koons v. Hartman, 7 Watts 20 ; Henderson, Hull & Co. v. Stryker, 164 Pa. 170 ; Frank v. … As stated in Brown v. Simpson, supra, at page 245.

Kavanagh v. London Grove Township

486 Pa. 133 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1979

Bilbar Construction Co. v. Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 62 , 141 A.2d 851 (1958). The burden of establishing its invalidity is upon the party who seeks to have it declared invalid. Beaver Gas Co. v. … Lutz v. Armour, 395 Pa. 576, 578-79 , 151 A.2d 108, 110 (1959); Atria, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, 438 Pa. 317 , 264 A.2d 609 (1970).

Commonwealth v. Ward

340 Pa. Super. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1985

In a case very much on point, Cunningham v. … Commonwealth v. Rohde, 485 Pa. 404 , 402 A.2d 1025 (1979); Commonwealth v. Sheehan, 446 Pa. 35 , 285 A.2d 465 (1971).

Brinton v. Kerr

320 Pa. 62 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1935

We definitely state again that the title to office cannot be tested by mandamus ( Com. v. James, 214 Pa. 319 ), injunction (Eddy v. … Gibson, 316 Pa. 429 , 434; Williams's App., 312 Pa. 477, 479 ; Com. ex rel. v. Conroy, 267 Pa. 518 ; Hutchinson v. Goshorn, 256 Pa. 69 .

Commonwealth v. Boxley

575 Pa. 611 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2003

Neil Hoffman, M.D., a board-certified forensic pathologist who was qualified as an expert at trial, testified Bolton died from a gunshot wound to the chest. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 551 Pa. 465 , 711 A.2d 444, 449 (1998). At trial, Melendez testified appellant and Black shot at Bolton, N.T., 10/18/00, at 689, who later died from gunshot *618 wounds to the chest.

Davis v. Smith

262 Pa. 432 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1918

board. … It has been judicially determined that the findings of fact by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, upon appeal from a referee, are final and cannot be disturbed by the courts: Poluskiewicz v.

Phipps v. Kirk

333 Pa. 478 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1939

L. 1173, while appellees’ appeals to the board and the lower court were pending. … Co. v.

Reilly v. Walker Bros.

425 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1967

As we said in Shydlinski v. … See Shore v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa., 389 Pa. 445 , 133 A. 2d 157 (1957).

County of Allegheny v. Commonwealth

518 Pa. 556 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1988

mandatory injunctive relief requiring the Pennsyl *558 vania Department of Corrections (Department) and the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) to accept custody of state-sentenced inmates who were sentenced … Intraworld Inc. v. Girard Trust Bank, 461 Pa. 343 , 336 A.2d 316 (1975); Credit Alliance Corp. v. Philadelphia Minit-Man Car Wash Corp., 450 Pa. 367 , 301 A.2d 816 (1973); Zebra v.

Smith v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

284 Pa. 35 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 12, 1925

Claimant’s counsel cites to us Stahl v. … In Onofrey v.