Case law

Butler Township School District v. Butler City School District

374 Pa. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1953

This agreement shall be effective upon approval by a majority vote of the City of Butler School Board and the Butler Township School Board. … See Toye v. Exeter Borough School District, 225 *100 Pa. 236, 74 A. 60 .

Commonwealth v. Kunselman

363 Pa. Super. 475 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1987

Also see Commonwealth v. … Com *481 monwealth v. Yoder, 249 Pa.Super. 389 , 378 A.2d 350 (1977). The function of a minimum sentence is to notify board of parole when it may exercise its discretion to parole an individual. Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Baker

212 Pa. 230 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1905

In Pittsburg, etc., Railroad Co. v. … Our attention has been called to the cáse of York County v.

Green Party of Pennsylvania v. Department of State Bureau of Commissions

168 A.3d 123 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2017

Citing to Carroll v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions and Retirement Municipal Pension Fund, 735 A.2d 141, 144 (Pa. … Firefighters’ Union, Local 22 v. City of Phila., 632 Pa. 243 , 119 A.3d 296 (2015).

Hanna v. Clark

189 Pa. 321 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1899

But it had been decided long before the passage of that act that an equitable estate is sufficient in Pennsylvania to sustain a partition even at law : Willing v. Brown, 7 S. & R. 467; Longwell v. Bentley, 23 Pa. 99 . … An equitable estate is sufficient in Pennsylvania to support a partition even at law; it is sufficient to show a clear equitable right to the relief prayed for: Willing v. Brown, 7 S. & R. 467; Longwell v.

Williams v. Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Local No. 2

384 Pa. 413 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1956

There it was held that plaintiff members of defendant union were improperly convicted on appeal by the International Executive Board after acquittal by the Local trial board, and consequently were entitled to wages lost through … To the same effect are Williston on Contracts, Revised Edition, §1359; Restatement, Agency, §455, comment d; Martin v. Board of Education of Lincoln County, 120 W. Va. 621 , 199 S.E. 887 ; San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v.

United Steelworkers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

413 Pa. 358 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1964

Co., 406 Pa. 573, 577 , 178 A. 2d 748 ; Baxter v. Philadelphia, 385 Pa. 424, 427 , 123 A. 2d 634 ; Kittaning Coal Co. v. Moore, 362 Pa. 128 , 66 A. 2d 273 ). … See also: Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Local 1790, 304 F. 2d 449 .

Strassburger v. Philadelphia Record Co.

335 Pa. 485 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 16, 1939

L. 364, section 308, 15 PS section 2852-308; Ruby v. Penn Fiber Board Corp., 326 Pa. 582 , 192 A. 914 ; Moore v. Steinman Hardware Co., 319 Pa. 430 , 179 A. 565 ; Davis v. Cambria Title etc. … Co., 304 Pa. 32 , 155 A. 108 ; Conerty v. Butler County Oil Co., 301 Pa. 417 , 152 A. 672 ; Hodder v. George Hogg Co., 223 Pa. 196 , 72 A. 553 ; Kuhbach v. Irving Cut Glass Co., 220 Pa. 427 , 69 A. 981 ; Com. v.

Nationwide Mutual v. Domiano, T.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2020

Order of the Superior Court : Petitioners : : : v … BROWN, RICHARD E.

M. Manor Holding, LP v. Monroe Cnty. Tax Claim Bureau

202 A.3d 39 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2019

Blair v. M'Kee

6 Serg. & Rawle 193 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1820

This case has a very striking resemblance to that of Caufman v. … The surveyor, in 1814, had no right to garble the land at his will and pleasure, and he should have returned the matter specially to the Board of Property. Merchant and Bright v. Millison, & Sm. L. 165.

Dunlap v. Larkin

342 Pa. Super. 594 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1985

Section 708 does not specifically or by implication authorize transfers between courts and local zoning hearing boards. Harris v. … Township of Reserve v. Zoning Hearing Board, 78 Pa.Commonwealth 496, 502, 468 A.2d 872, 875 (1983). Even if the transfer were valid, the granting of a stay would not be “automatic.”

Pittsburgh & Connelsville Railroad v. Clarke & Thaw

29 Pa. 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1857

Rep. 579 ; Newton v. Bridgeport Turnpike Company, 3 Conn. Rep. 544 ; Oxford Turnpike Company v. Bunnell, 6 Conn. 552 . … So, where the assent of the board is required by a by-law only, the execution of the by-law may be modified by the practice of the corporation : Insurance Company v. Smith, 1 Jones 126 .

In Re the Franklin Township Board of Supervisors

475 Pa. 65 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1977

Act of February 14, 1866, P.L. 28, § 1, 12 P.S. § 1101 (1953); Rosenzweig v. … See generally Bell v.

Ramey Bor. v. Com., Dept. of Env. Res.

466 Pa. 45 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1976

See Sanitary Water Board v. … Alessandroni v. Borough of Confluence, 427 Pa. 540 , 234 A.2d 852 (1967), an action in mandamus to require compliance with an order of the Sanitary Water Board.

ODC, Pet v. William C. Kerr, III

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2016

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2306 DiSCip|inary DOCket NO. 3 Petitioner : No. 9 DB 2015 v. : Attorney Registration No. 90668 W|LLlAl\/| C. … Such reports shall be forwarded to the Secretary of the Disciplinary Board and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel; and 4.

Jacob, K. v. UCBR of: UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 2016

Compensation Board of : Review at No. … See Peak v.

LeGare v. COM., UNEMPLOY. COMP. BD. OF REV.

498 Pa. 72 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 3, 1982

Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 496 Pa. 620 at 625 , 437 A.2d 1213 at 1215 (1981); Frumento v. … (hearsay may not support a Board finding unless supported by competent evidence) [3] ; Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 27 Pa.Cmwlth. 522 , 367 A.2d 366 (1976).

Hollinger v. Department of Public Welfare

469 Pa. 358 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1976

National Labor Relations Board v. Injection Molding Co., 211 F.2d 59, 65 (8th Cir. 1954). … This case presents no problem of preemption by the federal government acting through the National Labor Relations Board. See San Diego Trades Council, etc. v.

Fiore v. Commonwealth

507 Pa. 134 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1985