Case law

In Re: Order Modifying § 4 of the Pennsylvania Continuing Legal Education Board Regulations

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 2020

: : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2020, upon the recommendation of the Continuing Legal Education (“CLE”) Board … , IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, and Rule 1952(A) of the Rules of Judicial Administration, that § 4 of the Pennsylvania Continuing Legal Education Board Regulations

McCoy v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.

275 Pa. 422 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1923

, which affirmed the finding of the referee; on appeal to the court below, the board was reversed and compensation refused; the present appeal by plaintiff followed. … We state the question here as it was before the court below, is, Is there any evidence in the case on which the findings and award of the board can legally rest? In Fink v.

Commonwealth v. Edwards

431 Pa. 44 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 1968

Commonwealth v. Plubell, 367 Pa. 452, 457 , 80 A. 2d 825 (1951) and cases cited therein; see also Commonwealth v. Brown, 388 Pa. 613 , 131 A. 2d 367 (1957) and Commonwealth v. Knable, 369 Pa. 171 , 85 A. 2d 114 (1952). … Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, at page 616; Commonwealth v. Knable, supra, at page 175; and cases cited therein. The question is what are proper instructions.

Flagiello v. Pennsylvania Hospital

417 Pa. 486 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1965

v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , which, in 1953, repudiated the “separate but equal doctrine” laid down in Plessy v.

Maguire v. James Lees & Sons Co.

273 Pa. 85 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1922

In Lupfer v. … In Callihan v.

Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co. v. Scheckter

400 Pa. 405 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1960

A resolution by the board of directors will suffice. See Howell v. McCloskey, supra; Irving Trust Co. v. Deutsch, 73 F. 2d 121 (2nd Cir. 1934) ; Kimmell v. Geeting, 2 Grant 125 (1853). … Under the appellee’s own by-laws, 5 as well as the law of Maine, this would have required action by the directors acting as a board, and not singularly. Peirce v. Morse-Oliver Bldg.

Mosaica Academy Charter School v. Commonwealth, Department of Education

813 A.2d 813 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2002

Pappas v. Asbel, 555 Pa. 342 , 724 A.2d 889 (1998). … In Kelmo Enterprises Inc. v.

Pinkins, R., Aplt. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 2021

: Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered May : 11, 2020 at No. 793 CD 2019, v … : affirming the Order of the Board of : Probation and Parole mailed May : 20, 2019 at Parole

Commonwealth v. Jackson

461 Pa. 632 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1975

Sgro v. United States, 287 U.S. 206, 210 , 53 S.Ct. 138 , 77 L.Ed. 260 (1932); Commonwealth v. Eazer, 455 Pa. 320, 323 , 312 A.2d 398 (1973); Commonwealth v. … As this Court noted in Commonwealth v.

In Re Appeal of Elocin, Inc.

501 Pa. 348 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1983

National Land and Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of Adjustment, 419 Pa. 504 , 215 A.2d 597 (1965). … In Surrick v.

Cullen Appeal

392 Pa. 602 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1958

Because of errors apparent on the face of the returns, the county board of elections, sitting as the return board, opened and recounted the ballots in the boxes of 11 of the county’s 71 election districts. … See Kaufman Construction Company v.

Gibraltar Rock v. DEP Apl of: New Hanover Twp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2022

Robinson by Robinson v. … See Bisher v.

C. L. McClain Fuel Corp. v. Lineinger

341 Pa. 364 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1941

The corporation contends that these assignments were made by its president without authority from the board of directors. … The order of the court discharging the rule of the legal-plaintiff on the use-plaintiff is also affirmed. 1 Presbyterian Board v. Gilbee, 212 Pa. 310, 314 , 61 A. 925, 926 ; Hartzell v.

Hendel Appeal

403 Pa. 635 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 1961

Both Hendel and the board have appealed from this order. • Hendel’s contention is that the board should have considered his intention to completely raze and demolish the theatre portion'of the premises since he followed through … The court made this reduction despite the lack of competent evidence to show that the board’s valuation was contrary to or in disregard of the owner’s rights. See Chatfield v.

Centennial School District v. Commonwealth Department of Education

517 Pa. 540 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1988

Shanberg v. Comm. Secretary of Ed., 57 Pa.Comwlth.Ct. 384, 426 A.2d 232, 233 (1981). Secretary’s Opinion at 10. … In Scott S. v.

In Re: Prospect Crozer for the BAA of Del Co

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT IN RE: APPEAL OF PROSPECT CROZER : No. 35 MM 2022 LLC FROM THE DECISION OF THE : BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS OF : DELAWARE COUNTY … : CHESTER UPLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT, : No. 37 MM 2022 : Petitioner : : : v

In Re: Amendment of Rule 219 of The Pennsylvania Rules Of Disciplinary Enforcement

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 2016

[/]) and by written or oral request to the Board. … the Board unpaid

Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Fricke

152 Pa. 231 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1893

v. … One of the offending sections provided for appointment, by the court, of a lawyer to act in conjunction with the board of viewers in assessing damages, etc. In Weinman v.

Koehnlein v. Allegheny County Employees' Retirement System

373 Pa. 535 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1953

County v. … Thomson v.

FOAC v. City of Hbg, Aplts.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 2021

In O’Connor v. … In Yocum v.