Case law

United States Steel Corp. Tax Assessment Case

436 Pa. 435 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1970

Deitch Company v. Board of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 213, 221-2 , 209 A. 2d 397, 402 (1965); see, also, F. W. Woolworth Tax Assessment Case, 426 Pa. 583 , 235 A. 2d 793 (1967). … In its first opinion, the lower court, citing Glen Alden Coal Company v.

Goldman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

618 Pa. 501 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2012

Healthy v. … Cohens v.

Thompson's Appeal

271 Pa. 225 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1921

From the assessor’s returns there were appeals to the Board of Revision, which, after a hearing, fixed the valuations. Appeals were then taken from the action of the board to the court of common pleas. … This does not conflict with the principles laid down in Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Northumberland Co. Commissioners, 229 Pa. 460 ; Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v.

Moon Township Appeal

387 Pa. 144 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1956

, all of which was placed by the Board in the tax exempt column. … Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 377 Pa. 274, 282-284 , 105 A. 2d 165, 169 ; West View Borough Municipal Authority Appeal, 381 Pa. 416 , 113 A. 2d 307 ; Freeport School District v.

Southeastern Greene Joint School District v. Dunkard Township School District

396 Pa. 209 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1959

Detweiler v. Hatfield Borough School District, 376 Pa. 555 . “What the Court said in Slippery Rock Area Joint School System v. … On this question, the action, of the individual board no longer has any specific impact on the individual district. It is an impact by the action of the joint board over all the member districts.

ODC v. Richard S. Ross

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2018

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2443 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 42 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Stoever v. Gowen

280 Pa. 424 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 12, 1924

Phila., 177 Pa. 801 ), or use some like expression: Pittsburgh v. Epping-Carpenter Co., 194 Pa. 318 ; Garvey v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co., 213 Pa. 177 ; O’Donnell v. Pittsburgh, 234 Pa. 401 ; Tesson v. … Here, however, it is averred in the bill that the dedication was “accepted by the board of surveyors” and the deed of dedication recorded.

In Re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating Grand Jury

596 Pa. 378 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 2007

The Board’s licensing determination was subsequently upheld on direct appeal to this Court. Pocono Manor Investors, L.P. v. PGCB, 592 Pa. 625 , 927 A.2d 209 (2007). The Honorable Edward M. … See Petition of Specter, 455 Pa. 518, 519 , 317 A.2d 286, 287 (1974) (citing United States v. Ryan, 402 U.S. 530, 532-33 , 91 S.Ct. 1580, 1581-82 , 29 L.Ed.2d 85 (1971); Cobbledick v.

Koehnlein v. Allegheny County Employees' Retirement System

373 Pa. 535 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1953

County v. … Thomson v.

Cary v. Lower Merion School District

362 Pa. 310 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1949

Justice Horace Stern, This mandamus proceeding deals with the right of a School Board to retire a teacher on age. That such right exists is beyond question. The Act of June 20, 1939, P. … Superior Ct. 438, 442, 443 , 21 A. 2d 417, 419 ; Miller v. Stoudnour, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 567, 571, 572 , 26 A. 2d 113, 115 ; Cf. Smith v. Philadelphia School District, 334 Pa. 197, 205, 206 , 5 A. 2d 535, 539 .

Miller's Estate

345 Pa. 91 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1942

I am not going to mention the bank, but the boards undertook to try to save all local banks. We still thought prosperity was just around the corner, and all banks got together and lost their money, too. … thereafter carried in the account as though also appraised at $50. 4 Among them, Taylor’s Estate, 277 Pa. 518, 528 , 121 A. 310 ; Casani’s Estate, 342 Pa. 468, 471 , 21 A.2d 59 . 5 Casani’s Estate, 342 Pa. 468, 472, 21 A.2d 59 ; Brown

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stern

515 Pa. 68 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1987

This Court, in response to the Report and Recommendation filed in this matter by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (“Board”), has issued a Rule to Show Cause why Respondent, Peter M. … Thus, we are not bound by the findings of either the Hearing Committee or the Disciplinary Board. Matter of Green, 470 Pa. 164, 368 . A2d 245, (1977); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Barefoot Appeal

437 Pa. 323 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1970

See Schwartz v. Wagner, 385 Pa. 364 , 123 A. 2d 417 (1956). … L. 757, §1, 53 P.S. §48207(i), forecloses their right to now challenge the validity of that exception: Blank v. Board of Adjustment, 390 Pa. 636 , 136 A. 2d 695 (1957).

Sun Ship Employees Ass'n v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

351 Pa. 84 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1944

Board. … Lower Merion Township, 298 Pa. 471, 473 , 148 A. 846 ; Orime et al. v. Department of Public Instruction, 324 Pa. 371, 378 , 188 A. 337 ; Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company v.

Petrash Guardianship

425 Pa. 433 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1967

This board petitioned the Court of Common Pleas of Carbon County for the appointment of a guardian to prosecute Miss Petrash’s cause *435 of action against Steele so as to create a fund from which the board could reimburse … As late as 1948, this Court said in Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

Green Party of Pennsylvania v. Department of State Bureau of Commissions

168 A.3d 123 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2017

Citing to Carroll v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions and Retirement Municipal Pension Fund, 735 A.2d 141, 144 (Pa. … Firefighters’ Union, Local 22 v. City of Phila., 632 Pa. 243 , 119 A.3d 296 (2015).

O'Reilly v. Bard

105 Pa. 569 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1884

In Patterson v. … S., 334; the cases of Brinham v. Weliersburg Coal Co., supra, and Hoard v.

ODC v. Jeff Lee Lewin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2019

PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2617 Disciplinary Board No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 11 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217, and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Knorr v. Central Railroad

268 Pa. 172 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1920

...this board has no jurisdiction.” … R. v. Winfield, 244 U.

Commonwealth v. Crispell, D., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 2018

Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 691 (2004) (quoting Strickler v. … See Commonwealth v.