Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.17s
Ganassi v. Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C.
373 Pa. Super. 9 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1988
Wojciechowski v. Murray, 345 Pa.Super. 138 , 497 A.2d 1342 (1985). … See Kemper v. Fort, 219 Pa. 85, 88-90 , 67 A. 991, 992-93 (1907); B.B.C.I., Inc. v. Canada Dry Delaware Valley Bottling Co., 393 F.Supp. 299 (E.D.Pa. 1975).
Cited 11 timesPublishedZampogna v. Law Enforcement Health Benefits, Inc.
637 Pa. 576 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2016
Compare with Citizens’ Electric Illuminating Co. v. Lackawanna & W.V.R. … Cuker v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2021
MIDDLE DISTRICT IN RE RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD, : No. 120 MM 2021 : Petitioner : : : v … WOODLAND, PRESIDENT OF : PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL BOARD/SHANA : WALTER, COUNSEL FOR PENNSYLVANIA : MEDICAL BOARD, : : Respondents :
Cited 0 timesPublished356 Pa. 130 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1946
The court cited the case of Commonwealth ex rel. v. … See also Grime v. Dept. of Public Instruction, et al., 324 Pa. 371, 376 ; Hotel Casey Co. v. Ross et al., 343 Pa. 573 and 14 Corpus Juris Secundum, section 46, pp. 194 and 195.
Cited 9 timesPublishedGnagey v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance
332 Pa. 193 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1938
The board’s lack of jurisdiction over such cases cannot be remedied by an agreement between the parties: Thompson v. Parke, 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 81 . … The act contains numerous provisions dealing with the duties of the board, methods of proof, procedural rules, etc., which by their terms can apply only to cases coming within the jurisdiction of the board.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCrosson v. Downingtown Area School District
440 Pa. 468 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1970
Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Indiana County Board of Assessment and Revision of Taxes, 438 Pa. 506, 508 , 266 A. 2d 78 (1970). … In Narehood v.
Cited 28 timesPublished69 Pa. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1872
The case of Brown v. Dysinger, 1 Rawle 408 , in effect decides the question. … Justice Tod supposed in tbe last-mentioned case, from the' contract;” and so in Morey v. Herrick, 6 Harris 128, it was said 'the principle on which Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCounty of Fulton v. Sec. of Com., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2023
: Appellees : : : v … But I expect the Disciplinary Board to look at the record just as closely as we have, and I would specifically recommend the Board examine for their veracity some of the attestations Attorney Carroll made to this Court in
Cited 0 timesPublishedODC, Pet v. Lewis P. Hannah, III
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 2019
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2666 Disciplinary Board No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 53 DB 2019 : v … He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 2019
: No. 23 MM 2019 : Petitioner : : : v … : BROWN, ALT.), : : Respondents : ORDER PER CURIAM AND
Cited 0 timesPublishedSun Ship Employees Ass'n v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America
351 Pa. 84 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1944
Board. … Lower Merion Township, 298 Pa. 471, 473 , 148 A. 846 ; Orime et al. v. Department of Public Instruction, 324 Pa. 371, 378 , 188 A. 337 ; Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSoutheastern Greene Joint School District v. Dunkard Township School District
396 Pa. 209 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1959
Detweiler v. Hatfield Borough School District, 376 Pa. 555 . “What the Court said in Slippery Rock Area Joint School System v. … On this question, the action, of the individual board no longer has any specific impact on the individual district. It is an impact by the action of the joint board over all the member districts.
Cited 2 timesPublished111 Pa. 493 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1886
Browning brought suit against Parker, in t.he- Court of Common. … Denison v. Cornwell, 17 S. & R., 374 ; Comm’th v. Lockwood, 18 Pitts L. J., 10; Wills’ Appeal, 9 Pa. St., 103.
Cited 1 timesPublished8 Watts 12 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1839
Among others, it Avas especially the duty of the cashier, particularly in his own case, to give distinct informal tion to the board of directors, sitting as a board for the transaction of the business of the bank, that the … This point Avas made in Turnpike v. Judd, 3 Mass. Rep. 207 , where it was decided that a plaintiff may reply fraud to a plea of the statute of limitations, and avoid the plea.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAbel v. Northampton Traction Co.
212 Pa. 329 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1905
In Madara v. Electric Ry. Co., 192 Pa. 542 , Justice Dean said (p. 547) : “ If the accident had been apparently caused by the act of a stranger while the plaintiff was a passenger, as in Railway Co. v. … In Bumbear v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCarroll v. Ringgold Education Ass'n
545 Pa. 192 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1996
Relying on language in a footnote in our decision in Reichley by Wall v. … See, e.g., Commonwealth v.
Cited 9 timesPublished216 Pa. 452 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1907
Appellant was a member of the board of directors of the bank whose capital was impaired by bad loans. … Y. 15 ; Hun v. Salter, 92 N. Y. 651 ; Rector v. Teed, 120 N. Y. 588 ; Sickles v. Herold, 149 N. Y. 332 .
Cited 26 timesPublishedMaguire v. James Lees & Sons Co.
273 Pa. 85 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1922
In Lupfer v. … In Callihan v.
Cited 53 timesPublished392 Pa. 602 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1958
Because of errors apparent on the face of the returns, the county board of elections, sitting as the return board, opened and recounted the ballots in the boxes of 11 of the county’s 71 election districts. … See Kaufman Construction Company v.
Cited 12 timesPublished3 Serg. & Rawle 496 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1817
Browne, the plaintiff below, obtained a judgment against Liberty Browne, for 33 dollars 90 cents, before alderman Badger, on the 1st March, 1817. *497 The defendant entered an appeal on the 21st March. … I consider this point as settled by the judgment of this Court, in Sims v. Hampton, March Terna, 1815.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna