Case law

Genser v. Butler Brd. of Elec. Appeal of: RNC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2024

Accordingly, it concluded that Subsection (a.4)(5)(ii)(F) did not preclude the Board from counting their provisional ballots. Genser v. Butler Cnty. Bd. of Elections, 2024 WL 4051375 (Pa. Commw. … Democratic Party v.

Sabatine v. Commonwealth

497 Pa. 453 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1981

Calvert Distillers Corp. v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 376 Pa. 476, 479 , 103 A.2d 668, 669 (1954). … It is further settled that a party appealing from a denial of a tax refund by the Board of Finance has the burden of proof in a de novo proceeding before the Commonwealth Court. Anastasi Brothers Corp. v.

Taylor v. Moore

303 Pa. 469 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1931

An appeal was taken to the board of adjustment and that board also refused to issue the permit. Mandamus proceedings to compel the issuance of the permit Avere then instituted. … A. v. Beaver V. W. Co., 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 122 ; New Brighton Boro, v. New Brighton Water Co., 247 Pa. 232 ; St. Clair Boro, v. Tamaqua & Pottsville Elec. Ry. Co. et al., 259 Pa. 462 ; Scranton v. Scranton Ry.

Lewis v. Browning

111 Pa. 493 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1886

Browning brought suit against Parker, in t.he- Court of Common. … Denison v. Cornwell, 17 S. & R., 374 ; Comm’th v. Lockwood, 18 Pitts L. J., 10; Wills’ Appeal, 9 Pa. St., 103.

County of Berks v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 429

600 Pa. 128 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2009

of the prison guards was rationally derived from the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, it was entitled to deference under the “Essence Test” as reaffirmed by our Court most recently in Westmoreland Intermediate v. … See Office of the Attorney General v.

Commonwealth ex rel. O'Rourke v. Davis

199 Pa. 278 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1901

L. 779, authorized the court to appoint the board of controllers, and the Act of March 15, 1870, P. L. 437, designated it as “the board of public education of the first school district of Pennsylvania.” … In 1864, this court in Johnson v.

Twenty-Eighth Congressional District Nomination

268 Pa. 313 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1920

This, however, does not affect our right to issue a certiorari in order to determine, from an inspection of the record, whether or not the court below exceeded its jurisdiction: (Carpenter’s Case, 14 Pa. 486 ; Com. v. … Balph, 111 Pa. 365 ; Com. v. Smith, 185 Pa. 553 ), and for this purpose to examine the opinion of the court in order to discover the reasons for its action: Nomination Certificate of John S.

Walker v. Edmonds

197 Pa. 645 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1901

This is in accordance with the ruling in Gearhart v. Dixon, 1 Pa. 228 . In that case the school directors were required to levy the tax on or before the first Monday in May. … See also Com. v. Griest, 196 Pa. 416 , and cases therein cited.

Alco Parking Corp. v. Pittsburgh

453 Pa. 245 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1973

Rochester and Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Indiana County Board of Assessment, 138 Pa. 506 , 266 A. 2d 78 (1970). 2 The City of Pitts *253 burgli argues that the issues raised by appellants are not “substantia! … See Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers, supra, at 527 , 79 S. Ct. at 441 ; State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs of Indiana v. Jackson, 283 U.S. 527, 537 , 51 S. Ct. 540, 543 (1931); Brown-Forman Co. v.

Thomas v. Bache

351 Pa. 220 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1944

In Scheel v. Shaw, 60 Pa. … In Koch v.

Gerhart, S. v. DEP, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2023

Clean Air Council v. … Auth. v.

Com. Ex Rel. Houlahen v. Flynn

348 Pa. 101 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1943

Appellant was appointed on January 3, 1942, by the Allegheny County Board of Commissioners as a member of the Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review. … As Justice (now Chief Justice) Maxey stated in Commonwealth v.

City of Phila., Aplt. v. Tax Review Bd.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2015

Gas Works v. Commonwealth, 741 A.2d 841, 847 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1999) (“Neither the Board nor this [c]ourt has power to alter the explicit time limitation I in the [t]ax [c]ode based on equitable principles.” … Co. v.

Hough v. Amer. Red. Co. of Pitts.

315 Pa. 234 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1934

Appellant contends that the boy was contributorily negligent because he was riding on the running board, and that no negligence of defendant was shown. As to contributory negligence, the case is ruled by Hull v. … Bowers, 273 Pa. 429 ; Robinson v. American Ice Co., 292 Pa. 366 , and Sexauer v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 305 Pa. 319 . In Hull v.

Robinson v. Y.W.C.A.

433 Pa. 211 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1969

though taken in such further hearing.” (77 P.S. §§877, 879) In Driscoll v. … See: Miles v. Masters, 374 Pa. 127 , 97 A. 2d 36 (1953). 3 See: Robinson v. Y.W.C.A., 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 35 , 239 A. 2d 835 (1968).

Dallap v. Sharon City School District

524 Pa. 260 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1990

In Gibbons v. … In Duncan v.

Ballou v. State Ethics Commission

496 Pa. 127 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 1981

Lebanon v. County Board of Elections, 470 Pa. 317, 322 , 368 A.2d 648, 650 (1977). Accord, e.g., Lattanzio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 461 Pa. 392 , 336 A.2d 595 (1975). . … See, e. g., Knup v.

Richey v. Armour

293 Pa. 127 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1928

v. … Brown v. White, 202 Pa. 297 , much relied upon by appellant, is very different from the present case on its facts.

Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co. v. Scheckter

400 Pa. 405 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1960

A resolution by the board of directors will suffice. See Howell v. McCloskey, supra; Irving Trust Co. v. Deutsch, 73 F. 2d 121 (2nd Cir. 1934) ; Kimmell v. Geeting, 2 Grant 125 (1853). … Under the appellee’s own by-laws, 5 as well as the law of Maine, this would have required action by the directors acting as a board, and not singularly. Peirce v. Morse-Oliver Bldg.

McLean Coal Co. v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

328 Pa. 250 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1937

Shepard v. Barron, 194 U. S. 553 ; Bidwell v. City of Pittsburgh, 85 Pa. 412 ; Dewhurt v. City of Allegheny, 95 Pa. 437 ; Ferson’s Appeal, 96 Pa. 140 ; Clear Springs Water Co. v. … The affairs of an association such as the present district board are properly wound up and settled in equity: see Appeal of Christy, 92 Pa. 157 ; Ash v.