Case law

Butler v. School District

149 Pa. 351 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1892

Borough of Erie, 14 Pa. 211 ; Hickman v. Shimp, 109 Pa. 16 ; Stutz v. Coal Co., 131 Pa. 267 ; Benj. on Sales, § 595. This was the effect of the contract between the parties to this controversy. … But a still graver defect is that it was in no sense a notice from the board. A body of this kind must exercise its powers by joint action as a board: School District v. Fuess, 98 Pa. 600 ; Nason v.

ODC v. Jeffrey Allen Hulton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2379 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : No. 164 DB 2016 v. … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa. R.D. E. 208(g).

Cary v. Lower Merion School District

362 Pa. 310 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1949

Justice Horace Stern, This mandamus proceeding deals with the right of a School Board to retire a teacher on age. That such right exists is beyond question. The Act of June 20, 1939, P. … Superior Ct. 438, 442, 443 , 21 A. 2d 417, 419 ; Miller v. Stoudnour, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 567, 571, 572 , 26 A. 2d 113, 115 ; Cf. Smith v. Philadelphia School District, 334 Pa. 197, 205, 206 , 5 A. 2d 535, 539 .

Girsh Appeal

437 Pa. 237 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1970

See Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 425 Pa. 43 , 228 A. 2d 169 (1967); Ammon R. Smith Auto Co. Appeal, 423 Pa. 493 , 223 A. 2d 683 (1966); Norate Corp. v. … Eves v. Zoning Board of Adjust ment, 401 Pa. 211 , 164 A. 2d 7 (1960).

Browne, P., Aplt. v. Senate of Pa.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 2024

BROWNE, SECRETARY, : No. 83 MAP 2024 PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : REVENUE, : : … : Appellant : : : v

Murdock v. New York News Bureau

263 Pa. 502 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1919

The referee’s findings were confirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the decision of the board was, in turn, sustained by the court below. … , as well as of the court below, to determine whether or not the decision is founded upon a proper basis: McCauley v.

Herskovits Et Ux. v. Irwin

299 Pa. 155 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1930

Building Corp. v. New York, 195 N. Y. Supp. 68 -9. Hence, the permit of June 26th was improperly cancelled and the board of adjustment correctly ordered its reinstatement. … See also Fuller v. Schwab, 208 N. Y. Supp. 289, 290; State v. Wisconsin Tel. Co., 181 Wis. 519 , 195 N. W. 544 .

Commonwealth v. McDermott

224 Pa. 362 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1908

Justice Brown, These appeals were manifestly taken for the purpose of re-arguing the question of the constitutionality of the Act of May 29,1901, P. … In Commonwealth v. Caulfield, 211 Pa. 644 , we said there was no reason “why we should stuff the reports” with a repetition of the decisions sustaining it.

Taylor v. Moore

303 Pa. 469 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1931

An appeal was taken to the board of adjustment and that board also refused to issue the permit. Mandamus proceedings to compel the issuance of the permit Avere then instituted. … A. v. Beaver V. W. Co., 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 122 ; New Brighton Boro, v. New Brighton Water Co., 247 Pa. 232 ; St. Clair Boro, v. Tamaqua & Pottsville Elec. Ry. Co. et al., 259 Pa. 462 ; Scranton v. Scranton Ry.

Alekseev v. CITY COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA

607 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2010

See Alekseev v. City Council of Phila., 976 A.2d 1253, 1256 (Pa. Cmwlth.2009) (“Unlike the Act’s definition of ‘meeting,’ the definition of ‘special meeting’ does not require the presence of a quorum of Council. … Servs., Inc. v. Dauphin County Gen. Auth., 593 Pa. 184, 192 , 928 A.2d 1013, 1017-18 (2007) (recognizing that the Legislature sets public policy to be enforced by the courts in the absence of constitutional infirmity).

Gerhart, S. v. DEP, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2023

Clean Air Council v. … Auth. v.

Valente v. Lindner

340 Pa. 508 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 1940

In Schomaker v. … But that case, and those following it (Whitman v. Stipp, 270 Pa. 401 ; Toner v. Penna. R. R. Co., 263 Pa. 438 ; Fairman v. Dorney, 73 Pa.

Carney v. Lowe

336 Pa. 289 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1939

Graham v. Schmid, 333 Pa. 568 , and it would be but repetitious to enter upon an analysis of the conclusion there reached and its supporting reasons. … The decree of the court below is affirmed, the parties to bear their respective costs. 1 See Wood v. Philadelphia, 46 Pa.

Clifton Heights Appeal

440 Pa. 101 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1970

O’Neill *104 v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 434 Pa. 331 , 254 A. 2d 12 (1969); Cleaver v. Board of Adjust., 414 Pa. 367 , 200 A. 2d 408 (1964); Di Santo v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 410 Pa. 331 , 189 A. 2d 135 (1963). … Cooper v. Board of Adjust., 412 Pa. 429 , 195 A. 2d 101 (1963); Andress v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 410 Pa. 77 , 188 A. 2d 709 (1963); Magrann v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 404 Pa. 198 , 170 A. 2d 553 (1961).

Thomas v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

280 Pa. 331 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1924

Had the referee and board so found, and granted compensation, the judgment might be sustained (Watkins v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 278 Pa. 463 ; Hornetz v. P. & R. C. & I. Co., 277 Pa. 40 ; Wolford v. Geisel M. & S. … Carnegie Co., 263 Pa. 113 ; Kuca v.

Commonwealth, Office of Administration v. Orage

511 Pa. 528 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1986

As stated in Sterling v. … See also Commonwealth, Department of State v.

Market East Assoc. v. PA Gaming Control Bd.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2017

Petitioner : Appeal from the Supplemental : Adjudication of the Pennsylvania : Gaming Control Board in the matter of v … Notably, the Board adopted this definition nearly verbatim in its regulation relevant to the Board's operations and organization. 58 Pa. Code § 403a.1.

City of Phila. v. Tax Review Bd., Aplts.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2015

Gas Works v. Commonwealth, 741 A.2d 841, 847 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1999) (“Neither the Board nor this [c]ourt has power to alter the explicit time limitation I in the [t]ax [c]ode based on equitable principles.” … Co. v.

In Re: Private Comp. Filed by L. Ajaj Apl of Com.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2023

Commonwealth v. … In Commonwealth v.

Kopeika v. MEDICAL SERVICES ASS'N.

347 Pa. Super. 500 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1985

Albert v. Alter, 252 Pa.Superior Ct. 203, 381 A.2d 459 (1977). Dr. … Kaminski Brothers, Inc. v. Lussi, 308 Pa.Superior Ct. 250, 454 A.2d 115 (1982).