Case law

Stone v. American Lacquer Solvents Co.

463 Pa. 417 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1975

Twelfth Street Market Co. v. Jackson, 102 Pa. 269 (1883). … Library Hall Co. v. Pittsburg Assn., 173 Pa. 30 , 33 A. 744 (1896); Pike County v. Rowland, 94 Pa. 238 (1880). See also W.

Montgomery County Bar Ass'n v. Rinalducci

329 Pa. 296 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1938

The mechanism for disbarment under this Rule is discussed in Rosenbaum’s Case, 300 Pa. 465; Klensin v. Board of Governance, 312 Pa. 564 , and Alexander’s Case, 321 Pa. 125 . … different functions of the Board and the Court itself: “Respondent has misapprehended the functions of the Board.

Shoup v. Shoup

469 Pa. 165 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1976

Royal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Tunnelton Mining Co., 444 Pa. 105 , 282 A.2d 384 (1971); Portnoy v. Brown, 430 Pa. 401 , 243 A.2d 444 (1968); Brown v. Hahn, 419 Pa. 42 , 213 A.2d 342 (1965). See also Keil v. … See Royal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Tunnelton Mining Co., supra; Portnoy v. Brown, supra. *173 The decree is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Clean Air Council, Aplts v. DEP and Sunoco

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2023

Clean Air Council v. … Auth. v.

McKelvy's Appeal

72 Pa. 409 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1873

This is ruled in Brown v. … On this part of the case the quotation of the language of Judge Sergeant, in Brown v. Agnew, supra, may be continued.

Boyd's Executors v. Browne

6 Pa. 310 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 1847

These doctrines are fully established by the eases of Haly v. Free, 3 Term Rep. 51; Foster v. Charles, 6 Bing. 369; same case, 7 Bing. 105; Corbit v. Brown, 8 Bing. 33; Allen v. Addington, 7 Wend. 9 . In Foster v. … The soundness of this opinion is fully shown by the authorities, and particularly by Corbit v. Brown, 8 Bing. 33; Allen v. Addington, 7 Wend. 9 , and Ward v. Centre, 3 Johns. Rep. 271.

Rekas v. Dopkavich

362 Pa. 292 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1949

Ladew, 171 Pa. 369, 376 , 33 A. 329 ; Gilbert v. Price, 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 359, 361 . … Central Trust & Savings Co., 285 Pa. 472, 476 , 132 A. 579 ; MeConville v. Ingham, 268 Pa. 507, 519 , 112 A. 85 ; Beale v. KUne, 183 Pa. 149, 154 , 38 A. 897 ; and Stoehett v.

Acchione and Canuso v. COM., DEPT. OF TR.

501 Pa. 337 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1983

On appeal to the Commonwealth Court, the Court reversed the award of the board, holding that the board misapplied the rule of Pa. Turnpike Commission v. … Pennsylvania Dept, of Trans, v.

Womer's Case

337 Pa. 349 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1940

If the Board desired at the outset to give her merely a provisional position, to meet a temporary emergency, it would have said so in its resolution and contract: Com. ex rel. v. Sunbury School District, 335 Pa. 6 . … In so deciding, we do not interfere with the School Board’s discretion in the assignment of its teachers, nor are we commanding the Board to apply for an emergency teacher-librarian certificate for appellee.

Ulansey v. Juniata Park Medical Center, Inc.

406 Pa. 389 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1962

In Engemann v. … McCreery, 307 Pa. 62 , 160 A. 722 ; 31 C.J.S., §216, page 948; Henry on Evidence, 4th Ed., §475; Marino v. Vecchio, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 377 ; Wonsetler v. Wonsetler, 23 Pa.

In Re: Private Comp. Filed by L. Ajaj Apl of Com.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2023

Commonwealth v. … In Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Protection v. Cromwell Township

613 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2011

Beghian v. … Dunson v.

Bowfin KeyCon Hldgs. v. DEP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2026

2023 SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : Appeal from the Order of the INTERIM ACTING CHAIRPERSON OF : Commonwealth Court at No. 41 MD THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD … Commonwealth Court at No. 41 MD THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD : 2022 dated June 28, 2022 : : SUBMITTED: May 13, 2025 v

Klopp v. Witmoyer

43 Pa. 219 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 1861

In Rowley v. … In State v.

Jackson v. Hendrick

509 Pa. 456 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1986

Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d 1115, 1145 (5th Cir.1982), quoting Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 16 , 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1276 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); see Union *466 County Jail Inmates v. … Filanowski v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 439 Pa. 360 , 266 A.2d 670 (1970); Kuchinic v. McCrory, 422 Pa. 620, 222 A.2d 897 (1966); Brown Estate, 408 Pa. 214 , 183 A.2d 307 (1962). .

Elkins Park Improvement Ass'n Zoning Case

361 Pa. 322 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1949

Appellant does not complain of the grant by the Board of a special exception enabling the erection of multiple dwellings. … See also Ventresca v. Exley, 358 Pa. 98, 100 , 56 A. 2d 210 . The circumstances motivating the grant of this variance were most peculiar and exceptional.

Mosaica Academy Charter School v. Commonwealth, Department of Education

813 A.2d 813 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2002

Pappas v. Asbel, 555 Pa. 342 , 724 A.2d 889 (1998). … In Kelmo Enterprises Inc. v.

DEP Aplt v. PA Legislative Reference Bureau

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2026

2023 SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : Appeal from the Order of the INTERIM ACTING CHAIRPERSON OF : Commonwealth Court at No. 41 MD THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD … Commonwealth Court at No. 41 MD THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD : 2022 dated June 28, 2022 : : SUBMITTED: May 13, 2025 v

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Walker

469 Pa. 432 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1976

We are not bound by the findings of either the Hearing Committee or the Disciplinary Board. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell, 463 Pa. 472, 479 , 345 A.2d 616, 620 (1975). … See also McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 465 Pa. 104 , 348 A.2d 376, 380 (1975); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Gilfillan's Permit

291 Pa. 358 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1927

On appeal from the board’s decision to the court of common pleas, the order of the board was reversed, after hearing testimony, and the board directed to issue a permit for the construction of the building. … The subject is considered by this court in Ward’s App., 289 Pa. 458 , and Liggett’s App., 271 Pa. 109 , and by the Supreme Court of the United States in Euclid Avenue v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.