Case law

Commonwealth v. Commonwealth

521 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1989

E.g., Independent State Store Union v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 495 Pa. 145 , 432 A.2d 1375 (1981); see Pierro v. Pierro, 434 Pa. 131 , 252 A.2d 652 (1969); Louden Hill Farm, Inc. v. … E.g., Wiley House v. Scanlon, 502 Pa. 228 , 465 A.2d 995 (1983); Norfolk and Western Ry. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 489 Pa. 109 , 413 A.2d 1037 (1980); Willowbrook Mining Co. v.

Costigan v. Philadelphia Finance Department Employees Local 696

462 Pa. 425 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 1975

We have previously addressed the question of who is the employer of particular public employees in Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 457 Pa. 456 , 322 A.2d 362 (1974). … E. g., Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Overbrook Golf Club, 385 Pa. 358 , 123 A.2d 698 (1956); Locust Club v. Hotel and Club Employees’ Union, 397 Pa. 357 , 155 A.2d 27 (1959).

In re Melograne

585 Pa. 357 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 2005

In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Lord Appeal

368 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1951

Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 , 43 S. Ct. 158 ; St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. St. Louis, 249 U.S. 269 , 39 S. Ct. 274 ; Eubank v. Richmond, 226 U.S. 137 , 33 S. Ct. 76 . … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 367 Pa. 608 , 80 A. 2d 765 ; Kline v. Harrisburg, 362 Pa. 438, 451 , 68 A. 2d 182 . In the light of these principles we shall first examine the ordinance and the pertinent facts.

In Re: Recount of Ballots

457 Pa. 279 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1974

This point was made clear in Turtzo v. … X) or check (V) mark thereon is irregular in form.

Commonwealth v. Carey

368 Pa. 157 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1951

In Commonwealth v. … We have, in Pennsylvania, a State Parole Board, which has jurisdiction in all cases except where the penalty is death or life imprisonment, and we also have a Pardon Board, and the Pardon Board is comprised of the Lieutenant

Trude v. Martin

672 A.2d 279 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1996

Mosaica Academy Charter School v. Commonwealth

572 Pa. 191 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2002

Pappas v. Asbel, 555 Pa. 342 , 724 A.2d 889 (1998). … In Kelmo Enterprises Inc. v.

Chartiers Township Appeal

414 Pa. 176 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1964

the board, although the board was not so required by statute, to make a recommendation to the court and the board unanimously recommended that the annexation petition be denied and the annexation proceedings dismissed. … Hinnershitz v. United Traction Co., 206 Pa. 91 , 55 A. 841 .

Pennsylvania State Police v. Cantina Gloria's Lounge, Inc.

536 Pa. 254 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1994

from those found by the Board. … Adair v. Liquor Control Board, 519 Pa. 103 , 546 A.2d 19 (1988). On June 29, 1987, the entire Liquor Code was re-enacted with substantial amendments and which became effective on July 1, 1987.

Dunkard Township School Tax Case

359 Pa. 605 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1948

Meanwhile, but with its provisions unknown to the Board of School Directors, the Act of July 5,1947, P. … Not only is double taxation constitutionally permissible (see Puntureri v. School District of Pittsburgh, 359 Pa. 596 , 60 A. 2d 42 ), but here *610 there is no double taxation.

Schade v. Allegheny County Institution District

386 Pa. 507 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1956

[See Cochran v. Board of Education, 281 U.S. 370, 374-375 ].... … Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303 ; Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 108 ; Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15 ; and McCollum v.

Petrosky v. ZON. BD., UPPER CHICHESTER TP.

485 Pa. 501 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1979

On appeal to the Commonwealth Court the order of the Court of Common Pleas was reversed and the order of the Zoning Board was reinstated. Zoning Hearing Board, Township of Upper Chichester v. … Support for such a doctrine is found by him in cases such as Heidorn Appeal, 412 Pa. 570 , 195 A.2d *507 349 (1963); Sheedy v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 409 Pa. 655 , 187 A.2d 907 (1963); Moyerman v.

Commonwealth v. Tinson

433 Pa. 328 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1969

Although at least a limited right of appeal attacking an abuse of the board’s discretion would seem allowable, see Commonwealth ex rel. Jones v. Rundle, 33 Pa. D. *332 & C. 2d 9 (C.P. … Mempa v. Rhay, supra at 135 , 88 S.

In the Matter of: James R. Cooney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 2016

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF DlSClPL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2234 Disciplinary Board No. 3 Petitioner No. 141 DB 2016 n Attorney Registration No. 32706 V- (Allegheny County) JAl\/|ES R. … quarterly written reports with copies to Disciplinary Counsel; and, e. immediately report to the Secretary of the Board any violations by Respondent of the terms and conditions of the probation.

Quigley, C. v. UCBR, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021

of Review (Board). … Steel Corp. v. UCBR, 858 A.2d 91, 99 (Pa. 2004) (emphasis added), citing 2 Pa.C.S. §704; see also, e.g., Diehl v.

Daly v. Darby Township School District

434 Pa. 286 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1969

See, e.g., Bechler v. Oliva, 400 Pa. 299 , 161 A. 2d 156 (1960); Brenner v. Sukenik, 410 Pa. 324 , 189 A. 2d 246 (1963). … Since the issue of lack of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time by the parties or sua sponte by this Court, see, e.g., Roberts v. Martorano, 427 Pa. 581 , 235 A. 2d 602 (1967); Barco v.

Biddle v. Hooven

120 Pa. 221 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1888

The defendants refer us to Korn v. Browne, 64 Pa. 55 , as decisive upon this point. We cannot give that case the full effect claimed for it. … But this is .a presumption of fact and liable to be rebutted; not a legal presumption, as was erroneously stated in Korn v. Browne, supra.

Fitzmaurice v. Fabian

147 Pa. 199 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1892

Chief Justice Paxson, This case is ruled by Curtin v. … The landlord, unless under a covenant to repair, was not bound to replace the boards.

Absentee Ballots Case

431 Pa. 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 1968

In considering a constitutional question we are guided by the principle clearly enunciated in Daly v. … Com. v. Clark, 7 W. & S. 127.