Case law

Commonwealth v. Blouse

531 Pa. 167 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1992

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); United States v. *170 Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 , 96 S.Ct. 3074 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 ; Commonwealth v. Swanger, 453 Pa. 107 , 307 A.2d 875 (1973). … Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. at 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. at 2640 , 61 L.Ed.2d at 362 . In Commonwealth v.

Olmsted's Case

292 Pa. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1928

to modify it, and, as long as the rule stands unchanged, the board......must observe it; the action of the board in declining to accept the papers of the applicant, without such formal declarations in writing [as required … L. 131, was an unconstitutional interference with a judicial prerogative; in Hoopes v.

Commonwealth v. Davis, C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 26, 2019

111 EM 2019 : Respondent : : : v … Brown, Esquire, is DIRECTED to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.

Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port Authority

417 Pa. 299 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1965

National Transit Co. v. Boardman, 328 Pa. 450 , 197 Atl. 239 (1938); Kuzmen v. Kamien, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 538 , 12 A. 2d 471 (1940). … Tranter v.

In the Matter of: James R. Cooney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 2016

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF DlSClPL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2234 Disciplinary Board No. 3 Petitioner No. 141 DB 2016 n Attorney Registration No. 32706 V- (Allegheny County) JAl\/|ES R. … quarterly written reports with copies to Disciplinary Counsel; and, e. immediately report to the Secretary of the Board any violations by Respondent of the terms and conditions of the probation.

Ward v. Taylor

1 Pa. 238 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1845

Shearick v. Huber, 6 Bin. 2; 2 Brown, 160. … Brown, 13 Maine Rep. 236 ; Rowland and Rowland, 8 Ohio Rep.; Anderson v. Newsmith, 7 N. H. 167.

Watson Appeal

377 Pa. 495 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1954

case of a dismissal is conclusive, unless, the board can be shown to have acted corruptly or in. bad. faith, or - to have clearly abuséd its powers” McCrea v. … In Imhoff v.

Ephrata Area School District v. County of Lancaster

595 Pa. 111 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2007

Dist. v. County of Lancaster, 886 A.2d 1169 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005). … E.g., McGrory v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 591 Pa. 56 , 915 A.2d 1155, 1158 (2007); MCI WorldCom, Inc. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm’n, 577 Pa. 294 , 844 A.2d 1239 , 1245 n. 3 (2004); Mosaica Acad. Charter Sch. v.

Kraus v. Philadelphia

337 Pa. 30 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1939

The appointing bodies are there endowed with the untrammeled right to . dismiss at will, without the need of specifying any reason for the action: Com. ex rel. v. Hiltner, 307 Pa. 343 ; Com. ex rel. Schofield v. … Braughler v. Weir, 165 Pa. 284 ; see Com. ex rel. Kelley v. Clark, 327 Pa. 181, 187, 188 . Judgment affirmed; appellant to pay costs.

Donaldson v. Ritenour

354 Pa. Super. 568 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1986

See: Kleinberger v. Tax Claim Bur. of Lehigh County, 64 Pa.Commw.Ct. 30 , 438 A.2d 1045 (1982); In re Upset Sale, Tax Claim Bur. of Bucks County, 48 Pa.Commw.Ct. 435 , 410 A.2d 376 (1980); Brown v. … Barnes Real Estate Co., 44 Pa.Commw.Ct. 439 , 404 A.2d 437 (1979); Povlow v. Brown, 12 Pa.Commw.Ct. 303 , 315 A.2d 375 (1974).

ODC v. James John Walsh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 2017

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2259 Disciplinary DoCket No. 3 Petitioner No. 6 DB 2017 v. … quarterly written reports; and immediately report to the Secretary of the Board any violations by the Respondent of the terms and conditions of the probation.

Absentee Ballots Case

431 Pa. 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 1968

In considering a constitutional question we are guided by the principle clearly enunciated in Daly v. … Com. v. Clark, 7 W. & S. 127.

Fitzmaurice v. Fabian

147 Pa. 199 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1892

Chief Justice Paxson, This case is ruled by Curtin v. … The landlord, unless under a covenant to repair, was not bound to replace the boards.

Crouse, Inc. v. Braddock Borough School District

341 Pa. 497 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1941

on the part of the Board.” … The question before us is ruled by our decision in Chilli v. McKeesport School District, 334 Pa. 581 , 6 A. 2d 99 .

Glenn v. Kittanning Brewing Co.

259 Pa. 510 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1918

Plaintiff Glenn and Luker, two of the board of directors, represented one faction and the defendants Reese, Stage and Jessop, the remaining members and the majority of the board, the other. … Smith Construction Co., 242 Pa. 269 ; Hechelman v. Geyer, 248 Pa. 430 .

Carroll v. Ringgold Education Ass'n

545 Pa. 192 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1996

Relying on language in a footnote in our decision in Reichley by Wall v. … See, e.g., Commonwealth v.

Seiss v. McClintic-marshall Corp.

324 Pa. 201 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1936

, the board itself had notice of the making of the agreement and impliedly ratified it. … There is very little here to show that the board had knowledge of the agreement. See also on the subject of necessary knowledge before ratification can be assumed: Pollock v.

Middleton's Executors v. Middleton

106 Pa. 252 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1884

It is claimed by the plaintiffs, on the authority of Fetter-man v. Murphy, 4 Watts, 424 , Brobst v. Bright, 8 Id., 124, Wells v. Baird, 3 Barr., 351, Konigmaker v. Brown, 2 Harris, 269, Baxter v. Allen, 27 P. F. … years had elapsed since the entry of the original judgment, as between the judgment creditor and his debtor, the judgment was a valid, subsisting lien on the land at the date of the defendant’s death in December, 1878: Brown

Fiore v. Commonwealth

547 Pa. 357 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1997

In re: Richard A. v. Zerbe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2021

MIDDLE DISTRICT IN RE RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD, : No. 120 MM 2021 : Petitioner : : : v … WOODLAND, PRESIDENT OF : PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL BOARD/SHANA : WALTER, COUNSEL FOR PENNSYLVANIA : MEDICAL BOARD, : : Respondents :