Case law

Com. v. Brown

928 A.2d 1288 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 2007

928 A.2d 1288 (2007) COM. v. BROWN. No. 284 MAL (2007). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. July 30, 2007. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Commonwealth v. Brown

496 Pa. 86 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1981

Commonwealth v. Brown, 478 Pa. 628 , 387 A.2d 665 (1978). … Commonwealth v. Sanabria, 478 Pa. 22 , 385 A.2d 1292 (1978); Commonwealth v. Baranyai, 278 Pa. Super. 83 , 419 A.2d 1368 (1980).

Scott v. Brown

240 Pa. 328 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1913

In Kase v. … tbe official duty of a notary and when duly certified and not contradicted or questioned, the presumption that always arises in favor of official acts requires us to bold that it was given according to law, and in Starr v.

Springer v. Brown

9 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1848

Such is the principle of Allison v. Rankin, 7 S. & R. 269, in which an error in entering judgment on a mortgage, after a single nihil, was not allowed to destroy the sheriff’s deed, and such the principle of Speer v. … Even where an opposite presumption has arisen from the lapse of a year and a day, it appears from Patrick v. Johnson, 3 Lev. 404, and Howard v.

Transue v. Brown

31 Pa. 92 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1857

These circumstances raise a presumption that the name signed to the instrument was the alleged testator’s own handwriting: Barker v. McFerran, 2 Casey 211.

Ruzyc v. Brown

327 Pa. 61 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1937

The controversy came to this court once before: Ruzyc v. Brown, 320 Pa. 213 . … The action was properly brought in the name of the grantors to the use of the mortgagee: Britton v. Roth, 313 Pa. 352, 356 ; Frey v. United Traction Co. of Pittsburgh, 320 Pa. 196, 199 .

Brown v. Adams

2 Whart. 188 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1837

And in Sutton and Wife v. … In Moore v. Black, (Talb.

Commonwealth v. Brown

492 Pa. 320 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1981

In Commonwealth v. … The Commonwealth cites Commonwealth v.

Brown v. Power

263 Pa. 287 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1919

Sloan v. Brown

228 Pa. 495 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1910

And in strict consistency with the principle thus declared, in the subsequent case of Westinghouse v. German Nat. … Brown individually, rather than to the firm of Morris Brown & Company. No suggestion is made by counsel for appellee that a decree against James E. Brown for the return of the stock cannot be enforced.

Brown v. Orr

112 Pa. 233 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 1886

heirs and assigns, upon the death of said Caleb Brown, to $1,000.”' … This is familiar law: McAleer v. McMurray, 58 Penn. St. Rep., 126 ; Craig v. Gregg, 83 Id., 19. Judgment affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Brown

482 Pa. 256 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1978

Com. v. Brown

983 A.2d 725 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 2009

983 A.2d 725 (2009) COM. v. BROWN. No. 56 WAL (2009). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. August 26, 2009. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.

Com. v. Brown

588 Pa. 755 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 2006

903 A.2d 536 (2006) COM. v. BROWN. No. 211 WAL (2006) Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. July 13, 2006. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeals denied.

Brown v. Herman

547 Pa. 352 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1997

Commonwealth v. Brown

434 Pa. 356 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1969

Opinion Per Curiam, In June 1960, the appellant, William Brown, was convicted by a jury in Philadelphia County of assault with intent to rob and aggravated assault and battery. … See Commonwealth v. Wilson, 430 Pa. 1 , 241 A. 2d 760 (1968), and Commonwealth v. Mumford, 430 Pa. 451 , 243 A. 2d 440 (1968). It is so ordered.

Brown v. Commonwealth

602 Pa. 206 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 2009

See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453, 462 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record. See MC-51-CR-0052025-2007.

Craig v. Brown

48 Pa. 202 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1864

In Shank v.

Brown v. Rosenthal

378 Pa. 77 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1954

Rosenthal’s actual holdings [of Jones & Brown, Inc.] are 502 shares Chas. Brown & Family ” ” ” ” 498 ” 1000 ” ” These agreements were signed by both Rosenthal and Brown. … fact by a chancellor who saw and heard the witnesses, especially when approved by the court in banc, will not be reversed by an appellate court if there is adequate evidence to sustain them: [Citing authorities]”: Barrett v.

Brown v. Powell

25 Pa. 229 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1855

A tenant for years is an owner within the meaning of the Act, and is entitled to compensation according to his interest: Turnpike Road v. Brosi, 10 Harris 29.