Case law

Sheaffer v. Brown

281 Pa. 114 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 1924

Brown being incompetent owing to the death of Sheaffer, and she being “a party to the thing or contract in action,” for the same reason her husband was disqualified: Bittner v. Boone, 128 Pa. 567 ; Myers v.

Com. v. Brown

960 A.2d 454 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 2008

960 A.2d 454 (2008) COM. v. BROWN. No. 372 EAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. October 29, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Com. v. Brown

964 A.2d 893 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2009

964 A.2d 893 (2009) COM. v. BROWN. [1] No. 809 MAL (2006). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. January 22, 2009. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Hugg v. Brown

6 Whart. 468 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1841

See Good v. Good, ( 5 Watts, 117 .) … Murray v. Williamson, ( 3 Binn. 135 .) Wolf v. Beales, (6 S. & R. 244.)

Boschert v. Brown

72 Pa. 372 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1872

It will he sufficient to refer to the case of The Manufacturers’ and Mechanics’ Bank v. … That Brown and Taggart were sureties on the contract in question, not guarantors, is ruled in effect in Reigart v. White, 2 P. F.

Landon v. Brown

160 Pa. 538 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1894

Commonwealth v. Brown

600 Pa. 93 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2008

Brown v. Beard

956 A.2d 436 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 2008

956 A.2d 436 (2008) BROWN v. BEARD. No. 242 WAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. August 14, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Com. v. Brown

961 A.2d 858 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2008

961 A.2d 858 (2008) COM. v. BROWN. No. 507 MAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. November 14, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Reedy v. Brown

395 Pa. 382 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1959

395 Pa. 382 (1959) Reedy, Appellant, v. Brown. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 20, 1959. April 20, 1959. *383 Before JONES, C.J., BELL, MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, BOK and McBRIDE, JJ. George J.

Hollis v. Brown

159 Pa. 539 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1894

Brown v. Martin

946 A.2d 683 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 2008

946 A.2d 683 (2008) BROWN v. MARTIN. No. 419 WAL (2007). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. April 14, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Com. v. Brown

948 A.2d 802 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2008

948 A.2d 802 (2008) COM. v. BROWN. No. 622 EAL (2007). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. April 28, 2008. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Brown v. Kelley

938 A.2d 1051 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 2007

938 A.2d 1051 (2007) BROWN v. KELLEY. In re Kelly. No. 356 EAL (2007). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. December 10, 2007. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.

Haly v. Brown

5 Pa. 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1847

Wightman, 7 Watts & Serg. 264 ; Jones v. Wardell, 6 Watts & Serg. 401 ; Brittain v. The Doylestown Bank, 5 Watts & Serg. 98 ; Spencer v. Bank of Salina, 3 Hill, 521 . … Brown, which devolved on Brown, in a reasonable time to send the notice of the dishonour of the note to the defendant.

Com. v. Brown

932 A.2d 74 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 2007

932 A.2d 74 (2007) COM. v. BROWN. No. 239 EAL (2007). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. September 11, 2007. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal. Denied.

Com. v. Brown

921 A.2d 494 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2007

921 A.2d 494 (2007) COM. v. BROWN [2] . No. 590 EAL (2006). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. April 13, 2007. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.

Commonwealth v. Brown

496 Pa. 86 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1981

Commonwealth v. Brown, 478 Pa. 628 , 387 A.2d 665 (1978). … Commonwealth v. Sanabria, 478 Pa. 22 , 385 A.2d 1292 (1978); Commonwealth v. Baranyai, 278 Pa. Super. 83 , 419 A.2d 1368 (1980).

Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA

585 Pa. 44 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2005

The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration of whether a duty exists by applying the five-prong test as set forth in Althaus v.

Springer v. Brown

9 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1848

Such is the principle of Allison v. Rankin, 7 S. & R. 269, in which an error in entering judgment on a mortgage, after a single nihil, was not allowed to destroy the sheriff’s deed, and such the principle of Speer v. … Even where an opposite presumption has arisen from the lapse of a year and a day, it appears from Patrick v. Johnson, 3 Lev. 404, and Howard v.