Case law

Brown v. Simpson

2 Watts 233 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1834

By the act of assembly of 1798, and the construction put on it by this court in the cases of Black v. Dobson, 11 Serg. & Rawle 94 , and Bombay v. … In Irvine v.

Brown v. Moss

631 Pa. 488 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 2015

Stephenson v. Brown

147 Pa. 300 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1892

You will have to say if there was anything in the conduct of Bernard, or Brown, under him, that showed it to be willful after objection. If so, plaintiff would be entitled to damages.” … Stephenson did say, when recalled in rebuttal: “ I asked Brown to take some bags out of the alley so that Deould get out. He said he would do so in five minutes; did not for three quarters of an hour.”

Foley v. Brown

407 Pa. 29 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1962

Commonwealth v. Brown

222 Pa. Super. 714 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1972

Brown v. Commonwealth

631 Pa. 447 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 2015

Erb v. Brown

69 Pa. 216 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1871

It could not be extinguished or renounced by a parol agreement between the owners of the dominant and the servient tenement: Dyer v. … . *219 Nor would it become extinguished by disuse, or lost by nonuser : Curtis v. Keesler, 14 Barb. 511 ; Smiles v.

Brown v. Finnegan

389 Pa. 609 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1957

Hess v. Brown

111 Pa. 124 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1886

She may trade with it, purchase other goods with its proceeds, and-hold all against the husband’s creditors: Wieman v. Anderson, 42 Pa. … As we said in Lienbach v.

Brown v. Street

6 Watts & Serg. 221 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1843

Knight v. Pugh, *223 ( 4 Watts & Serg. 445 ).

Commonwealth v. Brown

169 A.3d 34 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2017

Commonwealth v. Brown

437 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1970

Commonwealth v. Wright, 411 Pa. 81 , 190 A. 2d 709 (1963); Common *5 wealth v. Anderson, 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 323 , 222 A. 2d 495 (1966); United States v. Reckis, 119 F. Supp. 687 (D. Mass. 1954). … It asserts that the situation is governed by the decisions in Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206 (1966); Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293 (1966); Lopez v. United States, 373 U.S. 427 (1963); and United States v.

Brown v. Boyd

9 Watts & Serg. 123 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1845

The same principle has been adopted and followed in other cases, vide Willowes v. Lidcot, (2 Vent. 285, 286); S. C., (Carth. 50); 3 Mod. 229; Litton v. Faulkland, (2 Vern. 621). So in Cooke v. … And in Harper v.

Brown v. Philadelphia

267 Pa. 183 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1920

Per Curiam, December 28, 1916, about 3:45 p. m., Lottie Brown was going along the east sidewalk of South Forty-seventh street, Philadelphia; when in front of No. 1429, she stepped into a pool of water three quarters of a

Brown v. Campbell

1 Watts 41 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1832

courts are to determine what were the existing laws, in the sense supposed, at the passing of the act; and it has already been decided, in a case not yet reported, that whatever may have been the interpretation put on Young v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

574 Pa. 231 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 2003

. *233 In capital, post-conviction appeals, this Court has recently emphasized the necessity of both an adequate written opinion of the PCRA court, see Commonwealth v. … 207, 224-25 , 732 A.2d 1167, 1176 (1999); see also id. at 254-55 , 732 A.2d at 1192-93 (Castille, J.), and appropriate and sufficient pre-dismissal notice where a post-conviction petition is dismissed, see Commonwealth v.

Shontz v. Brown

27 Pa. 123 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1856

Snyder, 18 Ser. & R. 160; Bank v. Galbraith, 10 Barr 490. … In Shurtz v.

Brown v. Johnson

4 Rawle 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1833

Thus in M'Call v. … But in Bantleon v.

Brown v. Hill

280 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1924

Encyc. of Law, 2d ed., 10, 22; Case v. Green, 5 Watts 262 ; Allshouse v. Ramsay, 6 Wharton 331 ; Schaeffer v. Coldren, 237 Pa. 77 ; Loughney v. Quigley, supra. … J. 667; Allshouse v. Ramsay, supra; Roberts v. Beatty, 2 P. & W. 63, 71; Emlen v. Lehigh Coal and Navigation Co., 47 Pa. 76, 83 ; 28 Am. & *4 Eng. Encyc. of Law, 2d ed., 23; Hale v. Patton, 60 N. Y.

Brown v. Jones

7 Watts 433 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1838