Case law

Commonwealth v. Brown

342 Pa. Super. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1985

Commonwealth v. Brown, 242 Pa.Super. 240 , 363 A.2d 1249 (1976). We held that Brown had effectively waived his right to trial by jury, and that his contentions on this point were frivolous. … Brown, 313 Pa.Super. 256 , 459 A.2d 837 (1983) (en banc); Commonwealth v. Cottman, 327 Pa.Super. 453 , 476 A.2d 40 (1984).

Brown v. Day

78 Pa. 129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1875

Rittenhouse, 1 Casey 491, in explaining the decision in Kite v. Brown, 5 Barr 291. … Hastings v.

Brown v. Marmaduke

248 Pa. 252 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1915

Brown and payable to Philip Brown, his father. The latter died in April, 1909, and his son died about six months thereafter. … Brown, he stated there was nothing due tl[e estate of Philip Brown from her deceased husband’s estate.

Brown v. Gresh

402 Pa. 35 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1960

Victor Brown, plaintiff-appellee, filed a complaint in equity, alleging that he and William P. … Petroleum Marketing Corporation v. Metropolitan Petroleum Corporation, 396 Pa. 48 , 151 A. 2d 616 (1959). Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Brown v. Kemmerer

214 Pa. 521 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1906

As was said by the United States Supreme Court in Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. Marbury, 91 U.

Commonwealth v. Brown

145 A.3d 723 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2016

Ruzyc v. Brown

320 Pa. 213 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1935

In McAbee v. … Ass’n et al v. Kahler, 320 Pa. 245 ; Stroh v. Kimmel, 8 Watts 157 ; Ardesco Oil Co. v. Mining Co., 66 Pa. 375, 381 ; McAbee v. Cribbs, supra; Equitable Trust Co. v. Nat.

Brown v. Arrott

6 Watts & Serg. 402 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1843

See Cartwright v. Hateley, (1 Vez. Jr. 292); Pinto v. Santos, (5 Taunt. 447); Stephens v. Badcock, (3 Barn. & Adol. 354). … Massey v. Banner, (1 Jac. & Walk. 245-8); 4 Madd. 413; Story on Agency 188, pl. 200. Because, as was said in Wren v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

195 A.3d 566 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 2018

Long v. Brown

399 Pa. Super. 312 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1990

See, Hessenthaler v. Farzin, 388 Pa.Super. 37 , 564 A.2d 990 (1989). In all, three documents were offered by appellants in an effort to overcome the Statute of Frauds. … In Hessenthaler v.

Brown v. Webb

1 Watts 411 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1833

See M’Lanahan v. M’Lanahan, 1 Penns. Rep. 112, 113; Brown v. Furor, 4 Serg. & Rawle 217, 218 ; Gause v. Wylie, 4 Serg. & Rawle 509 ; Moore v. Rees, 13 Serg. & Rawle 436 ; Otty and Wife v. Ferguson, 1 Rawle 294 . … Car. 295; Eyres v. Taunton, 2 Salk. 598; Panton v. Hall, Loll.

Brown v. Carey

149 Pa. 134 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1892

Justice McCollum, This is an action of ejectment brought by Henry Brown, appellant, against John F. Carey, appellee, for fifty acres of land in Bell township, Jefferson county. … Wilson & Son conveyed to Brown, Jan. 19, 1881. These facts are shown bj7 the records and deeds, and are undisputed. The defence made by the appellee is founded on his wife’s title.

Commonwealth v. Brown

302 Pa. Super. 391 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1982

CAVANAUGH, Justice: This is an appeal by Alfred Roy Brown from a judgment of sentence for robbery, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3701. … Commonwealth v.

Bruno v. Brown

414 Pa. 361 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 1964

Commonwealth v. Petrillo, 341 Pa. 209 , 19 A. 2d 288 (1941); Zubrod v. Kuhn, 357 Pa. 200 , 53 A. 2d 604 (1947). The issue on trial should not be confused through the introduction of collateral matters. See, City Prod. … Corp. v. Bennett Bros., 390 Pa. 398 , 135 A. 2d 924 (1957), and Stormer v. Alberts Const. Co., 401 Pa. 461 , 165 A. 2d 87 (1960).

Commonwealth v. Brown

222 Pa. Super. 742 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1972

Campbell v. Brown

183 Pa. 112 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1897

Brown v. Moorhead

8 Serg. & Rawle 569 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1822

This is an action of debt, brought by Samuel Moorhead, the plaintiff below, on a single bill given by Andrew Brown, the defendant below (and plaintiff in error,) to Abraham Sharra, and assigned by Sharra to the plaintiff.

Brown v. McFarland's

41 Pa. 129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1861

As compensation for their personal services they were not entitled to charge: Beatty v. Wray, 7 Harris 518. … Brown was allowed a full credit.

Brown v. Commonwealth

631 Pa. 607 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2015

Brown v. Hays

66 Pa. 229 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1870

was any board of revision about it.” … In Respublica v.