Case law

Brown v. Hughes

244 Pa. 397 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1914

Yerger v. Hunn, 231 Pa. 245 ; New Cumberland Borough v. Riverton Consolidated Water Co., 232 Pa. 531 ; Chisholm v. Thompson, 233 Pa. 181 . … In Baldridge v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

169 A.3d 595 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2017

Brown v. Scranton

313 Pa. 230 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1933

Per Curiam, These appeals raise the same question decided in Paraska v. Scranton [the preceding case]. … See also Ansell v. Philadelphia, 276 Pa. 370 , where we said: “The owner of premises containing something attractive to children is not always liable in damages because of injuries to one yielding to the attraction.”

Brown v. Bush

45 Pa. 61 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1863

Brown as servient owner might clear out the stone row, because it was on his land, and might raise his dam, so as to cause the same height of water on *65 Bush’s land as the stone row caused, but no more — not a jot more. … This natural power is as much the subject of property as land itself: McCalmont v. Whittaker, 3 Rawle 90 . How is this natural fall to be ascertained ? By instrumental levelling, says the plaintiff in error.

Brown v. Garman

169 A.3d 558 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 2017

Commonwealth v. Brown

511 Pa. 155 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1986

Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968). See also Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct. 2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977). … See Commonwealth v. Wheeler, 498 Pa. 374 , 446 A.2d 892 (1982).

Wolle v. Brown

4 Whart. 365 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1839

Rex v. Stone, (6 T R. 527.) … The only apparent exception to the rule, is found in Chambers v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

974 A.2d 1162 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 2009

Brown v. Fowzer

114 Pa. 446 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 1886

Commonwealth v. Brown

169 A.3d 34 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2017

Commonwealth v. Brown

164 A.3d 460 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2016

Commonwealth v. Brown

164 A.3d 465 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2016

Commonwealth v. Brown

164 A.3d 460 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2016

Commonwealth v. Brown

164 A.3d 460 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2016

Commonwealth v. Brown

443 Pa. 21 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1971

O’Neill had a revolver in his possession and Brown had a billy-club with him as they entered the store. … Hilberry v.

Hummel v. Brown

24 Pa. 310 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1855

terms of the obligation comprehend interest, it is inaccurate to say that interest is added by way of damages; for it is a substantive part of the debt, as much as the principal is, and is subject to the same remedies: Bank v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

639 Pa. 385 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2016

Commonwealth v. Brown

601 Pa. 480 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 2009

Brown v. Clark

14 Pa. 469 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1850

In Gage v. … It mattered not, therefore, to Clark, whether Brown has an actual interest in the note or not.

Commonwealth v. Brown

165 A.3d 892 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 2017