Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.62s
148 Pa. 387 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1892
Specific performance is of grace, and not of right: Pennock v. Freeman, 1 Watts, 409 ; Henderson v. Hays, 2 Watts, 148 ; Orne v. Kittanning Coal Co., 114 Pa. 172 ; Datz v. Phillips, 26 W. N. 512. … After referring to the fact that Brown testified he sent Byers to the office of Glenn & Son, defendant’s agents for sale of the property, to make inquiry in regard thereto; also, to what was suggested by Byers as to Brown
Cited 10 timesPublished169 A.3d 1083 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished298 Pa. 384 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1929
to questions of law raised in the record: Kuca v. … Brown, living next door to claimant and deceased, testified that callers seeking the “Browns” often went to her home by mistake, “and if anyone hollered ‘Mrs. Brown’ oftentimes both of us would go to the door.”
Cited 12 timesPublished169 A.3d 1071 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished616 Pa. 363 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2012
Cited 1 timesPublished75 Pa. 420 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1874
See the cases cited in the opinion of the present Chief Justice in Glidden v. Strupler, 2 P. F. Smith 402. … The case of Clark v. Thompson, 2 Jones 274 , relied on by the plaintiff in error, as almost exactly- parallel with that in hand, was a very peculiar one, and decided on its circumstances.
Cited 6 timesPublished176 A.3d 850 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished267 Pa. 24 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1920
This point is well taken, as we have frequently stated we will not decide moot questions or abstract principles of law: Winston v. Ladner, 264 Pa. 548, 550 , and cases cited. … L. 424, which provides: “In case of the death or withdrawal of any candidate nominated as herein provided, the party convention, primary meeting, caucus, or board of the citizens who nominated such candidate, may nominate
Cited 3 timesPublished170 A.3d 984 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished169 A.3d 1027 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished169 A.3d 1083 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished169 A.3d 1083 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished169 A.3d 1071 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished169 A.3d 1071 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished103 Pa. 546 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1883
Brown & Bro., as creditors, subscribed for bonds to the amount of $1,750. … Now, if these facts which appear in the testimony are true, and the transaction was unaffected by fraud, we think that as Aaron Balliet had parted with the property, in good faith, with the approval of the board of directors
Cited 12 timesPublished33 Pa. 247 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1859
The intent of the parties will control the technical words used: Jackson v. Myers, 3 Johns. 389 ; Neave v. Jenkins, 2 Yeates 107 ; Sherman v. Dill, 4 Yeates 295 ; Kenrick v. Smick, 7 W. & S. 41 . … Thus, in Foster v.
Cited 8 timesPublished169 A.3d 1048 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished170 A.3d 1052 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished295 Pa. 530 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1929
In Fortesque v. Carroll, 76 N. J. Eq. 583, Mr. … In Howland v. Andrus, 81 N. J.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna