Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

4,219 results

1.47s

  • Reese v. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform

    173 A.3d 1143 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2017

    PFUR then sets about trying to establish that these conditions are not met in the present appeal. PFUR’s Brief at 12. … The List qualifies as a "record” under the RTKL: "Record."

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Hackett

    534 Pa. 210 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1993

    These uncontradicted and corroborated facts, as a matter of law, established that Carter was not an accomplice. … Thus, the record clearly reflects, as the trial court judge found, that a contract to kill existed for purposes of 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(d)(2).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Martorano

    559 Pa. 533 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1999

    The prosecutorial misconduct in the case at bar clearly meets the Smith standard. … In either case, the conduct of the prosecution once established, places the defendant twice in jeopardy for the same crime."

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Martorano

    387 Pa. Super. 79 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 1989

    Only when her behavior clearly threatened and interfered with his ability to effectively preside over the case did he choose to issue the contempt citation. … Seemingly, the trial court has attempted to qualify Christie’s actions throughout the trial as a basis for her contempt convictions.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Goodheart v. Casey

    523 Pa. 188 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1989

    We have said, and now reaffirm, that a public employe has a contract right to continued membership in a retirement fund, under the same rules and regulations prevailing at the time of his employment, which may not be qualified … Clearly then, the question presently before the Court falls within the latter category.

    Cited 94 timesPublished
  • PA Dem Party. v. Boockvar Pet: Boockvar

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2020

    Petitioner accurately concedes that it must establish a clear right to this relief. Id. at ¶ 167; see Roberts v. Bd. of Directors of Sch. … Thus, Respondent believes that, in sum, these statutory directives clearly indicate that the General Assembly intended that electors either mail or personally deliver mail-in ballots to the established office addresses

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allegheny County Sportsmen's League v. Rendell

    580 Pa. 149 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 2004

    Additionally, “[s]ince sustaining the demurrer results in a denial of the pleader’s claim or dismissal of his suit, a preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer should be sustained only in cases that clearly and without … Thus, the applications/reeords of sale cannot be used to establish a registry of firearm ownership, i. e., a registry that tracks individuals who have possession and control over firearms.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • City of Philadelphia v. Ridge Avenue Passenger Railway Co.

    102 Pa. 190 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1883

    Does it signify any previous *197 dividend, whatever, or whenever declared, or is its sense qualified by the word annually, either as expressed in the context or understood ? We think this cannot be doubted. … The directors would be justly regarded by stockholders as derelict in duty, if they should suffer a tax to be imposed, when they had it clearly in their power to avoid it.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

    535 Pa. 108 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1993

    Under the statute and the regulations, qualified cogeneration and small power production facilities are referred to as qualifying facilities ("QFs") and must be certified by FERC as such. … The courts should refrain from making policy rulings for an agency unless the agency's acts are clearly illegal. That is not what occurred here.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Stilp v. Commonwealth

    588 Pa. 539 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 2006

    In these editorials, the Chief Justice posited that Act 44 established a salary structure which was beneficial for good government by attracting and retaining qualified public servants. … The Judges contend that cabinet-level officers certainly must qualify as “salaried officers of the Commonwealth.”

    Cited 138 timesPublished
  • Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    596 Pa. 317 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 2008

    The Manpower court held that a specially-equipped van qualified as an “appliance.” … Thus, whereas the provision of the Act requiring employers to pay for orthopedic appliances does not require the existence of a health care provider, the cost containment provision of the Act clearly does.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Griest

    196 Pa. 396 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 1900

    One relates to legislation only, and the other relates to the establishment of constitutional amendments. … We are very clearly of opinion, therefore, that such an order may now be made without the least material violation of the terms of the law proposing the amendments.

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Walker

    540 Pa. 80 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1995

    Clearly, by appellant’s own admission he was not under the influence of any mind altering substances at the time of his confession. … Third, appellant asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the Commonwealth “death qualifying” the jury.

    Cited 82 timesPublished
  • Galford v. Burkhouse

    330 Pa. Super. 21 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1984

    Accordingly, Leonard discussed with several of the children the question of which of them might be best qualified to manage the property for Leonard’s benefit and especially for his wife’s benefit. … Such evidence was clearly sufficient to establish a resulting trust in favor of Leonard or his estate. “The general principles involving resulting trusts are set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Trust (1959).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Perrin

    484 Pa. 188 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1979

    This evidence is clearly relevant to the question of whether appellant forced the victim into having sexual relations with him. … Both the police laboratory chemist and the medical examiner were eminently qualified to testify as expert witnesses.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Roman

    494 Pa. 440 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1981

    The standard of reviewing ineffectiveness claims is firmly established in this Commonwealth. … Section (d) clearly and unequivocally provides for the exclusion of certain periods of delay when determining the period for the commencement of trial.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Meerzon v. Erie Insurance

    380 Pa. Super. 386 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1988

    In common law arbitration, an award may not be vacated or modified "unless it is clearly shown that a party was denied a hearing or that fraud, misconduct, corruption or other irregularity caused the rendition of an unjust … The policy, like § 1702, required that the insured "promptly notify the police” in order to qualify for such coverage. Id. at 11 (R.R. at 121a).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Vanderlin

    398 Pa. Super. 21 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1990

    Whether the evidence was insufficient to establish that defendant took a substantial step toward the completion of the crime of attempted rape. III. … The evidence clearly established not only that she had ample opportunity to listen to the sound of his voice, but also that her attention was focused on what the assailant was saying to her throughout the attack.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Fox v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

    322 Pa. Super. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1984

    The moving party bears the burden of demonstrating clearly that there is no genuine issue of fact. Acker v. Palena, 260 Pa.Super. 214, 218-219 , 393 A.2d 1230, 1232 (1978) (citations omitted). … It appears that nearly every material fact is as yet still the subject of genuine dispute and that neither party is as yet clearly entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.

    377 Pa. Super. 9 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 1988

    In this case, the trial judge merely highlighted the only statement that he had heard introduced into evidence which would qualify as an oral express warranty. … Clearly then, if Rollins had been given leave to amend its answer to include the statute of frauds as a defense, the Cucchis would have suffered undue prejudice.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.