Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

2.93s

  • Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Martha Co.

    359 Pa. 347 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1948

    National Labor Relations Board v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 308 U. S. 241, 250 .” And in Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines, 303 U. S. 261, 270 , Mr. Justice Stone said: ". . . … Justice Reed in Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board, 324 U.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Schmidt v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    382 Pa. 521 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1955

    Prospect Park Board of Adjustment, 318 Pa. 582, 583-584 , 178 A. 813 . As stated by Mr. Chief Justice Steen in Walker v. … In Gratton v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Parisi v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    393 Pa. 458 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1958

    In Novello v. … In Scott v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • J.H. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    854 A.2d 440 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sylvester v. Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment

    398 Pa. 216 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1959

    Grange Zoning Case, supra; Richman v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 391 Pa. 254, 259, 260 , 137 A. 2d 280 ; Smolow v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 391 Pa. 71 , 137 A. 2d 251 ; Pincus v. Power, 376 Pa. 175 , 101 A. 2d 914 . … Springfield Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, 392 Pa. 269 , 140 A. 2d 597 ; Scranton Board of Zoning Appeals v. Silas, 393 Pa. 10 , 142 A. 2d 24 ; Caplan v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    537 Pa. 326 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1994

    The Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and a panel of the Commonwealth Court both affirmed. Berwick Industries v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Spaid), 146 Pa.Commw.Ct. 288 , 605 A.2d 463 (1992). … Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 508 Pa. 576, 586 , 499 A.2d 294, 299 (1985). See also Consulting Engineers Council of Pennsylvania v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Hasage v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    415 Pa. 31 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1964

    : Peirce v. … See, Best v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 106 , 141 A. 2d 606 (1958).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Mountain Village v. Board of Supervisors

    578 Pa. 196 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Riccardi v. Plymouth Township Board of Adjustment

    393 Pa. 337 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1958

    We declared in Silverco, Inc. v. … [subject to board approval].”

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement Board

    498 Pa. 103 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1981

    E.g., Dombrowski v. Philadelphia, 431 Pa. 199 , 245 A.2d 238 (1968); Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension Board, 378 Pa. 300 , 106 A.2d 233 (1954). … McBride v. Allegheny County Retirement Board, 330 Pa. 402, 405 , 199 A. 130, 131 (1938).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Shotkin v. Presbyterian Church Board of Pensions

    343 Pa. 650 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1941

    As the foreclosure proceedings were referred to by term and number in the bill and were thus made a part of the present record, the defense of res adjudicata could be raised by preliminary objections: Kowatch v. … A. §71, only a defendant has the right to seek removal from a state to a federal court: Shamrock Oil & Gas Corporation v. Sheets, 313 U. S. 100 . Decree affirmed, costs to be paid by appellants.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Cole v. Pennsylvania Board of Medicine

    577 Pa. 319 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cole v. Pennsylvania Board of Medicine

    845 A.2d 757 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gray v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    963 A.2d 1271 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 2009

    AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal *1272 is GRANTED, and the Order of the Commonwealth Court affirming the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board suspending Petitioner … The matter is hereby REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court, for remand to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, for remand to the workers’ compensation judge for reinstatement of petitioner’s benefits in light of the competent

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rebel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    555 Pa. 114 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1998

    Rossi v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 544 Pa. 261, 267 , 676 A.2d 194, 197 (1996). … Cited as the source of this balancing test is Simpson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 69 Pa.Cmwlth. 120 , 450 A.2d 305 (1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 822 , 104 S.Ct. 88 , 78 L.Ed.2d 97 (1983).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • McKinney v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    564 Pa. 669 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 2001

    The order of the Commonwealth Court is reversed based upon the decision in Philadelphia Newspapers, Pac. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, (Andrew Guaracino), 544 Pa. 203 , 675 A.2d 1213 (1996).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Collins v. Main Line Board of Realtors

    452 Pa. 342 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1973

    Schwartz v. Laundry & Linen Supply Drivers’ U., Etc., supra. In Associated Press v. … In Schwartz v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Express v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    519 Pa. 319 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1988

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kurman v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    351 Pa. 247 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1944

    As the court below said: “The facts are not in dispute and the questions raised by the facts are whether it was necessary for the plaintiffs to obtain the Board’s permission and, if so, whether the Board properly exercised … L. 1551, provides: “The Board of Adjustment shall have the following powers: ... 3.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Rapistan, Inc.

    472 Pa. 36 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1976

    See, e.g., Hillbrook Apartments, Inc. v. … The parties cannot, by consent, confer jurisdiction on the board of arbitration absent the necessary statutory authorization. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc., supra; Adam Eidermiller, Inc. v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.