Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.47s
Awacs, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board
559 Pa. 104 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1999
See Crown Communications v. Zoning Hearing Board of Borough of Glenfield, 550 Pa. 266 , 705 A.2d 427 (1997).
Cited 3 timesPublishedLandis v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
414 Pa. 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1964
The board acted favorably on the application and the plant was erected. … In addition, the board of adjustment laid down the proviso that:.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGoods v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
590 Pa. 132 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2006
The Board claims that the Commonwealth Court has held that the Board does not have such power. See Johnson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. and Parole, 890 A.2d 45 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006); Sanchez v. Pa. … Jr. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedVan Sciver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
396 Pa. 646 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1959
Novello v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 384 Pa. 294 , 121 A. 2d 91 (1956). … Moyerman v. Glanzberg, 391 Pa. 387 , 138 A. 2d 681 ; Landau Advertising Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 387 Pa. 552 , 128 A. 2d 559 (1957). §14-303(m). §14-503 (q).
Cited 27 timesPublishedBifalco v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
874 A.2d 1145 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 2005
Cited 0 timesPublishedHines v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
491 Pa. 142 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1980
Our decision today in Mitchell v. Board of Probation and Parole, 491 Pa. 291 , 420 A.2d 1324 (1980) confirms the rule established in Gaito v. … See Kunkelman v. Board of Probation and Parole, 40 Pa.Cmwlth. 149 , 396 A.2d 898 (1979); Jones v. Board of Probation and Parole, 43 Pa.Cmwlth. 169 , 401 A.2d 1247 (1979); Ryles v.
Cited 50 timesPublishedMilk Control Board v. Eisenberg Farm Products
332 Pa. 34 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1938
See Rohrer v. Milk Control Board, 322 Pa. 257 , where it was held that licensing and price-fixing had a direct and substantial relation to sanitation, public health and public welfare. … These provisions are also a protection against the danger of fraud to the producer and public so well described by President Judge Keller in Rohrer v. Milk Control Board, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTreon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
499 Pa. 455 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1982
Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 474 Pa. 351, 355 , 378 A.2d 829, 821 (1977). … Compare Davis v.
Cited 74 timesPublishedPowell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
638 Pa. 558 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017
See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … Slater v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedFuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
518 Pa. 59 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1988
Cited 1 timesPublishedReifsnyder v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
585 Pa. 474 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2005
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarris v. State Board of Optometrical Examiners
287 Pa. 531 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1926
State Board, 57 Colo. 74 ; Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 195 U. S. 233 . The manner or mode of exercising a lawful occupation may be regulated only in the interest of public health or to secure safety to the citizens. … As stated in Butcher v.
Cited 53 timesPublishedLucas v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
561 Pa. 607 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 2000
Co. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40 , 119 S.Ct. 977 , *608 143 L.Ed.2d 130 (1999), rev’g Sullivan v. Barnett, 139 F.3d 158 (3d Cir.1998).
Cited 1 timesPublishedLancaster County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
633 Pa. 294 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 2015
See id. at 1111 (citing Vulcan Basement Waterproofing v. NLRB, 219 F.3d 677 (7th Cir.2000); Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. NLRB, 177 F.3d 961 (11th Cir.1999); Pioneer Natural Gas Co. v. … Lancaster County v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedFrumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
466 Pa. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1976
Moyer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra. … See Davis v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 187 Pa.Super. 116 , 144 A.2d 452 (1958). In Morgan v.
Cited 247 timesPublishedPennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v. Pastor
441 Pa. 186 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1971
Va. 1969) (three-judge court), and Supermarkets General Corporation v. Sills, 93 N.J. Super. 326 , 225 A. 2d 728 (1966); in one state the provision has been held unconstitutional: Florida Board of Pharmacy v. … State Board v. Pastor, 85 Daup. 174, 179 (1966). No one can quarrel with this goal, but closer examination does not demonstrate that the advertising prohibition bears a substantial relation to it.
Disagreed with by Maryland Board of Pharmacy v. Sav-A-Lot, Inc., 270 Md. 103 (1973)Cited 30 timesPublishedFood Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
384 Pa. 288 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1956
there is evidence to sustain the court’s findings and whether the proceeding is free from a violation of law and any manifest abuse of discretion: Rolling Green Golf Club Case, 374 Pa. 450, 458 , 97 A. 2d 523, 527 ; Walker v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 380 Pa. 228, 230 , 110 A. 2d 414, 415 .
Cited 21 timesPublishedAyala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education
453 Pa. 584 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1973
Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 223 Pa. … Municipal University of Omaha, supra; Brown v. City of Omaha, supra; Parish v. Pitts, supra; Veach v. City of Phoenix, supra; Haney v. City of Lexington, supra; Sherbutte v. Marine City, supra; Rice v.
Overruled on other grounds by Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384 (1978)Cited 317 timesPublishedBerks County Courthouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
570 Pa. 463 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2002
The Commonwealth Court’s order is vacated and the matter remanded for reconsideration in light of Vista Int’l Hotel v. WCAB (Daniels), 560 Pa.12, 742 A.2d 649 (1999) and this Court’s order in Hill v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFleming v. Prospect Park Board of Adjustment
318 Pa. 582 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1935
Per Curiam, This is an appeal from a decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County affirming the action of the Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Prospect Park in refusing to issue to Veronica L. … This is not sufficient to warrant interference by us in a matter which was, in any event, primarily one of discretion with the board of adjustment.
Cited 36 timesPublished
Ask Donna