Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.69s

  • Martin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    539 Pa. 442 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1995

    Martin v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Emmaus Bakery), 161 Pa.Cmwlth.Ct. 637, 638 A.2d 294 (1994). … Peterson v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (PRN Nursing Agency), 528 Pa. 279 , 597 A.2d 1116 (1991).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kochanowicz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    624 Pa. 307 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2014

    AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Payes v. … Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (State Police), — Pa. -, 79 A.3d 543, 552 (2013) (holding that, because psychic injury cases are highly fact-sensitive, a reviewing court must give deference to the factfinding functions

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Packler v. State Employes' Retirement Board

    487 Pa. 51 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1979

    Packler v. State Emp. Retirement Bd., 470 Pa. 368 , 368 A.2d 673 (1977). … Packler v. State Employes’ Ret. Bd., 33 Pa. Cmwlth. 452, 382 A.2d 158 (1978). This appeal followed. In Valley F. Racing Ass'n v. St. H.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cable v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    541 Pa. 611 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1995

    The Commonwealth Court reversed, reinstating benefits, relying on J & L Steel Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Jones), 145 Pa.Cmwlth. 201 , 602 A.2d 912 (1992). … See Cable v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Bd.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Minor v. Board of Probation & Parole

    621 Pa. 104 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Minor v. Board of Probation & Parole

    73 A.3d 575 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Petition to Submit Ballot Question to Concord Township Voters

    632 Pa. 311 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2015

    Focht v. Focht, 613 Pa. 48, 52 , 32 A.3d 668, 670 (2011). … Although the lower court opinions list Brown and Concord First, a local citizens group, as Appellants, since Brown is a pro se litigant, she cannot represent Concord First. .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Dowhower v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    587 Pa. 132 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2006

    19th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above-captioned matter is hereby GRANTED and the order of the Commonwealth Court in this matter is VACATED and REVERSED based on the decision in Gardner v. … Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Genesis Health Ventures), 888 A.2d 758 (2005).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hoffman Mining Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    612 Pa. 598 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2011

    Hoffman Mining Company, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adams Township, 958 A.2d 602, 611 (Pa.Cmwlth.2008). … Hoffman Mining Co., Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adams Township, 603 Pa. 68 , 981 A.2d 1284 (2009).

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Vecchia

    517 Pa. 349 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1988

    DISCUSSION In Ellenbogen v. County of Allegheny, 479 Pa. 429 , 388 A.2d 730 (1978), Sweet v. PLRB, 479 Pa. 449 , 388 A.2d 740 (1978) (Sweet II), and Board of Judges, etc. v. … In County of Lehigh v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Spahn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    598 Pa. 108 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2008

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coleman v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    413 Pa. 103 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1964

    The Board had denied the use permit which Coleman sought. … We find no clear abuse of discretion or error of law by the Board of Adjustment. Valley Forge Industries Inc. Appeal, 406 Pa. 387 , 177 A. 2d 450 ; Brennen v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 409 Pa. 376 , 187 A. 2d 180 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Batoff v. State Board of Psychology

    561 Pa. 419 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 18, 2000

    ); Barran v. … I-V. 8 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Schmidt v. Allegheny County Retirement Board

    394 Pa. 105 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1958

    Baker v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, 374 Pa. 165 , 97 A. 2d 231 (1953), and Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension Board, 378 Pa. 300 , 106 A. 2d 233 (1954). … In Mauch v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brecht v. Board of Public Education

    330 Pa. 331 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1938

    The Board originally refused this request, and appellant petitioned for a declaratory judgment in the court below. After hearing judgment was entered for the Board. … After the decision of this Court in the Teachers’ Tenure Act Gases, 329 Pa. 213 , to which neither appellant nor the Board was a party, the Board adopted resolutions that the term of service in all of its contracts shall

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stokes v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    402 Pa. 508 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1961

    After being served with a notice of violation by the zoning administrator, the appellant, Samuel Stokes, Jr., filed an application with the appellee Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) in which he sought permits for (1) the … The Board heard additional testimony from both sides and subsequently published supplemental findings reaffirming its original decision. The testimony before the Board can be summarized as follows.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kennelty v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    594 Pa. 12 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2007

    See Daniels v. WCAB (Tristate Transp.), 574 Pa. 61 , 828 A.2d 1043, 1052 (2003) (holding that the WCJ is the ultimate finder of fact and the exclusive arbiter of credibility and evidentiary weight). … See also RAG (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, L.P. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Salvitti v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    429 Pa. 330 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1968

    zoning board of adjustment, contrary to the rule that where no further testimony is taken by the court, the findings and conclusions of the zoning board of adjustment must stand unless the record reveals a flagrant abuse … This court said in Cleaver v. Board of Adjustment, 414 Pa. 367 : “Generally speaking, spot zoning is the arbitrary and unreasonable classification and zoning of a small parcel of land.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • O'Rourke v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    626 Pa. 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2014

    The issue, rephrased for clarity, is: (1) Is Claimant’s injury compensable pursuant to § 301(c) of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act and in terms of the decisions in Malky v. … Kiskiminetas Valley Coal Co. et al., 278 Pa. 552 , 123 A. 505 (1924) and Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Slaugenhaupt) v. U.S. Steel Corp., 31 Pa.Cmwlth.329, 376 A.2d 271 (1977).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cruz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    616 Pa. 549 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2012

    b) Did the Commonwealth Court err in failing to consider its own holding in Brehm v. WCAB (Hygienic Sanitation Co.), 782 A.2d 1077 (Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.