Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.39s
Eves v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
401 Pa. 211 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1960
Best v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 106, 110 , 141 A. 2d 606 (1958). … Again, there is scrutinizing court review to assure that the board has not overstepped its boundaries of prudent discretion. See, e.g., Kotzin v.
Superseded — as noted by a later courtCited 46 timesPublishedGunter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
573 Pa. 386 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 2003
Gunter v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia), 771 A.2d 865 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001). … Thompson v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (USF&G and Craig Welding Equipment Rental), 566 Pa.420, 781 A.2d 1146, 1150 (2001) (citing LTV Steel v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 2021
No. 13 MM 2021 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL BOARD, :
Cited 0 timesPublishedFidler v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
408 Pa. 260 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1962
Since the issue was decided by the court below solely upon the record before the board, the scope of our review is limited to whether or not the evidence supports the board’s factual findings and whether or not the board … abused its discretion or committed an error of law in making its decision: Tidewater Oil Co. v.
Cited 68 timesPublishedBanic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
550 Pa. 276 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 24, 1997
Kachinski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240, 248 , 532 A.2d 374, 378 (1987). … See Brown v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), 134 Pa.
Cited 34 timesPublishedWeidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
497 Pa. 516 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1982
Weidner v. … Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, supra.
Cited 36 timesPublishedGross v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
424 Pa. 603 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1967
Since no additional testimony was taken in the court below, our review is limited to the determination of whether or not the Board committed an error of law or was guilty of a manifest abuse of discretion: Brennen v. … See Brennen v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra; Eitnier v. Kreitz Corp., 404 Pa. 406, 410-11 , 172 A. 2d 320 (1961); Peirce Appeal, 384 Pa. 100, 105 , 119 A. 2d 506 (1956); Firth v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedDonahue v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
412 Pa. 332 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 1963
this Court in Eves v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 401 Pa. 211 , 164 A. 2d 7 (1960).
Cited 21 timesPublishedBailey v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
569 Pa. 147 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2002
See Lindy Homes, Inc. v. … Bd. of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, 437 *167 Pa. 481 , 263 A.2d 426, 431-32 (1970) (zoning board properly granted a de minimis variance to allow increase of approximately 4% of the width in a one-acre lot); Swemley v
Cited 50 timesPublishedSweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
457 Pa. 456 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1974
E.g., Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Overbrook Golf Club, 385 Pa. *462 358 , 123 A.2d 698 (1956); Locust Club v. Hotel and Club Employees’ Union, 397 Pa. 357 , 155 A.2d 27 (1959). … McColligan v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 214 Pa. 229 , 63 A. 792 (1906). See, also Smalich v. Westfall, 440 Pa. 409 , 269 A.2d 476 (1970); Ragano v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co., 376 Pa. 271 , 101 A.2d 686 (1954).
Cited 65 timesPublishedBowers v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
402 Pa. 542 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1961
In McSorley v. … In Watson v.
Cited 33 timesPublishedEkin v. Board of Commissioners
516 Pa. 19 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1987
Cited 2 timesPublishedNicholson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
392 Pa. 278 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1958
In addition to the fact that Terminals, Inc. was both the applicant and appellant to the Board on the record, we have recently held in Richman v. … Landau Advertising Co., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment et al., 387 Pa. 552 , 128 A. 2d 559 . The ordinance in the present case designates the uses permitted in a B Business District as: “Section 9 (a) . . .
Cited 27 timesPublishedLash v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
491 Pa. 294 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1980
See Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co., 473 Pa. 369 , 374 A.2d 689 (1977); Staller v. Staller, 343 Pa. 86 , 21 A.2d 16 (1941); Associated Hospital Services of Phila. v. … Overmyer Mold Co., supra; Plasteel Products Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, supra; General Tire and Rubber Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 16 Pa.Cmwlth. 473 , 332 A.2d 867 (1975).
Cited 27 timesPublishedCrown Communications v. Zoning Hearing Board
550 Pa. 266 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1997
Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550, 555 , 462 A.2d 637, 639 (1983). … .; Abbey v. Zoning Hearing Board, 126 Pa. Cmwlth. 235, 559 A.2d 107 (1989).
Cited 35 timesPublishedSilver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
435 Pa. 99 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1969
See, e.g.: William Chersky Joint Enterprises v. Board of Adjustment, 426 Pa. 33, 36 , 231 A. 2d 757 (1967) ; Jackson v. … See e.g.: Jackson v. Pottstown Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra n. 4, at 539. See: Everson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 395 Pa. 168 , 149 A. 2d 63 (1959).
Cited 74 timesPublishedPatricca v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
527 Pa. 267 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1991
Northwestern Distributors, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board, 526 Pa. 186 , 584 A.2d 1372 (1991); Appeal of Miller, 511 Pa. 631 , 515 A.2d 904 (1986). … The Board, therefore, erred in granting approval of the parking area in an S district as a Community Parking Area under an Administrator’s exception. V.
Cited 33 timesPublishedJudicial Inquiry & Review Board v. Snyder
514 Pa. 142 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1987
Pleas of Philadelphia County and two petitions filed by Judge Snyder. 1 The Board’s recommendation is based on its findings: that in the case of Edgehill v. … Curry v. Parkhouse, 468 Pa. 542 , 364 A.2d 326 (1976); Meyer v. Strouse, 422 Pa. 136 , 221 A.2d 191 (1966). The election results, however, have not ended our responsibility where other issues remain. Powell v.
Cited 35 timesPublishedWorkmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Hartlieb
465 Pa. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1975
Curran v. Walter E. *253 Knipe and Sons, Inc., 185 Pa.Super. 450 , 547, 138 A.2d 251, 255 (1958). See also Wall v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 12 Pa.Cmwlth. 12 , 315 A.2d 656 (1974); Hershey Estates v. … See Hartlieb v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 12 Pa.Cmwlth. 118 , 314 A.2d 519 *254 (1974).
Disapproved — as noted by a later courtCited 50 timesPublishedSheedy v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
409 Pa. 655 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1963
Simon & Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 403 Pa. 176 , 168 A. 2d 317 . … Kownacki, 396 Pa. 283 , 152 A. 2d 456 ; Moyerman v.
Limited by Pae v. Hilltown Township Zoning Hearing Board, 35 Pa. Commw. 229 (1978)Cited 38 timesPublished
Ask Donna