Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersortc

1,240 results

2.17s

  • Roy Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

    7 Or. Tax 95 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 16, 1977

    Bd. v. Dept. of Rev., 263 Or 287 , 502 P2d 251 (1972). … The case of Handlery v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Vilhauer v. Lane County Assessor, Tc-Md 080155d (or.tax 7-31-2008)

    Oregon Tax Court · Jul 31, 2008

    Kaady v. Dept. of Rev. , 15 OTR 124 , 125 (2000). … Parks Westsac L.L.C. v. Dept. of Rev ., 15 OTR 50 , 52 (1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Portland v. Smith

    12 Or. Tax 208 · Oregon Tax Court · May 18, 1992

    See Comeaux v. … Brown, Correlating Municipal Liability and Official Immunity Under Section 1983, 1989 U Ill L Rev 625, 630 (citation omitted).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Niemela v. Dept. of Rev.

    Oregon Tax Court · May 2, 2019

    For instance, the rule provided the example of “Kirk,” a nonresident working on board “a vessel plying the Columbia River. … IRC § 162(a)(2); Treas Reg § 1.162–2(e); Comm’r v. Flowers, 326 US 465, 66 S Ct 250, 90 L Ed 203 (1946). In Bogue v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Department of Revenue

    11 Or. Tax 101 · Oregon Tax Court · Oct 27, 1988

    Church v. Dept. of Rev., supra; Multnomah School of Bible v. Mult. Co., supra. … YMCA v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • MPA LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Oct 28, 2025

    When ORS 305.287 was enacted in 2011, it modified the rule of Nepom v. … Phase II v. Dept. of Rev., 356 Or 164, 169-170, 339 P3d 428 (2014).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Welch v. Unified Sewerage Agency

    12 Or. Tax 359 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 29, 1992

    “We have described ‘the root requirement’ of the Due Process Clause as being ‘that an individual be given an opportunity for a hearing before he is deprived of any significant *365 property interest.’ ” Cleveland Board of … Education v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Olympia Brewing Co. v. Department of Revenue

    5 Or. Tax 99 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 25, 1972

    States Portland Cement Co. v. … States Portland Cement Co., supra, and Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. Collector of Revenue, 359 US 28, 79 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cress v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Dec 16, 2011

    Plaintiff at some point filed a petition with the county board of property tax appeals (Board), seeking value reductions for the 2007-08 tax year. (Ptf‟s Response to Motion to Dismiss at 1.) … Downer v. Dept. of Rev., TC No 4952, WL 2037643 at *5 (May 2011) (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Johnson v. Department of Revenue

    17 Or. Tax 51 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 13, 2001

    See Schlicher v. C.I.R., 73 TCM (CCH) 1801, 1805 (1997). … appeals (Board).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Petite Shangri-La LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Mar 2, 2026

    See Zervis v. Dept. of Rev., 20 OTR 79 (2010) (finding the same). … ORS 305.275(3) (“If a taxpayer may appeal to the property value appeals board under ORS 309.100, then no appeal may be allowed under this section.”).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nutbrown v. Munn

    11 Or. Tax 294 · Oregon Tax Court · Oct 4, 1989

    In Patsy v. … See Stufflebaum v. Panethiere, 91 SW2d 271 (Mo S Ct 1985); Raschke v. Blancher, 141 Ill App 3d 813, 491 NE2d 1171 (1986); and Linderkamp v. Bismarck School District No. 1, 397 NW2d 76 (ND S Ct 1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Worldmark the Club v. Klamath Cnty. Asses., Tc-Md 050856b (or.tax 3-1-2011)

    Oregon Tax Court · Mar 1, 2011

    S ee e.g. , Worldmark, The Club, and Residence Club At Seaside Owners Association, v. … The instant appeal, Worldmark, The Club v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hasty v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Nov 27, 2012

    ALISON HASTY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) TC-MD 120511C ) v. … Defendant was represented by Barry Dayton and Doug Brown, appraisers with the Multnomah County Assessor’s office.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • McCollum v. State Tax Commission

    2 Or. Tax 486 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 13, 1967

    Melvin in all instances approved the sales price of the logs and the payments were remitted by the buyers directly to Melvin who paid Putnam $22 per thousand board feet for the selling, falling, bucking and hauling. … Peebles v. Commissioner, 5 TC 14 (1945); Estate of M. M. Stark v. Commissioner, 45 BTA 882 (1941); J. J. Carrol v. Commissioner, 27 *492 BTA 65 (1932); and John W. Blodgett v. Commissioner, 13 BTA 1388 (1928).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Yanez v. Washington County Assessor

    18 Or. Tax 276 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 22, 2005

    Taxpayers appealed that assessment to the Board of Property Tax Appeals (BOPTA), which ruled in favor of the county. … V.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Marion County Assessor v. Department of Revenue

    10 Or. Tax 265 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 22, 1986

    In Olsen v. … In Freightliner Corp. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Leitch v. Department of Revenue

    13 Or. Tax 115 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 6, 1994

    The United States Supreme Court in Juilliard v. … As this court stated in Leitch v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jayne v. Department of Revenue

    6 Or. Tax 251 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 11, 1975

    The court in Board of Regents U. W. v. … In the case of People v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Clatsop County Assessor, Tc-Md 090858b (or.tax 3-12-2010)

    Oregon Tax Court · Mar 12, 2010

    The 2008-09 Clatsop County Board of Property Tax Appeals (BOPTA) affirmed Defendant's total RMV at $229,000. Plaintiffs seek $162,000 RMV. That is based on their acquisition price in October 2008. … Feves v. Dept. of Revenue , 4 OTR 302 , 312 (1971). *Page 3 "[I]f the evidence is inconclusive or unpersuasive, the taxpayer will have failed to meet his burden of proof * * *." Reed v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.