Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,240 results
2.17s
Roy Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
7 Or. Tax 95 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 16, 1977
Bd. v. Dept. of Rev., 263 Or 287 , 502 P2d 251 (1972). … The case of Handlery v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedVilhauer v. Lane County Assessor, Tc-Md 080155d (or.tax 7-31-2008)
Oregon Tax Court · Jul 31, 2008
Kaady v. Dept. of Rev. , 15 OTR 124 , 125 (2000). … Parks Westsac L.L.C. v. Dept. of Rev ., 15 OTR 50 , 52 (1999).
Cited 0 timesPublished12 Or. Tax 208 · Oregon Tax Court · May 18, 1992
See Comeaux v. … Brown, Correlating Municipal Liability and Official Immunity Under Section 1983, 1989 U Ill L Rev 625, 630 (citation omitted).
Cited 3 timesPublishedOregon Tax Court · May 2, 2019
For instance, the rule provided the example of “Kirk,” a nonresident working on board “a vessel plying the Columbia River. … IRC § 162(a)(2); Treas Reg § 1.162–2(e); Comm’r v. Flowers, 326 US 465, 66 S Ct 250, 90 L Ed 203 (1946). In Bogue v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedYoung Men's Christian Ass'n v. Department of Revenue
11 Or. Tax 101 · Oregon Tax Court · Oct 27, 1988
Church v. Dept. of Rev., supra; Multnomah School of Bible v. Mult. Co., supra. … YMCA v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMPA LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Oct 28, 2025
When ORS 305.287 was enacted in 2011, it modified the rule of Nepom v. … Phase II v. Dept. of Rev., 356 Or 164, 169-170, 339 P3d 428 (2014).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWelch v. Unified Sewerage Agency
12 Or. Tax 359 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 29, 1992
“We have described ‘the root requirement’ of the Due Process Clause as being ‘that an individual be given an opportunity for a hearing before he is deprived of any significant *365 property interest.’ ” Cleveland Board of … Education v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOlympia Brewing Co. v. Department of Revenue
5 Or. Tax 99 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 25, 1972
States Portland Cement Co. v. … States Portland Cement Co., supra, and Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. Collector of Revenue, 359 US 28, 79 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedCress v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Dec 16, 2011
Plaintiff at some point filed a petition with the county board of property tax appeals (Board), seeking value reductions for the 2007-08 tax year. (Ptf‟s Response to Motion to Dismiss at 1.) … Downer v. Dept. of Rev., TC No 4952, WL 2037643 at *5 (May 2011) (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJohnson v. Department of Revenue
17 Or. Tax 51 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 13, 2001
See Schlicher v. C.I.R., 73 TCM (CCH) 1801, 1805 (1997). … appeals (Board).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPetite Shangri-La LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Mar 2, 2026
See Zervis v. Dept. of Rev., 20 OTR 79 (2010) (finding the same). … ORS 305.275(3) (“If a taxpayer may appeal to the property value appeals board under ORS 309.100, then no appeal may be allowed under this section.”).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished11 Or. Tax 294 · Oregon Tax Court · Oct 4, 1989
In Patsy v. … See Stufflebaum v. Panethiere, 91 SW2d 271 (Mo S Ct 1985); Raschke v. Blancher, 141 Ill App 3d 813, 491 NE2d 1171 (1986); and Linderkamp v. Bismarck School District No. 1, 397 NW2d 76 (ND S Ct 1986).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWorldmark the Club v. Klamath Cnty. Asses., Tc-Md 050856b (or.tax 3-1-2011)
Oregon Tax Court · Mar 1, 2011
S ee e.g. , Worldmark, The Club, and Residence Club At Seaside Owners Association, v. … The instant appeal, Worldmark, The Club v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHasty v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Nov 27, 2012
ALISON HASTY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) TC-MD 120511C ) v. … Defendant was represented by Barry Dayton and Doug Brown, appraisers with the Multnomah County Assessor’s office.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMcCollum v. State Tax Commission
2 Or. Tax 486 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 13, 1967
Melvin in all instances approved the sales price of the logs and the payments were remitted by the buyers directly to Melvin who paid Putnam $22 per thousand board feet for the selling, falling, bucking and hauling. … Peebles v. Commissioner, 5 TC 14 (1945); Estate of M. M. Stark v. Commissioner, 45 BTA 882 (1941); J. J. Carrol v. Commissioner, 27 *492 BTA 65 (1932); and John W. Blodgett v. Commissioner, 13 BTA 1388 (1928).
Cited 1 timesPublishedYanez v. Washington County Assessor
18 Or. Tax 276 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 22, 2005
Taxpayers appealed that assessment to the Board of Property Tax Appeals (BOPTA), which ruled in favor of the county. … V.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMarion County Assessor v. Department of Revenue
10 Or. Tax 265 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 22, 1986
In Olsen v. … In Freightliner Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLeitch v. Department of Revenue
13 Or. Tax 115 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 6, 1994
The United States Supreme Court in Juilliard v. … As this court stated in Leitch v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJayne v. Department of Revenue
6 Or. Tax 251 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 11, 1975
The court in Board of Regents U. W. v. … In the case of People v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWells v. Clatsop County Assessor, Tc-Md 090858b (or.tax 3-12-2010)
Oregon Tax Court · Mar 12, 2010
The 2008-09 Clatsop County Board of Property Tax Appeals (BOPTA) affirmed Defendant's total RMV at $229,000. Plaintiffs seek $162,000 RMV. That is based on their acquisition price in October 2008. … Feves v. Dept. of Revenue , 4 OTR 302 , 312 (1971). *Page 3 "[I]f the evidence is inconclusive or unpersuasive, the taxpayer will have failed to meet his burden of proof * * *." Reed v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna