Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersortc

1,240 results

1.31s

  • Centennial Medical Group, Inc. v. Douglas County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Jun 6, 2014

    Agarwal testified that he is one of three members of the board of directors. … Mercy Medical Center, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev., 12 OTR 305, 307 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Centennial Medical Group, Inc. v. Douglas County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Jun 6, 2014

    Agarwal testified that he is one of three members of the board of directors. … Mercy Medical Center, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev., 12 OTR 305, 307 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kryl v. Lane County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Jun 21, 2012

    The combined RMV found by the Lane County Board of Property Tax Appeals was $726,929; the combined maximum assessed value (MAV) and assessed value (AV) was $510,343 (Ptf‟s Compl at 2-4.) … Richardson v Clackamas County Assessor, TC-MD No 020869D, WL 21263620, at *2 (Mar 26, 2003) (citing Gangle v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 343, 345 (1995)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Smith v. Dept. of Rev.

    Oregon Tax Court · May 17, 2016

    Zimmerman v. Zimmerman, 175 Or 585, 591, 155 P2d 293 (1945). … Feves v. Dept. of Revenue, 4 OTR 302, 312 (1971). “[I]f the evidence is inconclusive or unpersuasive, the taxpayer will have failed to meet [his] burden of proof * * *.” Reed v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Greenberg v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Jun 12, 2020

    Magno v. Dept. of Rev., 19 OTR 51, 63-64 (2006) (citing Hoxie v. Dept. of Rev., 15 OTR 322, 326 (2001).) … Strom v. Dept. of Rev., 15 OTR 309, 310 (2001).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Philly, LLC v. Hood River County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Nov 19, 2025

    Tax roll and requested relief Defendant placed a real market value of $3,854,690 on the 2023-24 tax roll, which was upheld by the board of property tax appeals. (Compl at 3-4.) … Hewlett- Packard Co. v. Benton County Assessor, 21 OTR 186, 188 (2013), aff’d, 357 Or 598, 356 P3d 70 (2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Mendoza v. Dept. of Rev.

    Oregon Tax Court · Sep 14, 2016

    Riley Hill General Contractor v. Tandy Corp., 303 Or 390, 394, 737 P2d 595 (1987). … In Tilbury v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Harris v. Dept. of Rev.

    Oregon Tax Court · Jan 4, 2017

    In Noyce v. Comm’r, 97 TC 670, 672-76 (1991), the taxpayer, vice chairman of the Intel board, used his private jet for some company travel. … Cohan v. Comm’r, 39 F2d 540, 543-44 (2d Cir 1930). The estimate must have a reasonable evidentiary basis. Vanicek v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Newberg Business Center, LLC v. Yamhill County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Mar 17, 2014

    The board of property tax appeals reduced that value to $620,000. (Id.) The 2012-13 maximum assessed value was $568,697. (Id.) … The Oregon Supreme Court in Ernst Brothers Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Susbauer Road LLC v. Washington County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · May 9, 2024

    ORS 305.427; Feves v. … See The Oregon Bank v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Pastega Investment Company LLC v. Benton County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · May 6, 2016

    The board of property tax appeals reduced the subject property’s 2014-15 real market value to $495,008. (See id.) II. … Price v. Dept. of Rev., 7 OTR 18, 25 (1977).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Linstrom v. Lincoln County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Nov 16, 2018

    Richardson v. Clackamas County Assessor, TC-MD 020869D, WL 21263620 at *2 (Or Tax M Div Mar 26, 2003) (citing Gangle v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 343, 345 (1995)). … Kem v. Dept. of Rev., 267 Or 111, 114, 514 P2d 1335 (1973). 1.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Fair Oaks Apartments LLC v. Washington County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Apr 3, 2012

    Richardson v. Clackamas County Assessor (Richardson), TC-MD No 020869D, WL 21263620 at *2 (Mar 26, 2003) (citing Gangle v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 343, 345 (1995)). … Feves v. Dept. of Revenue, 4 OTR 302, 312 (1971).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Macy's Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Lane County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Jan 24, 2020

    Feves v. Dept. of Revenue, 4 OTR 302, 312 (1971). To meet its burden, Plaintiff must “provide competent evidence of the [real market value] of their property.” Woods v. Dept. of Rev., 16 OTR 56, 59 (2002). … Magno v. Dept. of Rev., 19 OTR 51, 55 (2006) (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tivnu: Building Justice v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Nov 15, 2016

    Services v. Dept. of Rev. … The Supreme Court distinguished the prior case of Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kohler v. Douglas County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Oct 4, 2012

    On April 18, 2011, Plaintiffs appealed the RMV and EV contained in the 2010-11 Board of Property Tax Appeal (BOPTA) Order, as well as the same values for tax year 2009-10; at trial, Plaintiffs withdrew the 2010-11 tax year … Kaady v. Dept. of Rev., 15 OTR 124, 125 (2000); Sherman v. Dept. of Rev., 17 OTR 322 (2004).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Dorchester House Ret. Cmty. LLC v. Lincoln County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Dec 2, 2014

    Richardson v. … Partnership v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Int'l Leadership Academy v. Clackamas County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Dec 7, 2018

    See PGE v. … In Full Circle Family Church v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Deschutes County Assessor v. Leszar

    Oregon Tax Court · Jan 9, 2018

    Magno v. … See also Ellis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Pittelli v. Washington County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Jan 21, 2014

    Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 7, documents provided before the board of property tax appeals (BOPTA), was admitted over Defendant’s objection to its relevance. … Anderson v. Lane County Assessor, TC-MD 090298 at 6 (Nov 17, 2009).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.