Case law

In Re Allen Care Centers, Inc.

175 B.R. 397 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 22, 1994

It relies on analogies to the *399 progeny of two Supreme Court cases, Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Dept. of Envir. Protection, 474 U.S. 494 , 106 S.Ct. 755 , 88 L.Ed.2d 859 (1986), and Reading Co. v. … Brown, 391 U.S. 471 , 88 S.Ct. 1759 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968). 1.

Poland v. Chertoff

559 F. Supp. 2d 1127 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 20, 2008

VERDICT, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (On Remand) BROWN, District Judge. … In Bernhardt v.

Foster v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 21, 2021

Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. … Brown _______________________________________ ANNA J.

Duffy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 19, 2019

Bayliss v. Barnhart, 427 F.3d 1211, 1218 (9th Cir. 2005). “[I]n the absence of any 3 A taper places tape and adhesive symbols on sheets of mylar consistent with a drawing of a printed circuit board. See tr. 348. … Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 734 F.2d 1378, 1381 (9th Cir. 1984) (quoting Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983)).

Far West Federal Bank, S.B. v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision

738 F. Supp. 1559 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 4, 1990

Plaintiffs, Far West Federal Bank (Far West) and a number of its investors (Investors), bring this action against the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB), the Federal … Caminetti v. *1562 United States, 242 U.S. 470, 485 , 37 S.Ct. 192, 194 , 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917).

Far West Federal Bank, S.B. v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision

746 F. Supp. 1042 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 14, 1990

Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 986, 1005-06 , 104 S.Ct. 2862, 2874-75 , 81 L.Ed.2d 815 (1984); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Assistance Corp. v. Cavazos, 902 F.2d 617, 628 (8th Cir.1990); Ohio Student Loan Comm’n v. Cavazos, 900 F.2d 894, 901-02 (6th Cir.1990); South Carolina State Educ. Assistance Auth. v.

United States v. Wada

323 F. Supp. 2d 1079 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 29, 2004

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). 2 . After the evidentiary hearing, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Blakely v.

Natkin

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 5, 2026

First, in Brown v. … The F&R properly considered the effect of Brown on the facts at hand. Second, in First Federal Bank v. BLC Water Co.

United States v. Trent

718 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 3, 1989

In United States v. … Brown, 859 F.2d 974, 977 (D.C.Cir.1988). The courts have generally recognized a strong presumption that the prosecutor’s discretion has been lawfully exercised. United States v.

Collegenet, Inc. v. Common Application, Inc.

104 F. Supp. 3d 1137 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 15, 2015

See Warren v. … Brunswick Corp. v. Riegel Textile Corp., 752 F.2d 261, 266 (7th Cir.1984). Hence the , often repeated. phrase — antitrust laws were enacted for “the protection of competition, not competitors.” Brown Shoe Co. v.

Erickson v. Courtney

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 7, 2020

Coleman v. … Based on this procedural history, this Court concludes that Judge Brown’s decision denying these grounds as procedurally defaulted is “law of the case.” See Sechrest v.

Aragon v. RISE Law Group, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 30, 2024

Kerr v. Screen Actors Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir. 1975). The court need only consider the factors not already subsumed in the initial lodestar calculation. Fischer v. SUB-P. … Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 (1984); United States v. $28,000 in U.S. Currency, 802 F.3d 1100, 1 105 (9th Cir. 2015).

Chavez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 26, 2019

Meserow, subject to the satisfaction of Plaintiffs debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. … BROWN, United States Senior District Judge Submitted by: Nancy J. Meserow, OSB No. 820895 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Nancy J. Meserow Nancy J.

National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service

592 F. Supp. 931 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 6, 1984

In California v. … In Sierra Club v.

EMCASCO Insurance Company v. Cartwright

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 17, 2021

NOPC’s Board of Directors sent the party invitations to guests “almost all of whom were employed by or otherwise associated with” NOPC. Id. … The plaintiff alleged Ureta was covered by an insurance policy issued to the Browne-Hardy Clinic, a partnership of medical professionals. Ureta was not an individual partner of Browne-Hardy, but “Segismundo Z.

Lumbreras v. Roberts

319 F. Supp. 2d 1191 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 26, 2004

As the investigation progressed, Lumbr-eras or his attorneys, either Kim Hoyt or James Brown, remained in contact with BOLI. … O’Bannon v.

United States v. Vasquez

843 F. Supp. 2d 1147 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 8, 2012

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … Id. at 1155 (quoting United States v. Riggins, 40 F.3d 1055, 1057 (9th Cir.1994)).

Donaldson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 18, 2021

$6,640.63 will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, subject to verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. … Brown ANNA J. BROWN U.S.

Robinson v. Malheur Publishing Co.

272 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 11, 1967

Rugger v. Mt. Hood Elec. Co., 143 Or. 193 , 20 P.2d 412 , 21 P.2d 1100 (1933), supports this view. … Vol. 1, Orgel on Valuation 2d, § 148; State Highway Comm’n v. Fisch-Or., Inc., 241 Or. 412 , 399 P.2d 1011 , 406 P.2d 539 (1965); State By & Through State Highway Comm’n v.

Gibson v. Walden University, LLC

66 F. Supp. 3d 1322 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2014

In Carr v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. … Sept. 19, 2013) (finding that university handbooks and catalogs do not form a contract when the terms are not binding on the university); Brown v.