Case law

Castillo v. Bush

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 15, 2024

Another bloody 13-inch kitchen knife—this one with a stainless-steel handle—was found behind the brown recliner in the living room. Id. … For example, in Larez v.

Werthy v. Astrue

882 F. Supp. 2d 1202 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 3, 2011

Brown noted “this might be possible.” (Id.) … He is board certified in internal medicine. He has never examined Werthy, but he has reviewed all the medical evidence of record.

Pacific Lanes, Inc. v. Bowling Proprietors Ass'n of America, Inc.

248 F. Supp. 347 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 23, 1965

Its board of directors consists of 200 persons, one of whom is Ruecker. He is not one of the persons named for service in Rule 4(d)(3), F.R. … Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 34 Okl. 149 , 125 P. 734 (1912); Bennett v. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co., 201 Iowa 770 , 208 N.W. 519 (1926).

In re Morris Bros.

282 F. 670 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 3, 1922

To a like purpose, see Schuyler v. Littlefield, Trustee of Brown & Co., 232 U. S. 707 , 34 Sup. Ct. 466, 58 L. Ed. 806 , and In re See, 209 Fed. 172 , 126 C. C. A. 120 . … See, also, Wallace v. Bacon (C. C.) 86 Fed. 553 , and Lantry v. Wallace, 97 Fed. 865 , 38 C. C. A. 510 .

United States v. Martyniuk

395 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 19, 1975

Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968); James v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 314 , 418 F.2d 1150 (1969). … Jones v. U. S., supra 362 U.S. at 261-262 , 80 S.Ct. 725 . In Brown v. U. S., 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.

Jackson v. United States National Bank, Portland, Ore.

153 F. Supp. 104 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 1, 1957

Barnesly v. Powel, 1 Ves.Sen. 284, 27 Eng.Rep. 1034 (Ch. 1749); Bennet v. Vade, 2 Atk. 324, 26 Eng.Rep. 597 (Ch.1742); Kerrich v. Bransby, 7 Brown’s P.C. 437, 3 Eng. … Werts, 1890, 19 Or. 122 , 23 P. 850 ; Chrisman v. Chrisman, 1888, 16 Or. 127 , 18 P. 6 ; Clark’s Heirs v. Ellis, 1881, 9 Or. 128, 132 ; Brown v. Brown, 1879, 7 Or. 285, 286, 299-300 ; Greenwood v.

Bell v. Nihonkai Kisen, K. K., Tokyo

204 F. Supp. 230 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 26, 1962

The band was utilized by the stevedore instead of a sling *234 or pallet board in performing an obligation of the ship, the discharge of the cargo therefrom. … The result is no different than the stevedore having supplied a defective pallet board, as in Reed v. The Yaka (E.D.Pa.), 183 F.Supp. 69 ; or a defective tong as in Massa v. C. A. Venezuelan Navigacion (C.A.2), 1962 A.

Newcomb

District Court, D. Oregon · May 18, 2026

Baldwin v. Reese, 541 U.S. 27, 29 (2004) (simplified). … Edwards v. Carpenter, 529 U.S. 446, 453 (2000).

Crane v. Pacific Steamship Co.

272 F. 204 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 14, 1921

It was decided adversely to defendant’s position by Judge Wolverton in Williams v. Shipping Board et al. (no opinion filed) on July 23, 1920, and his conclusion is supported by the authorities. … And in Knapp et al. v. McCaffrey, 177 U. S. 638 , 20 Sup. Ct. 824, 44 L.

Gessele v. Jack In The Box Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 27, 2021

Plaintiffs assert the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Kaiser v. Cascade Cap., LLC, 989 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2021), indicates Judge Brown erred when she concluded Maza v. Waterford Operations LLC, 300 Or. … Similarly, in Wren v.

Russell v. Peterson

498 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 23, 1980

United States v. Heard, 18 IBLA 43 (1974); United States v. Taylor, 8 IBLA 364 (1972). … United States v. Whitenack, 1 IBLA 156 (1970).

Shaver v. Pacific Coast Condensed Milk Co.

185 F. 316 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 27, 1911

. & P. v. Stepp (C. C.) 151 Fed. 908 ; Gustafson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. (C. C.) 128 Fed. 85 ; Helms v. N. P. Ry. (C. C.) 120 Fed. 389 . … Justice Miller, in Board of Co. Com. v. K. & P. Ry., 4 Dill. 277 , Fed. Cas.

Schroeder v. Hegstrom

590 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 13, 1984

Both Garrett and Walsh involved across-the-board changes in benefits based on changes in state or federal law. … The court noted: [T]he notices involved an across-the-board reduction in welfare benefit mandated by statutory change.

United States v. North

184 F. 151 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 9, 1911

Eater in the opinion the court quotes from the case of Doe v. … Chief Justice Fuller, in the case of Hickory v.

Bassine v. Hill

450 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 27, 2006

ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Petitioner, an inmate at the Snake River Correctional Institution, brings this habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . … See United States v.

Board of Trustees of the Western States Office and Professional Employees Pension Fund v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 483

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 11, 2020

Employers seek to draw an analogy between this case and Board of Trustees of IBT Local 863 Pension Fund v. C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc., 802 F.3d 534 (3d Cir. 2015). … Corley v. United States, 556 U.S. 303, 314 (2009) (quoting Hibbs v. Winn, 542 U.S. 88, 101 (2004)).

QSIndustries, Inc. v. Mike's Train House, Inc.

230 F. Supp. 2d 1240 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 7, 2002

See Sage Products v. … See Markman v.

Too Marker Products, Inc. v. Creation Supply, Inc.

911 F. Supp. 2d 1114 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 28, 2012

BROWN, District Judge. … Plaintiffs rely on Mantia v.

Barrett v. Waldbauer

32 F. Supp. 2d 1222 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 12, 1998

Kanne v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co., 867 F.2d 489, 492 (9th Cir.1988); and Credit Managers Ass’n of S. Cal. v. Kennesaw Life and Accident Ins. Co., 809 F.2d 617, 625 (9th Cir.1987). … Id. at 237 , referencing Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 12, 107 S.Ct. 2211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987).

Brotherhood Co-Op. Nat. Bank v. Hurlburt

26 F.2d 957 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 1928

Bank v. Fairweather, 263 U. S. 103 , 44 S. Ct. 23 , 68 L. Ed. 191 ; Brotherhood Nat. Bank v. Hurlburt (D. C.) 21 F.(2d) 85 . … Bank v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 348 , 46 S. Ct. 138 , 70 L. Ed. 295 . Or, as said by the court in Bank v.