Case law

Ross

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 14, 2026

.”); see also United States v. Brown, 720 F. Supp. 3d 1020, 1026 (D. Or. 2024) (“Generally, district courts in the Ninth Circuit are bound by the prior decisions of the Court of Appeals.”) (simplified); Jefferson v. … The Ninth Circuit has already held that Governor Brown is entitled to immunity under the PREP Act for “vaccine prioritization damages claim[s.]” Maney, 91 F.4th at 1303; see also Paschall v.

In re Western Transportation Co.

194 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 25, 1961

See also, Deep Sea Tankers v. The Long Branch, 2 Cir., 1958, 258 F.2d 757 . A similar case is The Erie Lighter 108, D.C.N.J.1918, 250 F. 490, 497 . … In Standard Dredging Co. v. Kristiansen, 2 Cir., 1933, 67 F.2d 548, 549 , the court, after discussing Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Nav. Co. v.

Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. Gehlar

9 F. Supp. 341 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 21, 1934

Price v. People of State of Illinois, 238 U. S. 447 , 35 S. Ct. 892 , 59 L. Ed. 1400 ; Hebe Co. v. Shaw, 248 U. S. 297 , 39 S. Ct. 125 , 63 L. Ed. 255 ; Radice v. People of State of New York, 264 U. S. 292 , 44 S. … The question when the paramount power of congress terminates and that of the state begins came directly before the Supreme Court of the United States for the first time in the case of Brown v.

Slockish v. United States Federal Highway Administration

682 F. Supp. 2d 1178 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 27, 2010

ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. … See Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 744-45 (9th Cir.2002). See also United States v.

Jensen v. Garvison

274 F. Supp. 866 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 8, 1967

Garvison, 241 F.Supp. 523 (D.Or. 1965) and Judge Browning’s opinion in *868 the Court of Appeals, Garvison v. Jensen, 355 F.2d 487 (9th Cir. 1966). … Blassie v.

Gessele v. Jack In The Box Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 1, 2021

Marlo v. … V.

In re Lea

126 F. 231 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 26, 1903

The Circuit Court of Appeals for this Circuit, in United States v. Yamasaka, 100 Fed. 406 , 40 C. C. … But upon the authority of the United States v. Yamasaka, 100 Fed. 406 , 40 C. C. A. 454 , and In re Lifieri (D. C.) 52 Fed. 293 , he may exercise that authority by approving what has been done.

Griffin v. Asla

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 14, 2022

See Imbler v. … Cameron v.

United States v. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co.

179 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 4, 1959

Defendant contends that under the decisions of Jamison v. Repetti, 9 Cir., 1956, 239 F.2d 901 ; Maxwell v. Campbell, 5 Cir., 1953, 205 F.2d 461 ; Gran-quist v. Hackleman, 9 Cir., 1959, 264 F.2d 9 ; and United States v. … United States v. Failla, 3 Cir., 1955, 219 F.2d 212 ; United *436 States v. Wurts, 303 U.S. 414, 416 , 58 S.Ct. 637 , 82 L.Ed. 932 ; Title 26, § 7405(b), U.S.C.A.

United States v. Oregon State Bar

405 F. Supp. 1102 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 20, 1975

S. v. Oregon State Bar, 385 F.Supp. 507 (D.Or.1974). Promptly thereafter, on December 13, 1974, the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar passed a resolution withdrawing and canceling the suggested fee schedule. … DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 , 94 S.Ct. 1704 , 40 L.Ed.2d 164 (1974).

Multnomah Legal Services Workers Union v. Multnomah County Legal Aid Service, Inc.

723 F. Supp. 1398 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 6, 1989

Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co., 302 Or. 616, 622 , 733 P.2d 430 (1987). 1. … LSC cites National Clients Council, Inc. v. LSC, 617 F.Supp. 480, 489-90 (D.D.C.1985).

Samson v. Peters

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 7, 2024

Defendant Brown appealed the circuit court ruling, but the Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling in Samson v. Brown, 310 Or. App. 319 (2021). … Dist. v.

Societe De Developments Et D'Innovations Des Marches Agricolesimentaires-SODIMA-Union De Cooperatives Agricoles v. International Yogurt Co.

662 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 15, 1987

The Appeal Board held that it will not cancel a mark because of a mere change of formulae or primary use. Similarly, in E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. G.C. … Similarly in CPC International, Inc. v. Seven-Up Co., 218 U.S.P.Q. 379 , 381 (T.T.A.B.1983), the Appeal Board found that the applicant had no definite plans to use the mark for a specific product.

Birrer v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana

386 F. Supp. 1105 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 13, 1974

In Beeler v. … Co. v.

United States v. Dairy Co-Op. Ass'n

49 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 28, 1943

. § 151 et seq., which created the National Labor Relations Board, was also the product of the early judges’ hostility to the liberalizing provisions of the Clayton Act. 1 Extremes beget extremes. … Marcus v. Hess et al., 63 S.Ct. 379 , 87 L.Ed. —.

States Steamship Co. v. Portland Stevedoring Co.

216 F. Supp. 934 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 28, 1963

It seems the respondent agreed to perform stevedoring services on board a vessel owned by the libelant, pursuant to the terms and provisions of a written steve-doring contract dated August 1, 1955. … Citing D’Agosta v. Royal Netherlands Steamship Co., 2 Cir., 301 F.2d 105 .

Griffith v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Griffith)

47 B.R. 416 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 15, 1985

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Vogel, 437 F.Supp. 660, 663 (E.D.Wis.1977). … See, e.g., Black v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 640 F.2d 699 (5th Cir.) (Unit B), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 838 , 102 S.Ct. 143 , 70 L.Ed.2d 119 (1981).

Dowell v. Applegate

15 F. 419 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 5, 1883

Ch. 507 ; Clayton v. Brown, 17 Ga. 217 ; Mixell v. Lutz, 34 Ill. 382 ; Miller v. Thompson, 3 Port. (Ala.) 198; Gardner v. Booth *426 Lutz, 34 Ill. 382 ; Miller v. Thompson, 3 Port. (Ala.) 198; Gardner v. … Booth, 31 Ala. 186 ; Benton v. Jones, 8 Conn. 186 ; Clayton v. Brown, 17 Ga. 217 ; Shepard v. Iverson, 12 Ala. 97 ; Parish v. Murphee, 13 How. 92 ; Jones v. Slubey, 5 Har. & J. 372 ; Kissen v. Edmundson, 1 Ired. (N.

Bueno v. Juras

349 F. Supp. 91 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 24, 1972

Ness Produce Company v. Short, 263 F.Supp. 586 (D.C.Or.1966) affirmed per curiam 385 U. S. 537 , 87 S.Ct. 742 , 17 L.Ed.2d 591 (1967). … Woolfolk v. Brown, 325 F.Supp. 1162 (E.D.Va.1971), aff’d, 456 F.2d 652 , (4th Cir., 1972).

Grand Union Tea Co. v. Evans

216 F. 791 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 17, 1914

See, also, Adams Express Co. v. N. Y., 232 U. S. 14 , 34 Sup. Ct. 203, 58 L. … Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16 , 34 Sup. Ct. 578, 58 L. Ed. 828 , decided April 6, 1914.