Case law

Bong

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 30, 2025

Bong v. Brown, No. 23-cv-00417, ECF No. 1. Defendant Mersereau is counsel for the defendants in that case, too. See, e.g., Bong v. Brown, No. 23-cv-00417, ECF No. 32. … Brown, No. 23-cv-417, ECF Nos. 225, 228, 232–33.

Portland Audubon Society v. Lujan

795 F. Supp. 1489 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 8, 1992

In Marsh v. … Co. v.

Leaco Enterprises, Inc. v. General Electric Co.

737 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 7, 1990

Sorosky v. Burroughs Corp., 826 F.2d 794, 798 (9th Cir.1987). … Straube v. Larson, 287 Or. 357, 361 , 600 P.2d 371 (1979); Top Serv. Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 283 Or. 201, 209-10 , 582 P.2d 1365 (1978).

McDaniel v. United States Bakery

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 29, 2025

On January 19, 2024, the Joint Conference Board ("JCB"), the arbitral board designated to adjudicate grievances under the CBA, issued a decision in defendant's favor regarding plaintiff's union grievance. … (citing Brown v. City of Portland, 80 Or. App. 464, 722 P.2d 1282, 1286 (1986)).

Harrington v. City of Portland

698 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 8, 1988

United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725 , 86 S.Ct. 1130, 1138 , 16 L.Ed.2d 213 (1966); accord In re Nucorp Energy Securities Litigation, 772 F.2d 1486 (9th Cir.1985). … See, e.g., Burrell v. City of Portland, 61 Or. 105, 111 , 121 P. 1 (1912), and Kantor v.

Allen v. G.D. Searle & Co.

708 F. Supp. 1142 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 3, 1989

Michigan Canners and Freezers Ass’n v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Board, 467 U.S. 461, 469 , 104 S.Ct. 2518, 2523 , 81 L.Ed.2d 399 (1984). Searle argues that all three types of preemption apply in this case. … However, it appears that if California law applies to Keys’ claims, the recent decision of the California Supreme Court in Brown v.

Chemical Bank v. CITY OF BANDON, Or.

562 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 30, 1983

Sederquist v. City of Tiburon, 590 F.2d 278, 280 (9th Cir.1978), quoting County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co., 360 U.S. 185, 189 , 79 S.Ct. 1060, 1063 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1163 (1959), and Martin v. … The consideration which is determinative here is the existence of claims against individual utility board members in their personal capacity, and against their counsel.

Sornson v. Oregon Commission on Children

887 F. Supp. 2d 1111 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 13, 2012

See Miles v. Cal., 320 F.3d 986, 988 (9th Cir.2003); Hill v. Blind Indus. *1116 and Serv. of Md., 179 F.3d 754, 762 (9th Cir.1999). … ORS 182.466 states that “a board may ... [s]ue and be sued in its own name”, and defines “board” as a “semi-independent state agency listed in ORS 182.454.” ORS 182.466(1); see also ORS 182.456.

Elwert v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

138 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 31, 1956

For authority, see Ganoe v. … Also Marchand v.

Ingersoll v. Carter Jones Collection Service, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 21, 2023

Plaintiff has also filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority, ECF No. 46, in which he argues that the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Brown v. Transworld Sys. … Brown, 73 F.3d at 1042.

Sherrod v. Hegstrom

629 F. Supp. 150 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 22, 1985

Schweiker v. … Brown v. Heckler, 589 F.Supp. 985 (E.D.Pa.1984) (AFDC provision deeming the income of stepparent available to the family unit upheld).

The Hermine

12 F. Cas. 24 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 18, 1874

Upon this point counsel for libellants cite Snow v. … Upon this point counsel cites The Napoleon [Case No. 10,015]; Graham v. Hoskins [Id. 5,669]; Davis v. Leslie [Id. 3,639]; The Infanta [supra]; Bucker v. Klorkgeter [Id. 2,083].

Werby v. Legore

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 29, 2021

Clement v. … See Walsh v. Peters, 2:15-cv-01012-MO.

The Brand

29 F.2d 792 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 8, 1928

PIPER v. KNUDSEN. No. 10272. District Court, D. Oregon. October 8, 1928. Lord & Moulton, of Portland, Or., for libelant. Erskine Wood, Gunther F. … To the same effect is Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 963 . The leading case relied upon by counsel for the libelant is The Aurora (D. C.) 163 F. 633 ; Id. (D.

International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc.

932 F. Supp. 2d 1181 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 15, 2013

. v. … See Connex, 641 F.2d at 94 (“While the court owes no particular deference to the Board’s antitrust views, its own views on the reach of the antitrust laws cannot but be enlightened by the Board’s opinion” on the scope of

United States v. De Maurez

54 F. Supp. 102 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 12, 1943

DeMaurez v. Squier, 9 Cir., 121 F.2d 960 . … DeMaurez v. Squier, 121 F.2d 960, 961 .

Barton v. City of Portland

242 F. Supp. 2d 893 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 27, 2002

See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) (citing cases involving termination of public employment). … Brewster v. Board of Educ. of Lynwood Unified Sch. Dist., 149 F.3d 971 , 986 (9th Cir.1998), cert denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1252 , 143 L.Ed.2d 349 (1999) (citation omitted).

Mead v. Gordon

583 F. Supp. 2d 1231 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 3, 2008

Long v. … The Board’s exclusion policy is viewpoint neutral on its face.

United States v. Soroka

508 F. Supp. 2d 869 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 30, 2007

Specifically, Soroka asserted pursuant to United States v. … Compare, United States v.

Oregon Round Lumber Co. v. Portland & Asiatic S. S. Co.

162 F. 912 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 25, 1908

The court quotes, as authoritative, from Dupont De Nemours v. Vance, 19 How. 162 , 16 L. … Chief Justice Rord, in Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 315 , 33 Pac. 557 , that: “In accepting the service, he [The employe!