Case law

Woods v. Beneficial Finance Co. of Eugene

395 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 1975

The Court in Kenny v. … . *16 Pugh v. Am.

Spano v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of America

215 F.R.D. 601 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 21, 2003

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … The SAFECO Property and Casualty Insurance Companies are independent companies with separate boards of directors. Each company holds separate board meetings and keeps separate books and minutes of those meetings.

The Bee

216 F. 709 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 31, 1914

Gynther v. Brown & McCabe, 67 Or. 311 , 134 Pac. 1186 ; Dunn v. … Co. v. Lindstrom, 123 Fed. 475 , 60 C. C.

The Samson

197 F. 1017 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 15, 1912

the entire controversy in one proceeding where it can be *1019 done without injury to the rights of either party, I am constrained to believe that the better doctrine is that stated by that eminent admiralty lawver, Judge Brown … of the Southern District of New York, in Joice v.

The Glaramara

10 F. 678 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 28, 1882

In support of this proposition and argument, counsel cites Steam-ship Co. v. Joliffe, 2 Wall. 456 ; Wilson v. McNamee, 102 U. S. 572 ; Horton v. Smith, 6 Ben. 264 ; The Traveler, Id. 280; The Georgia D. … But it may be that this act of 1870 is invalid even under the doctrine of the supreme court as announced in Fleischner v. Chadwick, 5 Or. 153 ; Grant Co. v. Sels , Id. 243 ; Doland v. Barnard, Id. 391 .

American Dental Industries, Inc. v. Eax Worldwide, Inc.

228 F. Supp. 2d 1155 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 29, 2002

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Remand of Action to State Court (# 9). … See, e.g., Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 230 F.3d 868, 871 (6th Cir.2000); Poore v. American-Amicable Life Ins.

Mounce v. Vitt

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 4, 2024

Starr v. … See Complaint, Maney, et al. v. Brown et al, No. 6:20-CV-00570-SB (D. Or.

E. J. Dodge Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Portland

260 F. 758 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 25, 1917

Bank of San Luis Obispo v. Wickersham, 99 Cal. 655, 661 , 34 Pac. 444 . … Vercoutore v. Golden State Land Co., 116 Cal. 410 , 48 Pac. 375 .

United States v. Mitchell

141 F. 666 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 11, 1905

Brown, Mrs. Nellie Brown, Henry A. Young, Prank H. Walgamot, Clark. E. Loomis, and Salmon B. … C.) 74 Fed. 619 ; United States v. Nathan (D. C.) 61 Fed. 936 ; Blake v. United States, 71 Fed. 286 , 18 C. C. A. 117 .

Martyr v. Mazur-Hart

789 F. Supp. 1081 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 13, 1992

See Benning v. Board of Regents of Regency Univs., 928 F.2d 775 , 778 (7th Cir.1991) (Pennhurst bars claims for declaratory as well as injunctive relief). … board); Pitts v.

The Ruth

178 F. 749 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 4, 1910

C.) 30 Fed. 283 ; Forsyth v. Schooner Brandreth (D. C.) 3 Fed. 414 . This the Ruth did not do or attempt to do. … Day et al. v. H. W. Hills (D. C.) 21 Fed. 727 ; The Atlas, 93 U. S. 303 , 23 L. Ed. 863 .

Carey v. United Airlines, Inc.

77 F. Supp. 2d 1165 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 8, 1999

In El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tseng, 525 U.S. 155, 119 S.Ct. 662 , 142 L.Ed.2d 576 (1999), the plaintiff was subjected to an extended search of her person before being allowed to board the plane. … In Chendrimada v.

Lethin v. United States

583 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 28, 1984

State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel, 283 Or. 147,161 , 582 P.2d 1352 (1978). Accretion is “a process of gradual and imperceptible additions of alluvial materials to lands bordering on a body of water.” … The upland owner in State Land Board v. Sause, 217 Or. 52 , 342 P.2d 803 (1959), disputed the state’s claim to tideland area created by his dredging to construct a log dump.

Mankins Family LLC v. Tillamook County Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 7, 2020

See Engquist v. … See Samson v.

Jurgens v. Columbia County

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 4, 2023

Pistor v. Garcia, 791 F.3d 1104, 1111 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation omitted). … City of Chicago v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 172 (1997). “A Rule 12(b)(1) jurisdictional attack may be facial or factual.” Safe Air for Everyone v.

The Peru

91 F. 426 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 24, 1898

The tug did not change her course until the schooner was v. to her, or nearly so. The ship struck the schooner on the port side, and sunk her. … The schooner’s lights were burning brightly, but were not seen by those on board the tug or ship.

Davis v. Con-Way Freight Inc.

139 F. Supp. 3d 1224 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 4, 2015

Plaintiff read a written statement to the Board, presenting his side of the story. Id. … Examples of . the first category include discharge for filing a worker’s compensation claim, Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or. 597 , 588 P.2d 1087 (1978), and resisting sexual harassment by a supervisor, Holien v.

Turkoly v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 20, 2023

Est. of Barton v. ADT Sec. Servs. … Muniz v. Amec Const.

Jefferson v. Ashley

643 F. Supp. 227 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 8, 1986

In Loehr v. … In Gentile v.

United States v. Smith

685 F. Supp. 1523 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 4, 1988

Woodrow Brown identified Benjamin and testified that he met Benjamin in Alabama in 1983. Benjamin was dropped off at their first meeting by a woman Mr. Brown identified as Constance. … United States v.