Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersord

3,469 results

0.82s

  • White v. Nooth

    322 F. Supp. 3d 1077 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 11, 2018

    Brown , 297 Or. 404 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984), and State v. … Thus, the Court held, medical diagnoses of child sexual abuse "must be subjected to the foundational requirements of [ State v. Brown , 297 Or. 404 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984) ] and [ State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grumbling v. Medallion Insurance Company

    392 F. Supp. 717 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 8, 1975

    The parties agree that the governing Oregon law stems from Radcliffe v. Franklin National Insurance Company, 208 Or. 1 , 298 P.2d 1002 (1956) and Groce v. … This letter was transmitted by Adjuster Brown to defendant’s Portland office on June 28, 1973.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Dean

    949 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 11, 1996

    United States v. Real Property Located in El Dorado County, 59 F.3d 974 (9th Cir.1995); see also Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. … Browning-Ferris, 492 U.S. at 266 , 109 S.Ct. at 2915 . Few cases address application of the Eighth Amendment to an order of criminal restitution. In United States v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Columbia River Chapter of Pacific Log Scalers Ass'n

    386 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 15, 1972

    There the Board held that the situs of a labor dispute may be other than the premises of the primary employer. … Neither NLRB v. Building Service Employees, 367 F.2d 227 (10th Cir. 1966), nor Broadcast Employees Local 25 (Taft Broadcasting Co.), 194 NLRB No. 11 , 78 L.R.R.M. 1647 (1971), are in point.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Seehausen v. Van Buren

    243 F. Supp. 2d 1165 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 20, 2002

    Ruviwat v. Smith, 701 F.2d 844, 845 (9th Cir.1983). … Brown, 895 F.2d at 535 . Nigro does not dictate a contrary result.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Balfour v. Wilkins

    2 F. Cas. 539 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 11, 1879

    Andrews v. Pond, 13 Pet. [38 U. S.] 77; Naylor v. Ballzell, [Case No. 10,061;] Story, Confl. Laws, § 280. … Raymond v. Tyson, [17 How. (58 U. S.) 59.]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnson ex rel. Grandys v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc.

    766 F. Supp. 1554 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 1, 1991

    Heaton v. Ford Motor Co., 248 Or. 467, 471 , 435 P.2d 806 (1967). … Deposition of Jock Scott Brown, p. 27, Ins. 10-14.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Orchard View Farms, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc.

    500 F. Supp. 984 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 28, 1980

    In McElwain v. … In Davis v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vanegas v. Smith

    179 F. Supp. 2d 1205 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 24, 2001

    See Castro-Cortez v. INS, 239 F.3d 1037 , 1042 (9th Cir.2001) (“the government no longer permits aliens subject to reinstatement to appear before an IJ or appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals”). … Gall o-Alvarez v. Ashcroft, 266 F.3d 1123, 1129 n. 3 (9th Cir.2001).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robertson v. Kulongoski

    359 F. Supp. 2d 1094 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 19, 2004

    Defendants are the Governor of Oregon and the members of the Public Employees Retirement Board (“PERB”) in their official capacity. … See Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass’n v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nicholas v. Snake River Correctional Facility

    District Court, D. Oregon · May 12, 2022

    Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 405-06 (2000). … Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985); see Strickland v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. Smith

    396 F. Supp. 367 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 9, 1973

    Monroe v. Board of Commissioners, 453 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2045 , 32 L.Ed.2d 333 ; Hammond v. Housing Authority, 328 F.Supp. 586 (D.Or.1971). … Accord, Cross v. Board of Supervisors, 326 F.Supp. 634 (N.D.Cal. 1968), aff’d, 442 F.2d 362 (9th Cir. 1971).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Public Utility Commissioner v. Bonneville Power Administration

    583 F. Supp. 752 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 21, 1984

    The Ninth Circuit has observed that the Northwest Power Act’s “unusual judicial review provisions,” Forelaws on Board v. … National Wildlife Federation v. Johnson, 548 F.Supp. 708, 710 (D.Or.1982), aff'd sub nom. Forelaws on Board v. Johnson, 709 F.2d 1310 (9th Cir.1983).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jacobsen v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.

    201 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 13, 1961

    Federal courts cannot, intervene in matters expressly placed, within the competence of the Board except by way of review or on application-of the Board. Garner v. … Cases such as Springer v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • MacDonald v. Oregon Health & Science University

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 28, 2023

    In August 2021, Oregon Governor Kate Brown issued an executive order (“Vaccine Mandate” or “Mandate”) requiring healthcare workers to be vaccinated against COVID-19 by October 18, 2021. … In support of this statement, Defendants cite three cases: Williams v. Brown, 567 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Reddye v. City of Astoria

    District Court, D. Oregon · May 30, 2025

    v. … Board of Education].” Stanley v. Univ. of S. Cal., 178 F.3d 1069, 1080 (9th Cir. 1999); see also Lowry v. City of San Diego, 11-CV-946- MMA(WMC), 2013 WL 12209819, at *2 n.2 (S.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jurgens v. Columbia County

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 20, 2025

    S.E.C. v. … Brown’s alcoholism. Pl. Am. Resp. to County MSJ, ECF 87 at 10. But such “speculation does not create a factual dispute.” Witherow v. Paff, 52 F.3d 264, 266 (9th Cir. 1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoge v. Kast

    District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 27, 2020

    Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). … Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • The Live Yankee

    15 F. Cas. 656 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 20, 1868

    Seller v. The Pacific [Case No. 12,644]. As to the latter de-fence, the evidence fails altogether. … This is manifest from the position of the brand, “M & V., Portland,” which I suppose vas put on the casks just before they were shipped.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Canales-Robles v. Peters

    270 F. Supp. 3d 1230 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 3, 2017

    Id. at *4-5 (citing Burd v. Sessler, 702 F.3d 429 (7th Cir. 2012), and Hoard v. Reddy, 175 F.3d 531 (7th Cir. 1999)). Judge Brown followed the weight of authority and dismissed the plaintiffs claim. … Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 1540, 1549 , 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016). Accordingly, the persuasiveness of Burd and Hoard , which Judge Brown found compelling when she decided Koch , is less so now.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.