Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
0.82s
322 F. Supp. 3d 1077 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 11, 2018
Brown , 297 Or. 404 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984), and State v. … Thus, the Court held, medical diagnoses of child sexual abuse "must be subjected to the foundational requirements of [ State v. Brown , 297 Or. 404 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984) ] and [ State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGrumbling v. Medallion Insurance Company
392 F. Supp. 717 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 8, 1975
The parties agree that the governing Oregon law stems from Radcliffe v. Franklin National Insurance Company, 208 Or. 1 , 298 P.2d 1002 (1956) and Groce v. … This letter was transmitted by Adjuster Brown to defendant’s Portland office on June 28, 1973.
Cited 7 timesPublished949 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 11, 1996
United States v. Real Property Located in El Dorado County, 59 F.3d 974 (9th Cir.1995); see also Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. … Browning-Ferris, 492 U.S. at 266 , 109 S.Ct. at 2915 . Few cases address application of the Eighth Amendment to an order of criminal restitution. In United States v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedGeorgia-Pacific Corp. v. Columbia River Chapter of Pacific Log Scalers Ass'n
386 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 15, 1972
There the Board held that the situs of a labor dispute may be other than the premises of the primary employer. … Neither NLRB v. Building Service Employees, 367 F.2d 227 (10th Cir. 1966), nor Broadcast Employees Local 25 (Taft Broadcasting Co.), 194 NLRB No. 11 , 78 L.R.R.M. 1647 (1971), are in point.
Cited 2 timesPublished243 F. Supp. 2d 1165 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 20, 2002
Ruviwat v. Smith, 701 F.2d 844, 845 (9th Cir.1983). … Brown, 895 F.2d at 535 . Nigro does not dictate a contrary result.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 F. Cas. 539 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 11, 1879
Andrews v. Pond, 13 Pet. [38 U. S.] 77; Naylor v. Ballzell, [Case No. 10,061;] Story, Confl. Laws, § 280. … Raymond v. Tyson, [17 How. (58 U. S.) 59.]
Cited 2 timesPublishedJohnson ex rel. Grandys v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc.
766 F. Supp. 1554 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 1, 1991
Heaton v. Ford Motor Co., 248 Or. 467, 471 , 435 P.2d 806 (1967). … Deposition of Jock Scott Brown, p. 27, Ins. 10-14.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOrchard View Farms, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc.
500 F. Supp. 984 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 28, 1980
In McElwain v. … In Davis v.
Cited 3 timesPublished179 F. Supp. 2d 1205 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 24, 2001
See Castro-Cortez v. INS, 239 F.3d 1037 , 1042 (9th Cir.2001) (“the government no longer permits aliens subject to reinstatement to appear before an IJ or appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals”). … Gall o-Alvarez v. Ashcroft, 266 F.3d 1123, 1129 n. 3 (9th Cir.2001).
Cited 1 timesPublished359 F. Supp. 2d 1094 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 19, 2004
Defendants are the Governor of Oregon and the members of the Public Employees Retirement Board (“PERB”) in their official capacity. … See Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass’n v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNicholas v. Snake River Correctional Facility
District Court, D. Oregon · May 12, 2022
Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 405-06 (2000). … Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985); see Strickland v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown396 F. Supp. 367 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 9, 1973
Monroe v. Board of Commissioners, 453 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2045 , 32 L.Ed.2d 333 ; Hammond v. Housing Authority, 328 F.Supp. 586 (D.Or.1971). … Accord, Cross v. Board of Supervisors, 326 F.Supp. 634 (N.D.Cal. 1968), aff’d, 442 F.2d 362 (9th Cir. 1971).
Cited 3 timesPublishedPublic Utility Commissioner v. Bonneville Power Administration
583 F. Supp. 752 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 21, 1984
The Ninth Circuit has observed that the Northwest Power Act’s “unusual judicial review provisions,” Forelaws on Board v. … National Wildlife Federation v. Johnson, 548 F.Supp. 708, 710 (D.Or.1982), aff'd sub nom. Forelaws on Board v. Johnson, 709 F.2d 1310 (9th Cir.1983).
Cited 9 timesPublishedJacobsen v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.
201 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 13, 1961
Federal courts cannot, intervene in matters expressly placed, within the competence of the Board except by way of review or on application-of the Board. Garner v. … Cases such as Springer v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMacDonald v. Oregon Health & Science University
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 28, 2023
In August 2021, Oregon Governor Kate Brown issued an executive order (“Vaccine Mandate” or “Mandate”) requiring healthcare workers to be vaccinated against COVID-19 by October 18, 2021. … In support of this statement, Defendants cite three cases: Williams v. Brown, 567 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · May 30, 2025
v. … Board of Education].” Stanley v. Univ. of S. Cal., 178 F.3d 1069, 1080 (9th Cir. 1999); see also Lowry v. City of San Diego, 11-CV-946- MMA(WMC), 2013 WL 12209819, at *2 n.2 (S.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Feb 20, 2025
S.E.C. v. … Brown’s alcoholism. Pl. Am. Resp. to County MSJ, ECF 87 at 10. But such “speculation does not create a factual dispute.” Witherow v. Paff, 52 F.3d 264, 266 (9th Cir. 1995).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Oct 27, 2020
Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). … Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691.
Cited 0 timesUnknown15 F. Cas. 656 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 20, 1868
Seller v. The Pacific [Case No. 12,644]. As to the latter de-fence, the evidence fails altogether. … This is manifest from the position of the brand, “M & V., Portland,” which I suppose vas put on the casks just before they were shipped.
Cited 0 timesPublished270 F. Supp. 3d 1230 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 3, 2017
Id. at *4-5 (citing Burd v. Sessler, 702 F.3d 429 (7th Cir. 2012), and Hoard v. Reddy, 175 F.3d 531 (7th Cir. 1999)). Judge Brown followed the weight of authority and dismissed the plaintiffs claim. … Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 1540, 1549 , 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016). Accordingly, the persuasiveness of Burd and Hoard , which Judge Brown found compelling when she decided Koch , is less so now.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna