Case law

Must Hatch Incubator Co. v. Patterson

32 F.2d 714 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 27, 1927

No state board or official exists in the state of California, authorized by law to carry on the tests or issue the certificates required by the regulations of the state live stock sanitary board of the state of Oregon.” … Co. v. Husen, 95 U. S. 465 , 24 L. Ed. 527 ; Missouri, Kansas & Texas R. Co. v. Haber, 169 U. S. 613 , 18 S. Ct. 488 , 42 L. Ed. 878 ; Town of Greensboro v. Ehrenreich, 80 Ala. 579 , 2 So. 725 , 60 Am.

Hull v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 5, 2024

Robbins v. Soc. Sec. … Id.; see also Woods v.

Pratt v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance

285 B.R. 3 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 7, 2001

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … Sears, Roebuck and Co., 298 Or. 76 , 689 P.2d 1292 (1984), and for filing a workers’ compensation claim, Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or. 597 , 588 P.2d 1087 (1978).

Kay v. North Lincoln Hospital District

555 F. Supp. 527 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 5, 1982

See Garris v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 *530 S.Ct. 2701, 2709, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Such a property interest is then entitled to constitutional protection. The Oregon Supreme Court in Yartzoff v.

Western Transportation Co. v. Wilhelmsen

376 F. Supp. 530 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 9, 1974

Shamrock Towing Co. v. Tully & DiNapoli, 91 F.Supp. 239 (E.D.N.Y., 1950), aff’d, 187 F.2d 872 (2nd Cir., 1951). . O’Donnell Transp. Co. v. M. & J. Tracy, 150 F.2d 735 (2nd Cir., 1945). . White v. … Co. v. M. & J. Tracy, supra note 4 . See: Shamrock Towing Co. v. Tully & DiNapoli, supra note 3. . See: Shamrock Towing Co. vs. Tully & DiNapoli, supra note 3.

The Cascades

178 F. 726 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 18, 1910

United Slates v. Port of Portland (D. C.) 161 Fed. 193 . This rule, read in connection with article 16 of the same act ( 30 Stat. 99 [U. S. Comp. … Justice Brown -has said, in the case of The Umbria, 166 U. S. 404, 417 , 17 Sup. Ct. 610, 615 ( 41 L.

Foraker v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 20, 2020

See Morrow v. Red Shield Ins. Co., 212 Or. … Zehr v. Haugen, 318 Or. 647, 658 (1994).

JEREMY CONKLIN, D.O. v. OREGON MEDICAL BOARD, an Oregon State Agency; NICOLE KRISHNASWAMI; MICHAEL SEIDEL; and WALTER FRASIER

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 23, 2026

See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 436 (2009). … Oregon Medical Board, et al., 3:25-cv-01173-AR

Miller v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 18, 2020

Brown v. Boise-Cascade Corp. 150 Or. App. 391, 408 (1997). … Dean v.

Anderson

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 2, 2026

State v. Giles, 254 Or App 345 (2012). … Nelson v.

The Ullock

19 F. 207 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 7, 1884

Com. v. Ricketson, 5 Metc. 412 ; 2 Pars. Shipp. & Adm. 109. … The ruling in Hepburn v. Ellzey, supra, was afterwards applied in New Orleans v.

Marshall v. Gordon Trucking, Inc.

215 F. Supp. 3d 1036 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 17, 2016

In Brown v. … Brown v. MCI World-Com Network Servs., Inc., 277 F.3d 1166 , 1173 (9th Cir. 2002).

Boquist v. Courtney

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 30, 2023

Brown v. Cascade Mgmt., Inc., No. 3:15-cv-01585-HZ, 2018 WL 4207097, at *11 (D. Or. Sept. 4, 2018) (citing Hunt v. City of Portland, No. CV 08-802-AC, 2011 WL 355572, at *7 (D. Or. Aug. 11, 2011)). … Pollard v. City of Portland, No. CV-01-114-ST, 2001 WL 34042624, at *5 (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2001). There are also instances where duplicate hours may be deducted. Brown v.

Allstate Insurance v. Simms

597 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 13, 1984

This court reviewed an identical exclusion clause in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Browning, 598 F.Supp. 421 (D.Or.1983) (Frye, J.). … United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Pacific Northwest Research Foundation, 39 Or.App. 873 , 593 P.2d 1278 (1979); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Browning, supra, at 424. Allstate contends no such prejudice will occur.

Jose v. M/V FIR GROVE

801 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 27, 1992

Co. v. … EEOC v.

Upton v. The Charles Wetmore

51 F. 449 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 9, 1892

V.,” which means, according to the “International Code of Signals,” “Damaged rudder; cannot steer.” 4. … Before si ailing over the bar the master of the Wetmore was called on board the Zambesi, whore between him, the pilot, and the master of the Zambesi, some signals to be used in crossing the bar were agreed upon.

Zweizig v. Nw. Direct Teleservices Inc.

331 F. Supp. 3d 1173 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 25, 2018

See Roy v. … However, as the Court has previously noted, Judge Brown confirmed the arbitration award, which included the arbitrator's credibility determinations and findings of fact, in 2012. See Nw. Direct Teleservices Inc. v.

Bennett v. Bennett

3 F. Cas. 212 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 26, 1867

Mar. & Div. § 728; Barber v. Barber, 21 How. [62 U. S.] 582. In the case of Barber v. Barber, supra, the parties while domiciled in the state of New York were divorced simply from bed and board. … Craig v. Brown, [Case No. 3,328;] Mewster v. Spalding, [Id. 9,513;] Tooker v. Thompson, [Id. 14,097.] But it seems very questionable if this interpretation of the act is the correct one.

Jackson v. New York Life Insurance

299 F. 679 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 28, 1924

forwarded in due time to the home office of the company in New York, and on May 28, 1919, the policy was issued and mailed to the Portland office of the company, with instructions to hold it until released by the medical board … But later the Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of New York Life Insurance Co. v.

Wilson v. Czerniak

238 F. Supp. 2d 1207 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 21, 2002

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). … However, the Brown Court stated in a footnote that “We are not concerned here with the double jeopardy questions that may arise when a defendant is retried on the same charge after a mistrial .... ” Brown, 432 U.S. at 165