Case law

Millhollin v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

531 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 31, 1981

On review, the Supreme Court noted that Congress delegated expansive authority to the Federal Reserve Board to elaborate and expand the legal framework of the Act. FMCC v. … The Board has consistently construed the statute and regulations to impose no requirement that an acceleration clause always be disclosed.

United States v. Smith

696 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 3, 1988

V(c); Mauro, 436 U.S. at 364-65 , 98 S.Ct. at 1849-50 ; Brown v. Wolff, 706 F.2d 902, 905 (9th Cir.1983). The prisoner need not demonstrate any prejudice arising from the delay of her trial to entitle her to relief. … See Johnson v. Stagner, 781 F.2d 758 , 762 n. 7 (9th Cir.1986); Brown v. Wolff, 706 F.2d 902 , 907 n. 9 (9th Cir.1983). I find it unnecessary to decide this issue here.

Pinard v. Clatskanie School District GJ

319 F. Supp. 2d 1214 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 3, 2004

Mitchell’s decision was then adopted by the school board. Plaintiffs then filed this lawsuit. … See, e.g., Epperson v.

Regional Local Union Nos. 846 and 847, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO; Regional District Council Welfare Plan and Trust, f/k/a Local 846 Rebar Welfare Trust, By and Through Its Board of Trustees; Regional District Council Retirement Plan and Trust, f/k/a Rebar Retirement Plan and Trust, By and Through Its Board of Trustees; Regional District Council Training Trust, f/k/a Local 846 Training Trust, By and Through Its Board of Trustees; and Regional District Council Vacation Trust Fund, f/k/a Local 846 Vacation Trust, By and Through Its Board of Trustees v. Triton Steel, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 16, 2025

United States v. RiverCliff Farm, Inc., 2017 WL 3388172, *1 (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2017) (citations omitted); see also Derek Andrew, Inc. v. … McElmurry v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 2008 WL 1925119, *3 (D. Or. Apr. 30, 2008) (quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 (1984)).

Zografos v. Qwest Communications Corp.

225 F. Supp. 2d 1217 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 12, 2002

Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399 (9th Cir.1998). … See also, Primus Automotive Financial Servs., Inc. v.

Cordova v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.

104 F. Supp. 3d 1119 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 8, 2015

See Warren v. … Third-Party Defendants rely on a 2008 decision by Judge Brown in a similar case. Phelps v. 3PD, Inc., No. 03:08-cv-00387-HU, 2008 WL 4911909 (D.Or. Nov. 12, 2008).

Emmert Industrial Corp. v. City of Milwaukie

450 F. Supp. 2d 1164 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 30, 2006

Washington Legal Found. v. Legal Found. of Washington, 271 F.3d 835, 851 (9th Cir.2001), aff'd sub nom. Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington, 538 U.S. 216 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 , 155 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003). … Wedges/Ledges of California, Inc. v. City of Phoenix, 24 F.3d 56, 62 (9th Cir.1994), citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); see also Dittman v.

Garboden v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

258 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 19, 1966

Graham v. Ribicoff, 295 F.2d 391 (9th Cir. 1961); Mark v. Celebrezze, 348 F.2d 289 (9th Cir. 1965). … Banks v. Celebrezze, 341 F.2d 801 (6th Cir. 1965); Brown v. Celebrezze, 347 F.2d 227 (4th Cir. 1955).

Smith v. United States

702 F. Supp. 1480 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 6, 1989

United States v. Mitchell, 553 F.2d 996, 1002 (5th Cir.1977); see also Foley, 336 U.S. at 285 , 69 S.Ct. at 577 . In Meredith v. … The speakers at the briefing were Art Brown, an employee of ITT/ANS, and David M. Bresnahan, an employee of the National Science Foundation (“NSF”). 13. At the briefing, Mr. Brown and/or Mr.

Delaney v. Shobe

235 F. Supp. 662 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 12, 1964

Judge Magruder, in Francis v. … As a member of the Board of Control, the Governor’s freedom from liability is even clearer.

Board of Trustees of the Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund v. United States Bakery

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 22, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOARD … ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION Plaintiff, TO TRANSFER VENUE 14 v.

Dalles City v. Missionary Society of M. E. Church

6 F. 356 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 3, 1879

Marcus Whitman, the agent of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, and then engaged as a lay missionary of said board at a place called Wailatpu, about 140 miles E. N. … Bright v. Rochester, 7 Wheat. 548 ; Watkins v. Holman, 15 Pet. 53 ; Croxall v. Shered, 5 Wall. 287 ; Merryman v. Bourne, 9 Wall. 600 .

Handy v. Lane County

937 F. Supp. 2d 1297 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 26, 2013

BACKGROUND Prior to the initiation of this lawsuit, plaintiff Handy, and defendants Bozievich, Leiken, and Stewart served as duly elected members of the County Board of Commissioners (“Board”). … The Board is a five-member governing body 1 duly chartered and elected under Oregon Law to make decisions on behalf of the County.

States v. II Cases, More or Less, Ido-Pheno-Chon

94 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 31, 1950

Brown v. Heinen, D.C., 61 F.Supp. 563, 564 . . Petition of Mundorff, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 7, 9 . . In such cases, the want of jurisdiction of the subject matter cannot be waived by appearance or consent. Thus in Ellenwood v. … United States v. 74 Cases, Each Containing 48 Cans of C. C. Brand Oysters, D.C., 55 F.Supp. 745, 746 . . United States v. 23 Gross Jars, More or Less, of Enca Cream, D.C., 86 F. Supp. 824, 825 .

The Iowa

34 F. Supp. 843 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 7, 1940

Southern Pacific Co. v. United States, 72 F.2d 212, 215 .” … McCahan Sugar Refining Co. v. Wilderoft), 201 U.S. 378 , 26 S.Ct. 467 , 50 L.Ed. 794 ; The Southwark (Martin v. Southwark), supra, 191 U.S. 12 , 24 S.Ct. 1 , 48 L.Ed. 65 . Atlantic Transport Co. of West Virginia v.

Citizens Interested in Bull Run, Inc. v. Edrington

781 F. Supp. 1502 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 20, 1991

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Harper v. Wallingford, 877 F.2d 728, 731 (9th Cir.1989). … See United States v. St. Pierre, 578 F.Supp. *1510 1424 (D.C.S.D.1983); and United States v. Olson, 41 F.Supp. 433 (D.C.Ky.1941).

White v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

24 F. Supp. 871 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 1, 1938

Co., 70 Or. 116 , 140 P. 629 ; Gill v. Selling et al., 125 Or. 587 , 267 P. 812 , 58 A.L.R. 1556 ; Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, 139 Or. 198 , 7 P.2d 263 , 9 P.2d 128 ; and McCarthy v. … Schultz v. Brown, 9 Cir., 256 F. 187 , was an early ease in this Circuit. One Montana sheepherder had assaulted another in a range dispute.

Butros v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

804 F. Supp. 1336 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 25, 1991

Blancada v. Turnage, 891 F.2d 688, 690 (9th Cir.1989). … Id.; Santana-Figueroa v. INS, 644 F.2d 1354, 1357 (9th Cir.1981).

United States v. Rawlins

770 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 3, 1991

United States v. Unruh, 855 F.2d 1363, 1371 (9th Cir.1987); United States v. Wolf, 820 F.2d 1499, 1503 (9th Cir.1987), citing United States v. … Pursuant to the rule announced in McNally v.

Labedz v. Kramer

55 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 18, 1944

Justice Douglas, in his concurring opinion in Kiyoshi Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 , 63 S.Ct. 1375 , 87 L.Ed. 1774 , made that plain. United States v. … Alexander v. De Witt et al., 9 Cir., 141 F.2d 573 . See Yakus v. United States, 64 S.Ct. 660 .