Case law

Mark v. Valley Insurance

275 F. Supp. 2d 1307 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 17, 2003

Food and Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). … Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 132 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 .

Barnes v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

825 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 18, 2011

ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … Mars v.

Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon v. United States

841 F. Supp. 1479 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 21, 1994

See also Board of Natural Resources v. Brown, 992 F.2d 937 (9th Cir.1998). … Truong v.

Sizemore v. City of Dallas

443 F. Supp. 2d 1201 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 9, 2006

Tucker v. State of California Dep’t of Educ., 97 F.3d 1204, 1211 (9th Cir.1996) (citing Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968)). … Chateaubriand v. Gaspard, 97 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir. 1996) (citing Board of County Comm’rs v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 675 , 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996)).

Miller v. Hedlund

579 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 24, 1984

The Enrico’s court also specifically rejected the reasoning of Lewis-Westco & Co. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 136 Cal. … Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 21 Cal.3d 431 , 146 Cal.Rptr. 585 , 579 P.2d 476 (1978), and its own earlier decision in Midcal Aluminum v. Rice, 90 Cal.App.3d 979 , 153 Cal.Rptr. 757 (1979), affd sub nom.

Downey v. Crabtree

923 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 22, 1996

Id. at 1091, quoting Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1990). This court finds that it would be futile to require' petitioner to make further administrative efforts. 2. … See United States v. Amparo, 68 F.3d 1222, 1224 (9th Cir.1995); United States v. Canon, 993 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir.1993).

Interstate Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Mylark

90 F. Supp. 466 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 24, 1950

Co. v. U. S., 4 Cir., 3 F.2d 1021 , Standard Oil Co. v. U. S., 4 Cir., 1 F.2d 961 , Frey & Sons v. U. S., 4 Cir., 1 F.2d 953 , North Coast Stevedoring Co. v. U. S., 9 Cir., 17 F.2d 874 . … In the case of United States v.

Lewis v. International Business MacHines Corp.

393 F. Supp. 305 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 31, 1974

Willamette View Manor v. Peet, supra. … The same can be said for the findings prepared both by the referee and the Appeals Board.” Hickam v. Morgan, 9 Or.App. 25, 29 , 495 P.2d 1243, 1245 (1972).

Baker v. Daly

15 F.2d 881 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 22, 1926

Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U. S. 578 , 17 S. Ct. 427 , 41 L. Ed. 832 ; Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390 , 43 S. Ct. 625 , 67 L. Ed. 1042 , 29 A. L. R. 1446. … Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133 , 14 S. Ct. 499 , 38 L. Ed. 385 . In our opinion the legislation in question violates that rule.

Linnton Plywood Ass'n v. United States

410 F. Supp. 1100 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 30, 1976

. § 1381 (a)(2); Linnton Plywood Association v. United States, 236 F.Supp. 227 (D.Or.1964); Puget Sound Plywood, Inc. v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 305 (1965). … The board of directors (board) meets at least once a month. The board minutes are published and distributed for review by the members. Daily production records are posted.

Regional Local Union Nos. 846 and 847, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO; Regional District Council Welfare Plan and Trust, f/k/a Local 846 Rebar Welfare Trust, By and Through Its Board of Trustees; Regional District Council Retirement Plan and Trust, f/k/a Rebar Retirement Plan and Trust, By and Through Its Board of Trustees; Regional District Council Training Trust, f/k/a Local 846 Training Trust, By and Through Its Board of Trustees; and Regional District Council Vacation Trust Fund, f/k/a Local 846 Vacation Trust, By and Through Its Board of Trustees v. Triton Steel, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 16, 2025

United States v. RiverCliff Farm, Inc., 2017 WL 3388172, *1 (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2017) (citations omitted); see also Derek Andrew, Inc. v. … McElmurry v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 2008 WL 1925119, *3 (D. Or. Apr. 30, 2008) (quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 (1984)).

M & M Wood Working Co. v. Plywood & Veneer Workers Local Union No. 102

23 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 10, 1938

If the National Labor Relations Board had designated this union as the bargaining agent, then the agreement would have been enforced by the courts by all proper powers, including injunction. Oberman & Co. v. … National Lumber Workers Union v.

Gifford Pinchot Alliance v. Butruille

752 F. Supp. 967 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 10, 1990

Rockbridge v. Lincoln, 449 F.2d 567, 571 (9th Cir.1971) (citing Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 , 82 S.Ct. 585, 591 , 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962)). … That injunction stopped the sale of 6.9 million board feet of timber and caused the Forest Service to fall short of its FY 1989 target. Id.

United States v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

37 F.R.D. 322 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 3, 1965

v. … Grinnell Co. v.

In re Portland Electric Power Co.

97 F. Supp. 857 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 22, 1951

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in White v. Portland Electric Power Co., 162 F.2d 618 , approved this ruling. The last petition for certiorari lapsed in the Supreme Court of the United States. Watson v. … See opinion Portland General Electric Co. v. Raver, dated April 29, 1946, D. C., 97 F.Supp. 892 , and opinion Delzell v. Raver, dated April 29, 1946, D.C., 97 F.Supp. 893 . .

United States v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

554 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 3, 1982

A factual determination is now required, and the Board must withhold deportation if certain facts exist. … See Asarco v.

Bailey v. Oregon State Treasurer

District Court, D. Oregon · May 5, 2024

See Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 360 (2001); College Sav. Bank v. Fla. Prepaid Postsecondary Educ. Expense Bd., 527 U.S. 666, 669-70 (1999). … Brown v.

United States v. Smith

696 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 3, 1988

V(c); Mauro, 436 U.S. at 364-65 , 98 S.Ct. at 1849-50 ; Brown v. Wolff, 706 F.2d 902, 905 (9th Cir.1983). The prisoner need not demonstrate any prejudice arising from the delay of her trial to entitle her to relief. … See Johnson v. Stagner, 781 F.2d 758 , 762 n. 7 (9th Cir.1986); Brown v. Wolff, 706 F.2d 902 , 907 n. 9 (9th Cir.1983). I find it unnecessary to decide this issue here.

United States v. Nicholson

12 F. 522 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 14, 1882

U. 8. v. Morton, 1 Low. 179 . Where the passengers go on board openly, they are presumed to have been taken on board by the master within the purview of this section, (U. 8. v. Thomson, 12 Fed. … . ¡7. 8. v. The Neurea, 19 How. 94 . -[Ed.

Miller v. Mallery

410 F. Supp. 1283 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 5, 1976

S. v. … Roberts v. U. S., 176 U.S. 221 , 20 S.Ct. 376 , 44 L.Ed. 443 (1900); Carey v. Local Board, 297 F.Supp. 252 (D.Conn.1969); aff’d, 412 F.2d 71 (2 Cir. 1969). V. WHAT DUTY DOES THE ACT CREATE?