Case law

United States v. Jara-Medina

308 F. Supp. 3d 1150 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 10, 2018

United States v. Martinez , 786 F.3d 1227 , 1230 (9th Cir. 2015). … But see, United States v.

Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Management

223 F. Supp. 3d 1147 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 21, 2016

Gutierrez v. … Hensley v.

Ha v. Popoff

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 3, 2019

Resp’t Exs. 119, 121-22; Ha v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 282 Or. App. 227 (2016), rev. denied, 360 Or. 851 (2017). … Brown □□□ Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 405-06 (2000).

Harper v. Farm Credit Administration

628 F. Supp. 1030 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 4, 1985

VanLeeuwen, et al. v. … See VanLeeuwen v. Farm Credit Administration, 600 F.Supp. 1161 (D.Or.1984); 600 F.Supp. 1173 (D.Or.1984). I dismissed Coleman, et al. v.

U S West Communications, Inc. v. TCG Oregon

35 F. Supp. 2d 1237 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 30, 1998

See Brown v. General Serv. … TCG contends that the Eighth Circuit’s decision Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Comm’n, 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir.1997) “removes all doubt that [this claim] is legally invalid.”

Regional Local Union No. 846 v. Gulf Coast Rebar, Inc.

194 F. Supp. 3d 1096 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 13, 2016

See Thomas v. … For example, in United Steelworkers of America v.

United States v. McArdle

26 F. Cas. 1042 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 1, 1873

Counsel for the motion maintain that this act does not apply to seamen other than those on board American vessels. … S. v. Fisher, 2 Cranch [6 U. S.] 386. I find the latest enunciation of the gefieral rule upon this subject laid down in Hadden v. The Collector, 5 Wall. [72 U. S.] 110, by Mr.

United States v. The Tug Manzanillo

190 F. Supp. 229 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 25, 1960

“Earnings” is sufficiently extensive to include not only the wages paid, but also any other pecuniary benefits to him resulting from the contract of employment, including board. Burns v. … On the other hand, maintenance and cure means nothing more than board, lodging and hospital, doctor and medical expenses. Board and lodging are normally included in a person’s earnings.

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.

128 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 30, 1953

Conn, Limited, v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 1939, 108 F.2d 390, 397 . See also National Labor Relations Board v. Mt. … National Labor Belations Board v. Star Publishing Co., 9 Cir., 1938, 97 F.2d 465, 470 . Economic coercion or necessity is no justification. National Labor Belations Board v.

Pacific Fruit & Produce Co. v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission

41 F. Supp. 175 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 29, 1941

Popper & Co. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, D. C., 16 F.Supp. 762, 763 . Tyler v. Dane County, Wis., D.C., 289 F. 843 ; Board of Commissioners of Jackson County, Kansas v. … Popper & Co. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, supra; United Contracting Co. v. Duby, supra, 134 Or. at pages 21, 22, 292 P. 309 ; Miller Supply Co. v. State Board of Control, supra.

Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. v. University of Oregon

121 F. Supp. 3d 1047 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 4, 2015

See, e.g., Brown v. Kayler, 273 F.2d 588, 592 (9th Cir.1959). … The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has determined that laches and acquiescence are not available where cancellation is based on fraud. See Marshak v. Treadwell, 240 F.3d 184, 193, n. 2 (3d Cir.2001).

Sands v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

148 F. Supp. 422 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 27, 1956

Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. … Rueda v. Union Pacific R. Co., supra.

Ex parte Hamaguchi

161 F. 185 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 6, 1908

That the decisions of the said boards of special inquiry shall have the same force and effect as decisions rendered by boards of special inquiry at seaports of the United States.” … Ed. 917 ; United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U. S. 253 , 25 Sup. Ct. 644, 49 L. Ed. 1040 ; Chin Yow v. United States, 208 U. S. 8 , 28 Sup. Ct. 201, 52 L. Ed. --, recently decided by the same court.

United States v. Hanten

500 F. Supp. 188 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 31, 1980

S. v. Trenor Scott, Civ. No. 76-352-M.F. 101-1 (D.Or. Aug. 29, 1978). … The easement condemned by the government would allow the use of one “salmon board” through June 15th of each year.

Kuderer v. United States

739 F. Supp. 1422 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 1, 1990

Foley v. Bouvy, 158 Or. 327, 335 , 75 P.2d 14 (1938). … See, e.g., Branchfield v. McCulley, 192 Or. 270 , 231 P.2d 771 (1951); Marion Auto. Co. v. Brown, 127 Or. 551 , 272 P. 914 (1928). The evidence with respect to the lease is equivocal.

Brookings State Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

281 F. 222 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 26, 1922

This was in pursuance of a policy inaugurated by the board to induce nonmember banks which are without the pale of the act to remit at par, and thus to unify bank clearances and collections throughout the country. … American Bank & Trust Co. et al. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 256 U. S. 350 , 41 Sup. Ct. 499, 65 L. Ed. 983 . - In the opinion the distinguished jurist has this to say: .

Price v. City of Sutherlin

945 F. Supp. 2d 1147 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 9, 2013

Plaintiff eventually located Brown and, at approximately 6:30pm, went to his apartment, where she drank beer and several ounces of whiskey. Plaintiff then became “weird” and Brown asked her to leave. … Fulton, who had been looking for plaintiff, located her with Brown within a block of Price’s residence.

Jacobsen v. Dalles, P. & A. Nav. Co.

93 F. 975 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 6, 1899

Dresser and Forde are joined in the libel, — Dresser as the administrator of the estate of Hansen, who was on board the sailing vessel, and who was drowned as a result of the accident; and Forde, who was also on board the … Insurance Co. v. Johnson, 1 Blatchf. & H. 9 , 1 Fed. Cas. 665 ; Ben, Adm. § 884.

The Staghound & The Gamecock

97 F. 973 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 1, 1899

the Stag-hound, for service on board said steamer, for a trip to Alaska. … It is claimed in behalf of the representatives of the transportation company that this case is within the doctrine of the case of Grossett v. Townsend, 30 C. C.

Regional Local Union No. 846 v. Gulf Coast Rebar, Inc.

83 F. Supp. 3d 997 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 26, 2015

See Thomas v. … See United Steelworkers of America v.