Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersord

3,469 results

1.94s

  • Hudson-Duncan & Co. v. Wallace

    21 F. Supp. 295 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 17, 1937

    (N.S.) 1151, Ann.Cas.1916A, 18; Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United States, 234 U.S. 342 , 34 S. Ct. 833 , 58 L.Ed. 1341 ; Board of Trustees v. United States, 289 U.S. 48 , 53 S.Ct. 509 , 77 L.Ed. 1025 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 , rendered April 12, 1937. Railroad Retirement Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Glenearne

    7 F. 604 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 7, 1881

    Adm. §§ 289-391; The Wright, 1 Deady, 597 ; The California, 1 Sawy. 467 ; Steam-ship Co. v. Joliffe, 2 Wall. 457 ; Ex parte McNiel, 13 Wall. 242 . … Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 207 ; Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. 316 ; Ex parte McNeil, 13 Wall. 236 ; The Panama, 1 Deady, 31 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Federal Deposit Insurance v. Former Officers & Directors of Metropolitan Bank

    705 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 24, 1987

    Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d at 879 (Solomon, J.). In International Railways, the circuit recognized that the odds were against a reconstituted board of directors authorizing suit. … Cardinal, 452 F.Supp. 542 (D.Vt.1978), and that the limitations period was not tolled because defendants did not dominate the boards of directors of the banks. Mosesian v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Vo

    District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 20, 2026

    Brown v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 703 F.Supp.3d 1256, 1260 (D. Or. 2023) (citations and internal quotations omitted). … Brown, 703 F.Supp.3d at 1268.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Heine v. Bank of Oswego

    144 F. Supp. 3d 1198 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2015

    For example, in Cox v. … From 2004 through March 2012, Yates was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, co-founder, and Secretary of the Bank's Board of Directors. . United States v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ellis v. Hanson Natural Resources Co.

    857 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 24, 1994

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552-53 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). … Hanson Natural Resources thereafter reasonably relied upon the efforts of the National Guard to replace the marker board. There is evidence that the marker board was replaced.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lenske v. Sercombe

    266 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 17, 1967

    ORS 9.480 grants to *612 the members of the Board of Governors the limited power to recommend to the Supreme Court the suspension, disbarment or reprimand of a lawyer. … Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 353 U.S. 252 , 77 S.Ct. 722 , 1 L.Ed.2d 810 (1957); Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Theard v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. Walsh

    78 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 28, 1948

    See Putnam v. … In Butler v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • United States v. Aho

    68 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 15, 1944

    In State Land Board v. … Bauman, D.C.Or., 56 F.Supp. 109 . 5 Hagar v. Board of Supervisors of Yolo County, 47 Cal. 222, 233 . See as to irrigation: Twin Falls Land & Water Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co., D.C., 7 F.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • The California

    4 F. Cas. 1052 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 28, 1871

    Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. [53 U. S.] 311. The fourteenth admiralty rule authorizes a suit to be brought against the vessel for pilotage. Claims for pilotage are cases of admiralty jurisdiction. Ben. … In Steamship Company v. Joliffe, 2 Wall. [69 U.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Udall

    264 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 13, 1967

    More closely in point are Pease v. Udall, 332 F.2d 62 (9th Cir. 1964); Thor-Westcliffe Development Co. v. Udall, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 252 , 314 F.2d 257 (1963); and Haley v. … Carl v. Udall, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 33 , 309 F.2d 653 (1962); Linn Land Co. v. Udall, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Clark

    72 F. Supp. 393 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 31, 1947

    The War Contracts Price Adjustment Board makes a unilateral determination of the amount due as excessive profits and demands immediate payment. … Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bernhard v. Creene

    3 F. Cas. 279 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 12, 1874

    S. v. Kessler, [Case No. 15,528,] cited by counsel for defendant upon this question, is not in point. That was an indictment for robbery and piracy upon the high seas committed on board a foreign vessel. … In Patch v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Peterson v. Harville

    445 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 3, 1977

    Wade, Richard V. Francis, Bruce V. Broadhead, Daken K. Broadhead (Bruce’s father), and Leon Peterson (no relation to the plaintiffs). … Scalley, and Larry V.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • In re Ah Lee

    5 F. 899 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 19, 1880

    Upon the latter point council cite People v. Kelsey, 34 Cal. 475 ; People v. Albertson, 8 How. P. R. 363; Brown v. Blake, 49 Barb. 9 . … In support of this conclusion the court cites Taylor v. Skrine, 3 Brevard, 516; Brown v. O’Connell, 36 Conn. 432 ; The State v. Messmore, *913 1 4 Wis. 164 ; The State v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bingham v. Oregon School Activities Ass'n

    24 F. Supp. 2d 1110 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 22, 1998

    See also Dahl v. HEM Pharmaceuticals Corp., 7 F.3d 1399, 1403 (9th Cir.1993); Stanley v. University of Southern California, 13 F.3d 1313, 1320 (9th Cir.1994). … In Indiana High School Athletic Association, Inc. v.

    Vacated in part by Bingham v. Ediger, 20 F. App'x 720 (2001)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Beebe v. Pacific Realty Trust

    99 F.R.D. 60 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 16, 1983

    Brown & Sons (“Alex. Brown”) is a partnership organized under Maryland law. It is an investment banking firm and evaluates securities in the real estate industry. … Nichols v. Mobile Board of Realtors, Inc., 675 F.2d 671, 676 (5th Cir.1982). See also Pistoll, 96 F.R.D. at 28 . 2. Application.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Fikre v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    23 F. Supp. 3d 1268 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 29, 2014

    BROWN, District Judge. … See, e.g., Vance v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State of Oregon

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 9, 2022

    P. 12(h)(3); see also Pistor v. … Board of Trs. of Glazing Health and Welfare Trust v. Chambers, 941 F.3d 1195, 1198 (9th Cir. 2019) (en banc) (quoting America Cargo Transp., Inc. v. United States, 625 F.3d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir. 2010)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. $15,333.00 in United States Currency

    988 F. Supp. 2d 1229 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 18, 2013

    Brown’s claim and answer. CR # 60. … Malone v. United States Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir.1987); Adriana Intern. Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406 , 1412 (9th Cir.1990); United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.