Case law

Malosh v. Crabtree

758 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 8, 1991

See Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533 (9th Cir.1990). … Brown, 895 F.2d at 535 .

Bixby v. KBR, INC.

748 F. Supp. 2d 1224 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 22, 2010

Army, Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., 618 F.Supp.2d 400 (W.D.Pa.2009), KB & RS argued, as it does here, that the case should be dismissed under the political question doctrine. … Id.; see also Taylor v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Case No. 09-341, 2010 WL 1707530 , *10, *10-11, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50610 , *30, *31-32 (E.D.Va.

The Minnie E. Kelton

181 F. 237 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 2, 1910

J., in Bean et al. v. The Grace Brown, Fed. Cas. No. 1,171, is in accord with this definition. … “The rule of diligence obligatory on salvors,” says the court, in Serviss v. Ferguson, 84 Fed. 202 , 28 C. C.

Precision Seed Cleaners v. Country Mutual Insurance

976 F. Supp. 2d 1228 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 1, 2013

She currently sits on the paralegal education advisory board for Pioneer Pacific College in Oregon and for Clark College in Washington. Id. at ¶ 3. … Bank v. Derek L. Brown & Assocs., Inc., No. 03:10-cv-00674-BR, 2013 WL 164424 , at *4 (D.Or.

United States v. Merkel

357 F. Supp. 3d 1060 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 4, 2019

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, ex rel. Carter , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 1970 , 1974, 191 L.Ed.2d 899 (2015). … Kellogg Brown & Root , 135 S.Ct. at 1976 .

Davis v. Harris

570 F. Supp. 1136 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 23, 1983

In Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345 (9th Cir.1981), aff’d on another issue sub nom. Kush v. … Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345, 1349 (9th Cir.1981); Ronwin v. Shapiro, 657 F.2d 1071, 1074 (9th Cir.1981).

Capps v. Atiyeh

495 F. Supp. 802 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 22, 1980

They are essentially as follows: (1) The Parole Board will retroactively apply the new parole matrix. … E. g., Chapman v. Rhodes, supra; Ramos v. Lamm, supra; Palmigiano v. Garrahy, supra; Pugh v. Locke, supra; Johnson v. Levine, 450 F.Supp. 648 (D.Md.), aff’d in part and remanded, 588 F.2d 1378 (4th Cir. 1978); Gates v.

Dauven v. U.S. Bancorp

390 F. Supp. 3d 1262 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 13, 2019

Wyatt v. Terhune , 315 F.3d 1108 , 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing M/V American Queen v. San Die go Marine Constr. … On June 30, 2014, Judge Brown adopted this court's recommendation with respect to the conversion claim and dismissed it without prejudice. Dauven v. U.S.

Hensley v. Granning & Treece Loans, Inc.

378 F. Supp. 841 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 15, 1974

In support of this position, Plaintiff relies upon Philbeck v. Timmers Chevrolet, Inc., 361 F.Supp. 1255 (N.D.Ga.1973). … Bone v. Hibernia Bank, 493 F.2d 135 (9 Cir., 1974).

United States Spruce Production Corp. v. Lincoln County

285 F. 388 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 18, 1922

Sloan Shipyards Corporation et al. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency *390 Fleet Corporation, and allied cases (Nos. 308, 376, 526, October term, 1921) 258 U. S. 549 , 42 Sup. Ct. 386, 66 L. Ed.-. … King County, Wash., v. United States Ship. Board E. F. Corp., 282 Fed. 950 .

The Pescawha

45 F.2d 221 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 4, 1928

In Arch v. U. … S. v. Sischo, 262 U. S. 165 , 43 S. Ct. 511 , 67 L. Ed. 925 ; U. S. v.

Erwin v. Oregon Ex Rel. Kitzhaber

231 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 23, 2001

In Hoohuli v. … Drews v. EBI Cos., 310 Or. 134, 140 , 795 P.2d 531 (1990) (quoting Rennie v. Freeway Transport, 294 Or. 319, 323 , 656 P.2d 919 (1982)).

Seller v. Steamship Pacific

21 F. Cas. 1040 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 15, 1861

the board inwardly. … Co. v. M. Bank, 6 How. 344 ; Hollister v. Nowlen, 19 Wend. 234 .)

Messer v. Portland Adventist Medical Center

707 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 6, 1989

That same year, however, the court held in Brown v. … The Brown Court went on to state that it did not believe that its decision was inconsistent with its decision in Walsh because in Walsh the court had concluded that the statutory remedies were adequate. In Holien v.

Idaho Department of Fish & Game v. National Marine Fisheries Service

850 F. Supp. 886 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 28, 1994

Pacific Northwest Generating Co-op v. Brown, 822 F.Supp. 1479 (D.Or.1993), appeals dktd., Nos. 93-35531, 35532, 35536 (9th Cir.) (“PNGC v. Brown ”). … No. 93-1420-MA, and cross-claims in PNGC v. Brown, Civ. No. 92-973-MA. 17 . See footnote 13. 18 .

VanDyke

District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 12, 2026

About two months later, the VanDykes emailed Brown a copy of the quitclaim deed, explaining that it extinguished the easement. … (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)); see also Bell Atl. Corp. v.

Heine v. Bank of Oswego

144 F. Supp. 3d 1198 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2015

For example, in Cox v. … From 2004 through March 2012, Yates was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, co-founder, and Secretary of the Bank's Board of Directors. . United States v.

Vanderzanden Farms, LLC v. Dow Agrosciences, LLC

323 F. Supp. 2d 1075 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 24, 2004

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … See Brown v. Chas. H. Lilly Co., 161 Or.App. 402 , 986 P.2d 846 (1999).

Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States

57 F. Supp. 192 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 20, 1944

There were hearings held upon each, the application for Consolidated before joint Board No. 5, 4 and the application of O.N.C. before joint Board No. 11, commencing on July 8, 1940. … These joint Boards are authorized by 49 U.S.C.A. § 305 . Reliance is placed on the following cases among others. Interstate Commerce *195 Commission v. Louisville & Nasliville R.

Northwestern Improvement Co. v. John Day Irr. Dist.

286 F. 294 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 27, 1922

Said amount of money, when so determined by said board, shall' be and constitute an assessment upon aE of the land included in said district, and shaE be apportioned by said board to the lands owned or held by each person … Ed. 616 ; Mattingly v. District of Columbia, 97 U. S. 687 , 24 L. Ed. 1098 ; Walston v. Nevin, 128 U. S. 578 , 9 Sup. Ct. 192, 32 L. Ed. 544 ; Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 176 , 17 Sup.