Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersord

3,469 results

6.71s

  • McKinnon v. United States

    178 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 12, 1959

    Farwell Co. v. United States, Ct.C1.1953, 115 F.Supp. 477 . By reason thereof, the court is not bound by the decision of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals. John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. … United States, 1955, 132 F.Supp. 698 , 132 Ct.Cl. 645 ; Wagner Whirler & Derrick Corp. v. United States, 1954, 121 F.Supp. 664 , 128 Ct.Cl. 382 ; Farwell Co. v. United States, supra, and see 41 U.S.C.A. § 322 .

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. A. J. McKinnon Doing Business as McKinnon Construction Company, 289 F.2d 908 (1961)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Walls

    293 F. Supp. 3d 1251 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 10, 2018

    United States v. Terrell , 217 F.Supp.3d 1277 , 1285-87 (E.D. Wash. 2016) ; Pressley v. United States , 201 F.Supp.3d 1277 , 1282 (W.D. Wash. 2016) ; United States v. … To begin, neither Judge Mosman nor Judge Brown focused their opinions on the question currently before the Court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The California

    4 F. Cas. 1055 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 17, 1871

    In Supervisors v. U. S., 4 Wall. [71 U. … Lyon v. Jerome, 2G Wend. 485.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

    340 F. Supp. 2d 1118 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2003

    See Phillips v. … At most, it might tell a competitor how many thousand board feet of alder lumber Wey-erhaeuser sold in Ireland in 1990. It is disclosed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bong

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 18, 2026

    Defendant Oregon School Board Association (“OSBA”) issued a public letter “urg[ing] all school board members to get vaccinated,” and Defendant Woods later endorsed that position, too. … See U.S. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Keeley v. Evans

    271 F. 520 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 1921

    Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U. S. 79 , 30 Sup. Ct. 493, 54 L. Ed. 673 , 18 Ann. Cas. 865, first clause of syllabus. See, also, Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101 , 18 Sup. Ct. 805, 43 L. Ed. 91 , Dent v. … Ed. 623 , cited in Smith v. Texas, supra, and Field v. Barber Asphalt Co., 194 U. S. 618 , 24 Sup. Ct. 784, 48 L. Ed. 1142 . The case of Dent v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • The Ocean Spray

    18 F. Cas. 558 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 4, 1876

    . *83 On the twenty-fifth day out, the vessel put into the port of Victoria, V. … In Taber v. U. S., Fed.Cas.No.13,722, Mr.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • McBride v. Farrington

    60 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 30, 1945

    He personally heard some of the testimony at the trial of Farrington’s case before the Board of Tax Appeals and was present at the taking of depositions of Brown and Besson in the bankruptcy court in 1931, which transactions … . § 29 , sub. d. 9 See Heffron v. Duggins, 9 Cir., 115 F.2d 519 ; Durrett v. Harris, 148 Ark. 4 , 228 S.W. 386 ; Harrigan v. Bergdol, 270 U.S. 560 , 46 S.Ct. 413 , 70 L.Ed. 733 . 10 See Davis v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re Galena Biopharma, Inc. Securities Litigation

    117 F. Supp. 3d 1145 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 5, 2015

    Corp. v. … The minutes from the January 16, 2014 Board meeting reflect that after discussion, the Board lifted the trading blackout.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Willis v. Portland City Auditor

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 31, 2022

    Of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280 (1977); Board of Cty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). … See Ove v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bingham v. Oregon School Activities Ass'n

    37 F. Supp. 2d 1189 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 11, 1999

    McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 , 107 S.Ct. 1756 , 95 L.Ed.2d 262 (1987); Clark v. State of California, 123 F.3d 1267 (1997); Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, 970 F.Supp. 1094 (S.D.N.Y.1997). … School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 , 287 n. 17, 107 S.Ct. 1123 , 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987); Pottgen v. Missouri State High School Activities Association, 40 F.3d 926 929 (8th Cir.1994); Kaltenberger v.

    Vacated in part by Bingham v. Ediger, 20 F. App'x 720 (2001)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Colasanti

    282 F. Supp. 3d 1213 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 26, 2017

    It is also the approach employed by Chief Judge Gregory of the Fourth Circuit in his dissent from the court's decision in United States v. Brown , 868 F.3d 297 , 304 (4th Cir. 2017). … See Brown , 868 F.3d 297 ; Raybon , 867 F.3d 625 ; see also United States v. Miller , 868 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2017) (dismissing on the merits of petitioner's due process claim).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Duval v. Morton

    347 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 23, 1972

    Suchy on the unique character of this sand deposit and was the basis for the action of the Interior Board of Land Appeals in rejecting that portion of the examiner’s v decision which found that this sand did not have properties … Verrue v. United States, 457 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir.).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State of Or., Dept. of Human Resources v. Heckler

    651 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 31, 1984

    Therefore, the court will examine the Board’s factual findings in light of this law. In a series of cases culminating in Miranda v. … Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785 , 101 S.Ct. 1468 , 67 L.Ed.2d 685 (1981). IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Board is AFFIRMED.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bigoni v. Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc.

    746 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 21, 1990

    Bud Brown reviewed the statement with Hatch. … Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Oregon Retail Employees Pension Plan v. Signature Northwest LLC

    District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 7, 2021

    See Geddes v. United Fin. … Metal Workers v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Board of Trustees of the Oregon Retail Employees Pension Plan v. Signature Northwest LLC

    District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 1, 2021

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BOARD OF … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F. & R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Covert v. Centennial Queen

    185 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 3, 1960

    Weiss v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, 2 Cir., 1956, 235 F.2d 309 ; McKie v. Diamond Marine Co., 5 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 132 ; Early v. American Dredging Co., D.C.Pa.1951, 101 F.Supp. 393 ; Braen v. … Weiss v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, supra; McKie v. Diamond Marine Co., supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cook v. Secretary of the Air Force

    850 F. Supp. 901 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 22, 1994

    Hagemeier v. Block, 806 F.2d 197, 202-203 (8th Cir.1986); Gilbert v. DaGrossa, 756 F.2d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir.1985). … Rather, in Dehne v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rayfield

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 13, 2026

    P. 12(h)(3); see also Pistor v. … Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1133–34 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 155–56, (1908)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.