Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
6.71s
178 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 12, 1959
Farwell Co. v. United States, Ct.C1.1953, 115 F.Supp. 477 . By reason thereof, the court is not bound by the decision of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals. John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. … United States, 1955, 132 F.Supp. 698 , 132 Ct.Cl. 645 ; Wagner Whirler & Derrick Corp. v. United States, 1954, 121 F.Supp. 664 , 128 Ct.Cl. 382 ; Farwell Co. v. United States, supra, and see 41 U.S.C.A. § 322 .
Reversed on other grounds by United States v. A. J. McKinnon Doing Business as McKinnon Construction Company, 289 F.2d 908 (1961)Cited 4 timesPublished293 F. Supp. 3d 1251 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 10, 2018
United States v. Terrell , 217 F.Supp.3d 1277 , 1285-87 (E.D. Wash. 2016) ; Pressley v. United States , 201 F.Supp.3d 1277 , 1282 (W.D. Wash. 2016) ; United States v. … To begin, neither Judge Mosman nor Judge Brown focused their opinions on the question currently before the Court.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 F. Cas. 1055 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 17, 1871
In Supervisors v. U. S., 4 Wall. [71 U. … Lyon v. Jerome, 2G Wend. 485.
Cited 1 timesPublishedConfederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
340 F. Supp. 2d 1118 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2003
See Phillips v. … At most, it might tell a competitor how many thousand board feet of alder lumber Wey-erhaeuser sold in Ireland in 1990. It is disclosed.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Mar 18, 2026
Defendant Oregon School Board Association (“OSBA”) issued a public letter “urg[ing] all school board members to get vaccinated,” and Defendant Woods later endorsed that position, too. … See U.S. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown271 F. 520 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 1921
Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U. S. 79 , 30 Sup. Ct. 493, 54 L. Ed. 673 , 18 Ann. Cas. 865, first clause of syllabus. See, also, Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101 , 18 Sup. Ct. 805, 43 L. Ed. 91 , Dent v. … Ed. 623 , cited in Smith v. Texas, supra, and Field v. Barber Asphalt Co., 194 U. S. 618 , 24 Sup. Ct. 784, 48 L. Ed. 1142 . The case of Dent v.
Cited 9 timesPublished18 F. Cas. 558 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 4, 1876
. *83 On the twenty-fifth day out, the vessel put into the port of Victoria, V. … In Taber v. U. S., Fed.Cas.No.13,722, Mr.
Cited 10 timesPublished60 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 30, 1945
He personally heard some of the testimony at the trial of Farrington’s case before the Board of Tax Appeals and was present at the taking of depositions of Brown and Besson in the bankruptcy court in 1931, which transactions … . § 29 , sub. d. 9 See Heffron v. Duggins, 9 Cir., 115 F.2d 519 ; Durrett v. Harris, 148 Ark. 4 , 228 S.W. 386 ; Harrigan v. Bergdol, 270 U.S. 560 , 46 S.Ct. 413 , 70 L.Ed. 733 . 10 See Davis v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedIn re Galena Biopharma, Inc. Securities Litigation
117 F. Supp. 3d 1145 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 5, 2015
Corp. v. … The minutes from the January 16, 2014 Board meeting reflect that after discussion, the Board lifted the trading blackout.
Cited 15 timesPublishedWillis v. Portland City Auditor
District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 31, 2022
Of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280 (1977); Board of Cty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). … See Ove v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBingham v. Oregon School Activities Ass'n
37 F. Supp. 2d 1189 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 11, 1999
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 , 107 S.Ct. 1756 , 95 L.Ed.2d 262 (1987); Clark v. State of California, 123 F.3d 1267 (1997); Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, 970 F.Supp. 1094 (S.D.N.Y.1997). … School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 , 287 n. 17, 107 S.Ct. 1123 , 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987); Pottgen v. Missouri State High School Activities Association, 40 F.3d 926 929 (8th Cir.1994); Kaltenberger v.
Vacated in part by Bingham v. Ediger, 20 F. App'x 720 (2001)Cited 2 timesPublished282 F. Supp. 3d 1213 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 26, 2017
It is also the approach employed by Chief Judge Gregory of the Fourth Circuit in his dissent from the court's decision in United States v. Brown , 868 F.3d 297 , 304 (4th Cir. 2017). … See Brown , 868 F.3d 297 ; Raybon , 867 F.3d 625 ; see also United States v. Miller , 868 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2017) (dismissing on the merits of petitioner's due process claim).
Cited 2 timesPublished347 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 23, 1972
Suchy on the unique character of this sand deposit and was the basis for the action of the Interior Board of Land Appeals in rejecting that portion of the examiner’s v decision which found that this sand did not have properties … Verrue v. United States, 457 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir.).
Cited 2 timesPublishedState of Or., Dept. of Human Resources v. Heckler
651 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 31, 1984
Therefore, the court will examine the Board’s factual findings in light of this law. In a series of cases culminating in Miranda v. … Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785 , 101 S.Ct. 1468 , 67 L.Ed.2d 685 (1981). IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Board is AFFIRMED.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBigoni v. Pay 'N Pak Stores, Inc.
746 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 21, 1990
Bud Brown reviewed the statement with Hatch. … Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the Oregon Retail Employees Pension Plan v. Signature Northwest LLC
District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 7, 2021
See Geddes v. United Fin. … Metal Workers v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoard of Trustees of the Oregon Retail Employees Pension Plan v. Signature Northwest LLC
District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 1, 2021
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BOARD OF … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F. & R.
Cited 0 timesUnknown185 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 3, 1960
Weiss v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, 2 Cir., 1956, 235 F.2d 309 ; McKie v. Diamond Marine Co., 5 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 132 ; Early v. American Dredging Co., D.C.Pa.1951, 101 F.Supp. 393 ; Braen v. … Weiss v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, supra; McKie v. Diamond Marine Co., supra.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCook v. Secretary of the Air Force
850 F. Supp. 901 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 22, 1994
Hagemeier v. Block, 806 F.2d 197, 202-203 (8th Cir.1986); Gilbert v. DaGrossa, 756 F.2d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir.1985). … Rather, in Dehne v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Mar 13, 2026
P. 12(h)(3); see also Pistor v. … Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1133–34 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 155–56, (1908)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna