Case law

Dodds v. Simpson

676 F. Supp. 1045 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 19, 1987

Jackson v. Franklin County School Board, 806 F.2d 623 , 627- *1047 28 (5th Cir.1986); Board of Education v. Diamond, 808 F.2d 987, 995-96 (3rd Cir.1986). … Id.; accord Bradley v.

United States v. Goodpaster

65 F. Supp. 3d 1016 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 1, 2014

Shortly thereafter, Goodpaster indicated that he wanted “to take [the matter] to [the] MSPB board.” Dkt. 33, Gov. Ex. 5 (notes of SA Byrd). … Brown v. Horell, 644 F.3d 969, 982 (9th Cir.2011).

Hughes v. Flemming

195 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 10, 1961

Jacobson v. Folsom, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1957, 158 F.Supp. 281, 285 . See also, Hill v. Fleming, D.C.W.D.Pa. 1958, 169 F.Supp. 240 . … Sobel v. Flemming, D.C.E.D.Pa.1959, 178 F.Supp. 891, 895 . The following quotation from the decision in Kohrs v.

In Re Yamashita-Shinnihon Kisen

305 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 16, 1969

The Canadian salvage tug SUDBURY II arrived in the vicinity of MANDOIL at 1954 March 1st and at 0845 March 2nd the TRANSONEIDA boarding party delivered v. … I am satisfied this is not the law, United States v.

Port of Bandon v. Oliver J. Olson & Co.

175 F. Supp. 736 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 25, 1959

V. … Co. v.

Bobosky v. Adidas AG

843 F. Supp. 2d 1134 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

Lane Ltd. v. … Int’l, B.V. v.

Multibank 2009-1 Res-ADC Venture, LLC v. PineCrest at Neskowin, LLC

857 F. Supp. 2d 1072 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 8, 2012

In McCarthy v. … See, e.g., Bolduc v.

Campbell v. Delma Ann, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2020

Brown v. Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc., No. 1:14-CV-2037, 2016 WL 3878111, at *1 3 – OPINION AND ORDER (N.D. Ohio July 18, 2016) (quoting Gonzalez v. … See Pl.’s Resp. 7–9; see Superior Oil Co. v. Trahan, 322 F.2d 234, 236 (5th Cir. 1963); Hatfield v. Brown & Root, Inc., 245 F.Supp. 733, 734 (E.D. Texas 1965); Quiles v.

United States v. Chiarito

69 F. Supp. 317 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 19, 1946

Co. v. … The local board which had jurisdiction to classify and assign him did not meet there. His local board did not assign him to Colorado, nor order him there.

Merrill v. the SS Cuaco

189 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 2, 1960

Bridging this gap were two boards. The libelant in that case walked on these boards. One board broke under his weight and he fell and sustained injuries. … In Seas Shipping Co. v.

CIA. Estrella Blanca, LTDA. v. S.S. NICTRIC

247 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 25, 1965

Generally, a “crew” is the equivalent of the ship’s company, and' ordinarily embraces those who are naturally and primarily on board the vessel to aid in her navigation. Norton v. … Brown v. Cowden Livestock Co., 187 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1951); Sam Macri & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 313 F.2d 119 (9th Cir. 1963); Interstate Plywood Sales Co. v.

United Transportation Union v. Burlington Northern Railroad

864 F. Supp. 138 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 22, 1994

Grace and Co. v. … Co. v. United Transp.

McCoy v. Cupp

298 F. Supp. 329 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 4, 1969

Browning v. United States, 366 F.2d 420 (9th Cir. 1966); United States v. Francolino, 367 F.2d 1013 (2d Cir. 1966); Harris v. Stephens, 361 F.2d 888 (8th Cir. 1966). … Browning v. United States, supra. The one hour delay was justified by the exigencies of the situation. Under all the facts, I believe the search was reasonably incident to Petitioner’s arrest. Fraker v.

Oregon v. Ashcroft

192 F. Supp. 2d 1077 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 17, 2002

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000); see also Lexecon Inc. v. … FDA v. Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 (citations omitted). It is undisputed that under the CSA, the Attorney General and the DEA have broad authority to regulate controlled substances.

United States v. Sartin

262 F. Supp. 2d 1154 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 19, 2003

When asked if Joy had a boyfriend, Brown said “there were multiple black males ... that hung around” Sartin’s apartment. Brown described one individual she believed was Sartin’s boyfriend, and the vehicles he drove. … Brown said “she sees this person at the apartment everyday, but that he has his own place.” Brown did not know if Turón had ever spent the night there, but was sure he “does not spend the night most of the time.”

Morgan v. N.W. Permanente, P.C.

989 F. Supp. 1330 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 22, 1997

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). … Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 251 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986).

Berman

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 3, 2025

Psychiatric Security Review Board, Defendants. … See Swift v. California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1190 (9th Cir. 2004); see also Harmon v. State, 320 Or.

Oracle America, Inc. v. Oregon Health Insurance Exchange Corp.

145 F. Supp. 3d 1018 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 18, 2015

The Supreme Court summarized the issue of waiver of immunity in Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. … The court, therefore, concluded the Illinois Legislature had not abrogated the Board’s Eleventh Amendment immunity and that the Board’s immunity had not been waived.

The Merrimac

17 F. Cas. 126 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 31, 1874

Sproul v. Hemmingway, 14 Pick. 7 . … In Sturgis v. Boyer, 24 How. [65 U.

The Idaho

29 F. 187 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 30, 1886

for the exceptions contended that the libel was insufficient because tlie illegal act charged therein is not alleged to have been done “contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided;” citing Briscoe v. … Cross v. U. S., 1 Gall. 29 ; Sears v. U. S., Id. 259; The Samuel , 1 Wheat. 14 ; The Merino, 9 Wheat. 401 .