Case law

Independent Living Resources v. Oregon Arena Corp.

982 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 12, 1997

Inc. v. … Craig, 429 U.S. at 193-94 , 97 S.Ct. at 454-455 ; Board of Natural Resources v. Brown, 992 F.2d 937, 945-46 (9th Cir.1993). The instant case would appear to be an appropriate candidate for jus tertii standing. 89 .

United States v. Lonseth

300 F. Supp. 857 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 11, 1969

Stain v. United States, 235 F.2d 339 (9th Cir. 1956). … This much-quoted language from Dickinson v.

Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School District No. 7

374 F. Supp. 1056 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 25, 1974

Westerville Board of Education, 345 F.Supp. 501 (S.D.Ohio E.D.1972). I agree with the District Court’s holding in Cohen v. … Green v. Waterford Board of Education, 473 F.2d 629 (2nd Cir. *1065 1973); Bravo v. Board of Education of City of Chicago, 345 F.Supp. 155 (N.D.Ill.E.D.1972); Williams v.

In re Quartz Gold Mining Co.

157 F. 243 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 18, 1907

Citing Rogers v. Pell, 154 N. Y. 527 , 49 N. E. 75 . So in the case of Cresson & Clearfield Coal & Coke Co. v. Stauffer, 148 Fed. 981, 984 , 78 C. C. … Patterson v. Smelting Works, 35 Or. 90 , 105, 56 Pac. 407 .

Hooks v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 8

905 F. Supp. 2d 1198 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 21, 2012

Walsh v. … The NLRB, consisting of five board members appointed by the president to five-year terms, controls the adjudicatory functions of the NLRB.

United States v. Taylor

488 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 22, 1980

The Fifth Circuit, in United States v. … In United States v.

Translogic Technology, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd.

404 F. Supp. 2d 1250 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 13, 2005

Materials, Inc. v. … District courts are not, however, bound by the Board’s rulings, and district courts are not required to stay litigation under these circumstances. See Vitronics Corp. v.

Morse v. State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 29, 2024

According to Chief Brown, SA Persons concluded the conversation by saying “Don’t tell anyone, keep it on the down low,” to which Chief Brown agreed. Brown Dep. 127:11-24. … Yet the review board, and ultimately the guardianship judge, still granted the guardianship.

United States v. Dillon

294 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 19, 1968

Dickinson v. United States, supra. In Dickinson v. … Fitts v. United States, 334 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1964). The uncontradicted evidence presented to the Board establishes that Dillon satisfied these requirements.

Tarhuni v. Lynch

129 F. Supp. 3d 1052 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 8, 2015

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion (#92) to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Court heard oral argument on June 25,2015. … V.

Plumb v. Prinslow

847 F. Supp. 1509 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 14, 1994

See Logan v. … Jancsek v. Oregon Board of Parole, 833 F.2d 1389 (9th Cir.1987); Pedro v. Oregon Parole Board, 825 F.2d 1396 (9th Cir.1987).

United States v. Harris

302 F. Supp. 1194 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 3, 1968

Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 , 75 S.Ct. 392 , 99 L.Ed. 428 (1955); Batterton v. United States, 260 F.2d 233 (8th Cir.1958); Ashauer v. United States, 217 F.2d 788 (9th Cir.1954). … Batterton v. United States, supra. Defendant’s claim was rejected because he had not been baptized as a Jehovah’s Witness. I do not think this provides a basis in fact for the local board’s action.

Repp v. Oregon Health Sciences University

972 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 4, 1997

Soignier v. American Board of Plastic Surgery, *548 92 F.3d 547, 550 (7th Cir.1996), cert. den.,-U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 771 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997); McCullough v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 35 F.3d 127, 129 (4th Cir.1994). … Davidson v. Board of Governors, 920 F.2d *550 441 (7th Cir.1990).

Wilson v. Chancellor

418 F. Supp. 1358 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 2, 1976

Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960); Barenblatt v. … See also Eisner v. Stamford Board of Education, 440 F.2d 803 (2d Cir. 1971). But see Fujishima v.

Dikes v. United States

353 F. Supp. 3d 1018 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 13, 2018

In Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc. , 289 Or. App. 672 , 410 P.3d 336 (2018), the worker was injured when a board on which he was standing broke. He fell 16 feet to the ground, which resulted in his paraplegia. … The worker and his wife brought claims against the retailer and the manufacturer of the board for strict products liability and loss of consortium.

Miller v. Heimuller

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 12, 2024

See, e.g., Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142 (1966) (holding that black protestors’ silent presence in a segregated public facility is protected expression). … Roulette v.

Technicon Instruments Corp. v. Alpkem Corp.

664 F. Supp. 1558 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 11, 1986

Hughes Aircraft Co. v. … In re Brown, 477 F.2d 946, 950 (CCPA 1973). The person of ordinary skill in the field must be someone who is skilled in the design of the devices in question, not just in the use of the device. Omark Industries, Inc. v.

United States v. Cartozian

6 F.2d 919 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 27, 1925

United States v. Thind, 261 U. S. 204, 209 , 43 S. Ct. 338 , 67 L. Ed. 616 . … Barton is foreign secretary of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions.

St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Oregon Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church

14 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 17, 1935

Davis of the General Board of Hospitals and Homes, officials of the Conference Board and the local Board of Directors.” … Plagge, supra; see Cattron et al. v. First Universalist Society, 46 Iowa, 106, 108 . Episcopal Charitable Society v. Episcopal Church, supra. See Cattron v. First Universalist Society, supra. Scott v.

The Saigon Maru

267 F. 881 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 16, 1920

Pursuant to the charter party, the steamer came to Portland, and here received on board a full cargo of lumber within her hold, and 241,559 feet, board measure, on her deck, but refused to take any further amount. … Darling & Son v. Raeburn, 10 Aspinall (N. S.) 268, on appeal 429.