Case law

The Ninfa

156 F. 512 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 7, 1907

Tuckerman v. Stephens, etc., Transp. Co., 32 N. J. Law, 320. … Co. v. Farr & Bailey Mfg. Co., a.nd The Alvena, supra.

In re Silvies River

199 F. 495 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 7, 1912

Weston v. City Council of Charleston, 2 Peters, 449 -464, 7 L. Ed. 481 ; Gaines v. Fuentes, 92 U. S. 10 , 23 L. Ed. 524 . … Fitzgerald v. Mo. Pac. Ry. (C. C.) 45 Fed. 812 ; Plant v. Harrison (C. C.) 101 Fed. 307 ; Wrightsville Hdw. Co. v. Colwell (C. C.) 180 Fed. 589 . Motion to remand is therefore allowed.

Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 5, 2026

A at 2- 3, 7; Decl. of Byron Brown Supp. Pl. Resp. (“Brown Decl.”), ECF 49-2, ¶¶ 2.2 Plaintiff makes a profit on the majority of the days he works. Wilson Decl. Ex. A at 9-10. … Lasley v. Combined Transp., Inc., 234 Or. App. 11, 16, 227 P.3d 1200 (2010) (citing Buchler v. Or. Corr.

United States National Bank of Portland v. United States

178 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 2, 1959

Mann Chemical Laboratories, Inc. v. United States, D.C.D. Mass.1958, 174 F.Supp. 563 . Cf. Lan-goma Lumber Corp. v. United States, D. … C.E.D.Pa.1955, 140 F.Supp. 460 , affirmed per curiam, 3 Cir., 1956, 232 F.2d 886 ; Wagner Whirler & Derrick Corp. v. United States, 1954, 121 F.Supp. 664 , 128 Ct.Cl. 382 .

Aasum v. Good Samaritan Hospital

395 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 15, 1975

In Jackson v. … Id. 376 F.Supp. at 799 ; Straube v. Larson, Civil No. 74-308 (D.Or.1974). . See also Scott v.

Ernst v. United States

293 F. Supp. 3d 1242 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2017

See Hart v. … When the potential lender asked about collateral, the defendant explained where Brown would get the money to repay the loan and also stated that Brown and the lender could go to San Francisco to get cocaine as a "further

Odoms v. Oregon State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 24, 2021

OREGON STATE BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. … See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

O'BRIEN v. United States

166 F. Supp. 231 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 30, 1958

In Brown v. Harrison, plaintiff was injured when traveling on the highway from Knowle to Warwick, England, when a chestnut tree in an obvious state of decay, 18 feet from the highway, broke. In Hay v. … Because of its reliance on actual notice, the Ohio court does not adhere to the rule laid down in either Brandywine Hundred Realty Co. v. Cotillo or Brown v.

United States v. Cuevas-Ceja

58 F. Supp. 2d 1175 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 14, 1999

United States v. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). The questioning of Cuevas took place shortly after the unlawful seizure on the bus and the discovery of drugs in her bag.

United States v. Bruinier

293 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 26, 1968

Venus v. United States, Graves v. United States, supra. Nor could the October, 1966, letter informing Bruinier of his outstanding induction order make him a delinquent. … In any event, Graves v.

The George W. Elder

159 F. 1009 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 21, 1908

The principle involved is supported by David v. … The Oregon Supreme Court seems to have settled the question otherwise (David v. Water Committee, supra; State v. George, 22 Or. 142 , 29 Pac. 356 , 16 L. R. A. 737, 29 Am. St. Rep. 586 ; Eddy v.

Dillon v. United States

230 F. Supp. 487 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 22, 1964

Martin v. United States, 10 Cir., 1960, 273 F.2d 775, 777-778 .” Cited in Brown v. United States, 186 F.Supp. 410 , 411 n. 2 (D.Cr.1960). … Ed. 366 (1866), approved in Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 ; see Konigsberg v.

Mendacino v. The Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 15, 2020

THE OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Defendant. … United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.

VanLeeuwen v. Farm Credit Administration

600 F. Supp. 1161 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 12, 1984

United States v. Sparks, 685 F.2d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.1982). … In Arco Corp. v.

Sorenson v. Daniels

364 F. Supp. 2d 1220 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 4, 2005

Sorenson appealed to the National Appeals Board, arguing the new sentence was too severe. The National Appeals Board affirmed the Parole Commission’s revocation decision, but reduced Mr. … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1990). This court need not delve into the issue of whether Mr. Sorenson exhausted his administrative remedies.

Roberts v. Legacy Meridian Park Hospital, Inc.

97 F. Supp. 3d 1245 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 10, 2015

The Hearn v. … See, e.g., Rubel v.

McLean v. Pine Eagle School District, No. 61

194 F. Supp. 3d 1102 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 1, 2016

Plaintiff argues that the Safety Committee’s decisions were not constrained by any school board policy or subject to review by the board. Plaintiff adds that this case is similar to the facts in Hyland v. … Pine Eagle’s other school board members also did not learn about the drill until after it happened. . In Flores v.

McCormick v. Claytor

441 F. Supp. 622 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 4, 1977

(Review Board). … I note also that in Rew v. Ward, 402 F.Supp. 331 at 341-344 (D.N.M.1975), a procedure very similar to that followed here was held to satisfy due process. See also, Ong v. Tovey, supra. The recent case of Mathews v.

Independent Living Resources v. Oregon Arena Corp.

982 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 12, 1997

Inc. v. … Craig, 429 U.S. at 193-94 , 97 S.Ct. at 454-455 ; Board of Natural Resources v. Brown, 992 F.2d 937, 945-46 (9th Cir.1993). The instant case would appear to be an appropriate candidate for jus tertii standing. 89 .

United States v. Lonseth

300 F. Supp. 857 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 11, 1969

Stain v. United States, 235 F.2d 339 (9th Cir. 1956). … This much-quoted language from Dickinson v.