Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
1.40s
Barker v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 28, 2020
See Thomas v. … .”); United States. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown910 F. Supp. 2d 1249 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 21, 2012
. *1256 HOLA vested the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (the “Board”), and,, after 1989, its successor agency, the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), with plenary authority to administer its provisions. 4 See de la Cuesta … Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 361 (5th Cir.1977))); see also Butner v. United States, 440 U.S. 48, 55 , 99 S.Ct. 914 , 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979) (“Property interests are created and defined by state law.”).
Cited 4 timesPublished812 F. Supp. 1089 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 8, 1991
of sentence; and that the recent case of United States v. … The Brown case has resolved that issue in Dougherty’s favor. United States v. Freeman does not require a different result.
Cited 6 timesPublishedStellar J Corp. v. Smith & Loveless, Inc.
749 F. Supp. 2d 1137 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 5, 2010
ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … See also United States v. Reynar-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc); United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBalfour v. Portland & Asiatic S. S. Co.
167 F. 1010 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 8, 1909
The case of Nobel’s Explosives Co. v. Jenkins, L. R. 1896, 2 Q. B. 326, cited by the Supreme Court, is also quite analogous. … But this argument is disposed of by the cases of (Geipel v. Smith. L. R. 7 Q. B. 404, and Rodoconachi v. Elliott, L. R. 9 C. P. 518.
Cited 8 timesPublished275 F. Supp. 700 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 6, 1967
McWilliams is now on parole subject to the control and custody of the respondent, the Director of the State Board of Parole and Probation. … McWilliams v. Gladden, 242 Or. 333 , 407 P.2d 833 (1965).
Cited 2 timesPublishedJenkins v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
District Court, D. Oregon · May 8, 2024
See Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7-11 (1979). … Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216, 220 (2011) (per curiam).
Cited 0 timesUnknown8 F. Cas. 1177 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 20, 1869
V. That the matter of fact stated in the affirmation of said Kohl, made before the said William S. … S., 5 Cranch, 305 ; Gelston v. Hoyt, 3 Wheat. 318 ; Adm. Rule 22.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBasquall v. The City of Carlisle
39 F. 807 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 20, 1889
Justice Brown says, (page 395:) “The only recognized qualification of the seaman’s right of recovery is where the injuries have arisen from his own gross and willful misconduct.” And in Olson v. Flavel, 34 Fed. … Insurance Co. v. Dunham, 11 Wall. 1 ; Ben. Adm. § 261.
Cited 17 timesPublishedStover v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 25, 2021
Hibbler v. Benedetti, 693 F.3d 1140, 1146 (9th Cir. 2012). … Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 340 (2003).
Cited 0 timesUnknownReudiger v. United States Forest Service
427 F. Supp. 2d 975 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 6, 2005
On February 13, 1998, FGS filed the Oregon Dutch Timber Harvest Plan (“THP”) with the State of California, in conformance with California’s Forest Practice Act and Board of Forestry regulations. AR 1371. … Deck of Brown, ¶ 9,10. II.
Cited 0 timesPublished345 F. Supp. 3d 1308 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 17, 2018
Judge Brown dismissed Plaintiff's claim for abuse of a vulnerable person without prejudice and bifurcated this case. Judge Brown first found that the other driver was liable as a matter of law. … Judge Brown next held an eight-day bench trial from January 25 to February 3, 2016.
Cited 5 timesPublishedGunter v. North Wasco County School District Board of Education
District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 22, 2021
with “Under governor Brown’s Executive Order 21-15 we are still under a state of emergency related to COVID-19. … Heller v. Doe by Doe, 509 U.S. 312, 319 (1993) (quoting FCC v. Beach Communs., Inc., 508 U.S. 307, 313 (1993)). Laws under review, including rules passed by a school board, are presumed valid. Harrah Indep. Sch.
Cited 0 timesUnknownActon v. Vernonia School District 47J
796 F. Supp. 1354 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 7, 1992
In State v. … State v. Brown, 301 Or. 268, 273 , 721 P.2d 1357 (1986).
Cited 11 timesPublishedZimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of Justice
983 F. Supp. 1327 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 31, 1997
Williams v. Board of Educ., 972 F.Supp. 248, 250 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (filing complaint with U.S. Dep’t of Education Office of Civil Rights not equivalent to filing with the EEOC or a state or local agency). … See Irwin v.
Cited 6 timesPublished364 F. Supp. 2d 1216 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 4, 2005
Sherman failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because he failed to appeal to the Parole Commission’s National Appeals Board. Mr. … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1990). This court need not delve into the issue of whether Mr. Sherman exhausted his administrative remedies.
Cited 2 timesPublishedColes Valley Church v. Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals
District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 27, 2020
See Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals’ Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 8 (“LUBA’s Mot. Dismiss”). … P. 12(h)(3); see also Pistor v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownColes Valley Church v. Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals
District Court, D. Oregon · May 14, 2021
P. 12(h)(3); see also Pistor v. … See also Wood v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBondick v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 2, 2019
The Amended Complaint reasserts plaintiffs claims against the Board of Governors and also names the Chair of the Board of Governors, the Chair of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Chair of the … Wilson v, Lynch, 835, 5.3d 1083, 1090 & n.2.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna